APPI
Japan's regulation protecting personal information handling
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
APPI mandates privacy protections for Japanese personal data across industries, enforced by PPC fines up to ¥100M. ISO 13485 provides voluntary QMS certification for medical devices, enabling regulatory compliance and market access through audits.
APPI
Act on the Protection of Personal Information
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope targets foreign businesses handling Japanese data
- Pseudonymously processed info enables consent-free purpose changes
- Explicit prior consent for sensitive data transfers
- PPC fines up to ¥100 million for violations
- Four security categories: systematic, human, physical, technical
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based controls for device lifecycle processes
- Design and development validation requirements
- Supplier evaluation and outsourcing oversight
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
- Traceability and medical device file maintenance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
APPI Details
What It Is
Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) is Japan's primary national regulation enacted in 2003, amended through 2022-2024. It governs collection, use, security, and transfer of personal data identifying individuals, balancing privacy with economic utility. Scope covers businesses handling Japanese residents' data, with extraterritorial reach. Employs risk-based, principle-driven approach emphasizing consent, purpose limitation, and safeguards.
Key Components
- Core principles: transparency, data minimization, accuracy, security, rights.
- Pseudonymously processed information for flexible analytics.
- Sensitive data protections, cross-border transfer consents.
- PPC enforcement with audits, ¥100M fines. No certification; compliance via self-assessments, guidelines.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for data handlers to avoid fines, reputational harm. Builds consumer trust (78% prefer compliant brands), enables cross-border flows via adequacy (EU). Reduces risks, boosts efficiency (15-25% cost savings), competitive edge in tech, e-commerce, finance.
Implementation Overview
**Phased 12-24 month frameworkgap analysis, policy design, technical controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries targeting Japan; SMEs lighter touch. Involves data mapping, DPO appointment, vendor DPAs, training. PPC audits drive continuous improvement.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It is a certifiable QMS framework for organizations in the medical device lifecycle, emphasizing risk-based controls, documented processes, traceability, validation, and post-market obligations to ensure devices meet customer and regulatory requirements.
Key Components
- Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation (4), management responsibility (5), resources (6), product realization (7), measurement/improvement (8).
- Covers design controls, supplier management, process validation, complaint handling, CAPA.
- Built on process approach, aligned with ISO 9001 but enhanced for regulatory needs like ISO 14971 risk management.
- Third-party certification via accredited bodies with stage audits and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026).
- Mitigates risks, reduces recalls, ensures compliance.
- Builds stakeholder trust, differentiates competitively, lowers cost of quality.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, documentation, validation, audits.
- Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, all sizes; global scope.
- Requires certification audits; 9–18 months typical.
Key Differences
| Aspect | APPI | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection and privacy | Medical device quality management systems |
| Industry | All sectors handling Japanese data | Medical devices and related services |
| Nature | Mandatory national privacy law | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | PPC audits and inspections | Certification body audits, internal audits |
| Penalties | ¥100M fines, imprisonment | Loss of certification, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about APPI and ISO 13485
APPI FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025
Unlock top 5 reasons TISAX tabletop exercises deliver 4:1 ROI preventing €10M+ supply chain breaches for ADAS Tier 1 suppliers. ENX case studies & VDA ISA contr

CMMC Level 2 Implementation Guide for Small DIB Contractors: First 5 Steps to C3PAO Certification with Infographic
Actionable CMMC Level 2 guide for small DIB contractors: 5-step roadmap to C3PAO certification with infographic on timelines, costs & POA&Ms. Achieve DoD compli

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 55001 vs EMAS
Compare ISO 55001 vs EMAS: Key differences in asset management & environmental standards. Boost compliance, efficiency & sustainability. Align for peak performance now.
NIS2 vs MAS TRM
Compare NIS2 vs MAS TRM: EU directive expands cyber rules for essential entities vs Singapore's finance TRM guidelines. Key scopes, reporting, fines & strategies revealed. Boost resilience now.
TOGAF vs SOX
Compare TOGAF vs SOX: Discover how TOGAF's ADM, governance, and ITGCs streamline SOX 404 compliance, ICFR testing, and enterprise risk management. Optimize now!