GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/AS9100 vs EN 1090
    Standards Comparison

    AS9100 vs EN 1090

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace quality management system standard extending ISO 9001

    VS

    EN 1090

    Mandatory
    2009

    EU standard for steel/aluminium structures execution and CE marking

    Quick Verdict

    AS9100 delivers aerospace-specific QMS certification for aviation/space/defense suppliers worldwide, emphasizing risk, safety, and supply chain controls. EN 1090 mandates CE marking for EU structural steel/aluminium via FPC, ensuring execution quality. Organizations adopt AS9100 for OEM access; EN 1090 for legal market entry.

    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100:2026 Aerospace Quality Management Systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Explicit product safety controls across lifecycle (8.1.3)
    • Configuration management for design integrity (8.1.2)
    • Counterfeit parts prevention in operations (8.1.4)
    • Operational risk management processes (8.1.1)
    • Enhanced supplier controls and traceability (8.4)
    Structural Metalwork

    EN 1090

    EN 1090: Execution of steel and aluminium structures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
    • Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
    • CE marking and Declaration of Performance
    • Welding management per ISO 3834
    • Material traceability and NDT inspections

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100:2026 is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2026 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a process-based, risk-oriented approach across 10 clauses.

    Key Components

    • Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1), human factors.
    • Built on Annex SL structure; certified via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access as OEM prerequisite.
    • Reduces defects, improves delivery, manages supply chain risks.
    • Enhances safety, traceability, counterfeit avoidance.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via OASIS visibility.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-18 months).
    • Applies to designers, manufacturers, suppliers; global scope.
    • Evidence-driven audits emphasize operational effectiveness.

    EN 1090 Details

    What It Is

    EN 1090 is the European harmonized standard family (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) governing execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components/kits for construction works. Under the CPR, it enables CE marking via a risk-based approach through Execution Classes (EXC1-4), scaling requirements for fabrication, welding, tolerances, and inspection.

    Key Components

    • EN 1090-1 FPC certification, AVCP, DoP issuance
    • EN 1090-2/-3 Technical rules for steel/aluminium execution
    • Core pillars Material traceability, welding (ISO 3834), NDT, tolerances
    • Notified body certification with ongoing surveillance

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for EU market access and CE marking
    • Mitigates liability, ensures safety via risk scaling
    • Builds trust, reduces rework, enables high-risk projects
    • Competitive edge in tenders, supply chains

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, FPC build, personnel quals, NB audit. Applies to fabricators globally targeting EU; 6-12 months typical, certified FPC essential. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    AspectAS9100EN 1090
    ScopeAerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controlsStructural steel/aluminium execution and conformity assessment
    IndustryAviation, space, defense globallyConstruction, steel/aluminium fabrication in EU/EEA
    NatureVoluntary certification standard (IAQG)Mandatory harmonized standard for CE marking (CPR)
    TestingThird-party audits, surveillance every yearFPC certification, initial inspection, continuous surveillance
    PenaltiesLoss of certification, market exclusionMarket withdrawal, fines, legal liability

    Scope

    AS9100
    Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls
    EN 1090
    Structural steel/aluminium execution and conformity assessment

    Industry

    AS9100
    Aviation, space, defense globally
    EN 1090
    Construction, steel/aluminium fabrication in EU/EEA

    Nature

    AS9100
    Voluntary certification standard (IAQG)
    EN 1090
    Mandatory harmonized standard for CE marking (CPR)

    Testing

    AS9100
    Third-party audits, surveillance every year
    EN 1090
    FPC certification, initial inspection, continuous surveillance

    Penalties

    AS9100
    Loss of certification, market exclusion
    EN 1090
    Market withdrawal, fines, legal liability

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about AS9100 and EN 1090

    AS9100 FAQ

    EN 1090 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic

    SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic

    First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over

    Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

    Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

    Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris

    Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

    Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

    Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how AS9100 and EN 1090 compare against other standards

    Other AS9100 Comparisons

    • EPA vs AS9100
    • SQF vs AS9100
    • WCAG vs AS9100
    • ISO 14001 vs AS9100
    • RoHS vs AS9100

    Other EN 1090 Comparisons

    • EN 1090 vs NERC CIP
    • EN 1090 vs GRI
    • EPA vs EN 1090
    • SQF vs EN 1090
    • ISO 14001 vs EN 1090
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved