Standards Comparison

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace quality management systems standard extending ISO 9001

    VS

    GRI

    Voluntary
    2021

    Global framework for sustainability impact reporting

    Quick Verdict

    AS9100 delivers rigorous QMS certification for aerospace safety and supply chains, while GRI enables impact-focused sustainability reporting for all sectors. Aerospace firms adopt AS9100 for OEM approval; others use GRI for stakeholder transparency and regulatory alignment.

    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100D:2016 Quality Management Systems Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Configuration management ensures product integrity lifecycle
    • Product safety planning and controls across lifecycle
    • Counterfeit parts prevention and detection processes
    • Operational risk management in product realization
    • Enhanced supplier controls and supply chain oversight
    Sustainability Reporting

    GRI

    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Impact-based materiality assessment process
    • Modular Universal, Sector, and Topic Standards
    • Mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability
    • Broad worker scope including contractors
    • Supply chain environmental and OHS disclosures

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100D:2016 is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements. Primary purpose: ensure product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability in high-risk sectors. Adopts a process-based, risk-thinking approach via 10-clause Annex SL structure.

    Key Components

    • Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1).
    • Core pillars: leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Built on ISO 9001 PDCA cycle with enhanced supplier controls and human factors.
    • Third-party certification via IAQG-accredited audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual mandates from OEMs for market access.
    • Reduces defects, improves delivery, cuts costs.
    • Manages safety risks, builds stakeholder trust.
    • Enhances competitiveness via OASIS visibility.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-18 months).
    • Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, MROs globally.
    • Requires Stage 1/2 certification, annual surveillance.

    GRI Details

    What It Is

    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards is a modular sustainability reporting framework. It provides a global common language for organizations to disclose significant economic, environmental, and social impacts. The primary purpose is impact-centric materiality, focusing on actual and potential effects on stakeholders rather than financial materiality alone. Key approach involves structured materiality assessments and standardized disclosures.

    Key Components

    • Universal Standards (GRI 1: Foundation, GRI 2: General Disclosures, GRI 3: Material Topics) as baseline.
    • Sector Standards for high-impact industries like oil & gas, mining.
    • Topic Standards (e.g., GRI 403 Occupational Health & Safety, GRI 308 Supplier Environmental Assessment) with specific metrics.
    • Built on principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability; requires GRI Content Index for traceability. Compliance via "in accordance" reporting, no formal certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives accountability, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU CSRD), and benchmarking. Enhances stakeholder trust, reduces risks in supply chains, supports investor demands via GRI-SASB interoperability. Builds decision-useful data for executives and broad audiences.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: materiality assessment, data systems, management approaches, content index. Applies to all sizes/sectors globally; involves governance oversight, stakeholder engagement. External assurance recommended, not required.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    AS9100
    Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls
    GRI
    Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people

    Industry

    AS9100
    Aviation, space, defense organizations globally
    GRI
    All industries and sectors worldwide

    Nature

    AS9100
    Voluntary certification standard
    GRI
    Voluntary sustainability reporting framework

    Testing

    AS9100
    Third-party audits, Stage 1/2, annual surveillance
    GRI
    Internal verification, optional external assurance

    Penalties

    AS9100
    Loss of certification, market exclusion
    GRI
    Reputational damage, no formal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about AS9100 and GRI

    AS9100 FAQ

    GRI FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages