NIS2
EU directive for cybersecurity resilience across critical sectors
MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical sectors via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while MAS TRM provides supervisory guidelines for Singapore FIs emphasizing governance, cyber resilience, and proportional controls. Organizations adopt them for regulatory compliance and enhanced operational security.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Expands scope with size-cap rule for medium/large entities
- Mandates 24-hour early warning incident reporting
- Holds senior management directly accountable for compliance
- Imposes fines up to 2% global annual turnover
- Requires continuous risk management and supply chain security
MAS TRM
MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines
Key Features
- Board and senior management accountability
- Proportionality based on risk and criticality
- Third-party risk management requirements
- Defense-in-depth cyber resilience controls
- Annual penetration testing for internet systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive. It establishes a high common level of cybersecurity resilience for critical infrastructure and digital services across member states. Primary scope covers essential and important entities in sectors like energy, transport, health, and digital providers, using a risk-based approach with size-cap rules (e.g., 50+ employees or €10M turnover).
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, incident reporting, business continuity, corporate accountability.
- Strict timelines: 24-hour early warnings, 72-hour notifications, one-month final reports to CSIRTs.
- Built on standards like ISO 27001, NIST CSF; mandates supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
- Continuous assurance model with spot checks; no formal certification but national enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal compliance avoids fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M. Enhances resilience against threats, builds stakeholder trust, ensures operational continuity. Provides competitive edge through harmonized EU-wide security.
Implementation Overview
Assess applicability by size/sector, conduct risk assessments, implement measures, establish reporting. Tailor to national transpositions (by Oct 2024). Applies to medium/large EU entities in covered sectors; involves training, audits, governance changes. (178 words)
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions. They provide a principles-based framework for managing technology and cyber risks, emphasizing proportionality based on risk profile, complexity, and criticality to ensure CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, availability).
Key Components
- 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT operations, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber defense, testing, and audit.
- Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset inventory, third-party oversight, and defense-in-depth.
- No fixed controls; focuses on outcomes with independent assurance.
Why Organizations Use It
- **Regulatory supervisionMAS evaluates observance during inspections; non-compliance risks fines, enforcement.
- Enhances cyber resilience, reduces incidents, builds customer trust.
- Supports digital transformation with secure-by-design practices.
Implementation Overview
- **Risk-based rolloutInventory assets, assess risks, implement controls proportionally.
- Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; phased for size/complexity.
- No certification; demonstrated via audits, metrics, board reporting.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | MAS TRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk mgmt, incident reporting, governance for critical sectors | Technology risk governance, cyber resilience, IT operations for FIs |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors (energy, transport, digital) | Singapore financial institutions (banks, insurers, fintechs) |
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive, transposed nationally with fines | Supervisory guidelines, proportional implementation enforced via supervision |
| Testing | Risk assessments, supply chain security, business continuity plans | Annual PT for internet systems, VA, DR tests, red teaming |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover or €10M for essential entities | Supervisory actions, fines, license conditions, executive prohibitions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and MAS TRM
NIS2 FAQ
MAS TRM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring
Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PRINCE2 vs BRC
PRINCE2 vs BRC: Compare structured project governance (7 principles, processes) with food safety standards (HACCP, site controls). Boost compliance & success now!
UAE PDPL vs CMMI
Unlock UAE PDPL vs CMMI: Compare privacy law mandates with process maturity for compliance synergy. Boost efficiency, cut risks—align UAE ops now!
ISO 9001 vs AS9110C
Discover ISO 9001 vs AS9110C: Core QMS standard meets aerospace maintenance needs. Key diffs, benefits & implementation tips for compliance & efficiency. Compare now!