Standards Comparison

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace quality management system extending ISO 9001

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for financial information security

    Quick Verdict

    AS9100 ensures quality management for global aerospace firms via certification, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial entities with strict testing and reporting. Aerospace suppliers seek market access; banks avoid regulatory penalties.

    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100D:2016 Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, Defense

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Explicit configuration management for product integrity
    • Dedicated product safety lifecycle controls
    • Counterfeit parts prevention processes
    • Operational risk management in Clause 8
    • Enhanced supplier and sub-tier controls
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Systematic independent testing of controls
    • Third-party asset management obligations
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100D:2016 is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, focusing on safety-critical processes via a process-based, risk-oriented approach using Annex SL structure.

    Key Components

    • **Clause 8 additionsconfiguration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1).
    • Enhanced supplier controls, human factors, and traceability.
    • Built on PDCA cycle with leadership accountability (Clause 5) and performance evaluation (Clause 9).
    • Third-party certification via IAQG-accredited audits, OASIS database listing.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Market access: Required by OEMs for supply chain qualification.
    • Risk reduction: Prevents defects, ensures product integrity, lowers escapes.
    • Benefits: Improved delivery, cost savings, supplier performance.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through proven safety and compliance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification.
    • Applies to designers, manufacturers, MROs globally.
    • 6-18 months typical, with annual surveillance.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties.

    Key Components

    • Governance with Board ultimate accountability and defined roles.
    • Information asset classification by criticality and sensitivity.
    • Commensurate controls, systematic testing, and independent assurance.
    • Incident response plans with annual testing.
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents; 10 business days for unremediable weaknesses. No fixed control count; risk-based approach.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance to avoid enforcement, penalties, and scrutiny.
    • Enhances operational resilience, reduces incident impact.
    • Builds customer trust, enables better vendor terms.
    • Strategic differentiation in partnerships and market access.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset register, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; requires ongoing assurance, no formal certification but APRA audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    AS9100
    Quality management for aerospace products/services
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security for financial information assets

    Industry

    AS9100
    Aviation, space, defense globally
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services (banks, insurers)

    Nature

    AS9100
    Voluntary certification standard
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential regulation

    Testing

    AS9100
    Third-party certification audits, internal audits
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic control testing, internal audit assurance

    Penalties

    AS9100
    Loss of certification, market exclusion
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulatory sanctions, fines, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about AS9100 and APRA CPS 234

    AS9100 FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages