What is the primary objective of **OSHA**?

**The primary objective of OSHA is to assure safe and healthful working conditions for every working man and woman in the nation.** Established under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Section 2), OSHA enforces standards in 29 CFR 1910 (general industry), reduces workplace hazards via the General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1)), and promotes prevention through research (NIOSH), training, and cooperative programs.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **OSHA**?

**All private sector employers engaged in businesses affecting interstate commerce must comply with OSHA.** Coverage under the OSH Act excludes self-employed individuals, immediate family farms, and workplaces under other federal statutes (e.g., mining); applies to employers with more than 10 employees for recordkeeping (29 CFR 1904); state plans in 22 states/territories must be at least as effective as federal standards.

Does **OSHA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**OSHA does not require external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is verified through OSHA inspections (Part 1903), prioritized by imminent dangers, severe injuries, complaints, and high-hazard targeting; employers self-certify OSHA 300A summaries annually; Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP) offer recognition but are voluntary.

How often should an assessment for **OSHA** be performed?

**OSHA requires periodic assessments via hazard identification, inspections, and program evaluations, with frequencies specified in standards.** Examples: annual LOTO inspections (1910.147), quarterly lead monitoring if above PEL (1910.1025), noise monitoring at 85 dBA action level (1910.95); OSHA recommends ongoing JHAs and continuous improvement in Injury and Illness Prevention Programs.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **OSHA**?

**Non-compliance with OSHA results in citations, civil penalties up to $165,514 per willful/repeated violation, and $16,550 per serious violation (as of January 15, 2025).** Failure-to-abate incurs $16,550 daily; inspections within six months (Part 1903); contests to OSHRC within 15 days; criminal penalties possible for willful violations causing death.

An **OSHA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**OSHA can be mapped to other international frameworks through shared principles like hazard controls and management systems.** Its hierarchy of controls and program elements (e.g., IIPP) align with voluntary guidelines such as ANSI/ASSP Z10 and global standards emphasizing prevention, though OSHA remains U.S.-specific with codified 29 CFR requirements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **OSHA**?

**The first step to implement OSHA is to develop management leadership and commitment via a written safety policy.** Per OSHA guidelines, secure executive endorsement, assign responsibilities, allocate resources, and conduct initial hazard identification (JHAs) to prioritize controls under the hierarchy: elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 31000**?

**The primary objective of ISO 31000 is to provide principles, a framework, and process for managing risk to create and protect value by systematically addressing the effect of uncertainty on objectives.** Clause 4 outlines eight principles (integrated, structured and comprehensive, customized, inclusive, dynamic, best available information, human and cultural factors, continual improvement). Clause 5 details the framework (leadership commitment, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement). Clause 6 specifies the iterative process (communication/consultation, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting), embedding risk management into governance and operations for better decisions.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 31000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 31000, as it provides voluntary guidelines rather than mandatory requirements.** It applies universally to any organization—public, private, large, small, any sector—for professional risk management. ISO states it is “not intended for certification purposes,” positioning it for boards, executives, and risk practitioners to demonstrate alignment through internal governance, not legal compulsion.

Does **ISO 31000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 31000 does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it offers guidelines, not auditable requirements.** ISO confirms it is “not intended for certification purposes.” Assurance derives from internal mechanisms like leadership oversight, evaluation (Clause 5), monitoring/review (Clause 6), and internal audits verifying framework and process effectiveness.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 31000** be performed?

**ISO 31000 requires continual, iterative risk assessments through dynamic monitoring and review, not fixed intervals.** Clause 6.5 mandates ongoing monitoring of performance and periodic/ad hoc reviews for context changes, control effectiveness, or new information. Frequency aligns with organizational context: regular cadences (e.g., quarterly enterprise reviews), event-driven triggers (incidents, strategy shifts), and continual improvement cycles.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 31000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 31000 carries no direct penalties, as it is a voluntary guideline without enforceable requirements.** Indirect consequences include regulatory scrutiny in sectors expecting systematic risk management, operational losses from unmanaged uncertainty, reputational damage, and suboptimal decisions. Effective alignment enhances resilience; misalignment risks incidents, poor resource allocation, and stakeholder distrust.

An **ISO 31000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 31000 can be mapped to other international frameworks as its foundational principles, framework, and process support integration.** It aligns with management systems via PDCA cycles and provides a base for domain-specific applications, enabling consistent risk language across governance structures without prescribing tools.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 31000**?

**The first step to implement ISO 31000 is securing leadership commitment through a risk management policy and governance design (Clause 5.1).** Top management must demonstrate accountability by issuing policy, allocating resources, assigning roles, and integrating risk into organizational activities, establishing the framework before scaling the process.

OSHA vs ISO 31000

Standards Comparison

OSHA

Mandatory

1970

Federal regulation for U.S. workplace safety standards

ISO 31000

Voluntary

2018

International guidelines for enterprise risk management

Quick Verdict

OSHA mandates US workplace safety standards with inspections and fines, while ISO 31000 offers voluntary global risk management guidelines. Companies adopt OSHA for legal compliance; ISO 31000 for strategic resilience and decision-making.

Occupational Safety

OSHA

Occupational Safety and Health Standards (29 CFR 1910)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

General Duty Clause addresses recognized serious hazards
Hierarchy of controls prioritizes engineering over PPE
29 CFR 1910 standards cover industry-wide hazards
Mandatory OSHA 300 logs and e-reporting
Risk-prioritized inspections with willful penalties

Risk Management

ISO 31000

ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Eight principles guiding effective risk management
Framework emphasizing leadership and integration
Iterative process for risk assessment and treatment
Non-certifiable guidelines for any organization
Focus on human, cultural factors and improvement

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

OSHA Details

What It Is

OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) enforces the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, a federal regulatory framework. Codified in 29 CFR 1910 for general industry, it assures safe working conditions by setting enforceable standards, inspections, and the General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1)). It uses a performance-based approach with risk prioritization and hierarchy of controls.

Key Components

**Subparts A-ZWalking surfaces, PPE, HazCom, toxic substances (Subpart Z)
**Hierarchy of controlsElimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE
**RecordkeepingOSHA 300/300A/301 forms, electronic ITA submissions
**EnforcementInspections, citations, penalties up to $165,514 willful No formal certification; compliance self-managed.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal requirement for U.S. private employers
Avoids penalties, reduces injuries/illnesses, lowers insurance costs
Improves productivity, worker retention, ESG reputation
Enables state plan alignment, VPP recognition

Implementation Overview

**PhasedGap analysis, written programs (HazCom, LOTO, IIPP), training, audits
Applies broadly to private sector; varies by state plans
Ongoing maintenance; inspections verify compliance

ISO 31000 Details

What It Is

ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for systematic risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations of any size or sector manage uncertainty affecting objectives, using a principles-based, iterative approach focused on creating and protecting value.

Key Components

**Eight principlesIntegrated, structured, customized, inclusive, dynamic, best available information, human/cultural factors, continual improvement.
Framework (Clause 5): Leadership commitment, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement.
Process (Clause 6): Communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment (identify/analyze/evaluate), treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting.
No fixed controls; guidelines only, no certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Enhances decision-making, resilience, and value creation.
Aligns with governance, strategy; builds stakeholder trust.
Supports compliance in regulated sectors without mandates.
Provides competitive edge via risk-informed strategies.

Implementation Overview

Phased: leadership alignment, gap analysis, pilot, rollout, monitoring.
Tailored to context; involves policy, training, tools like GRC platforms.
Applies universally; no certification, internal assurance via audits.

Key Differences

Aspect	OSHA	ISO 31000
Scope	Workplace safety/health standards, enforcement	Enterprise risk management guidelines, all risks
Industry	US general industry, construction, agriculture	All industries worldwide, any organization
Nature	Mandatory US federal regulations, enforceable	Voluntary non-certifiable guidelines
Testing	OSHA inspections, compliance audits	Internal monitoring, reviews, no formal audits
Penalties	Civil fines up to $165k, criminal for willful	No penalties, internal governance only

Scope

OSHA

Workplace safety/health standards, enforcement

ISO 31000

Enterprise risk management guidelines, all risks

Industry

OSHA

US general industry, construction, agriculture

ISO 31000

All industries worldwide, any organization

Nature

OSHA

Mandatory US federal regulations, enforceable

ISO 31000

Voluntary non-certifiable guidelines

Testing

OSHA

OSHA inspections, compliance audits

ISO 31000

Internal monitoring, reviews, no formal audits

Penalties

OSHA

Civil fines up to $165k, criminal for willful

ISO 31000

No penalties, internal governance only

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about OSHA and ISO 31000

OSHA FAQ

ISO 31000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

Six Sigma vs RoHS

Discover Six Sigma vs RoHS: Compare data-driven process excellence methodology with EU hazardous substance rules for EEE. Boost compliance, quality & sustainability now!

Six Sigma vs APRA CPS 234

Explore Six Sigma vs APRA CPS 234: data-driven quality vs cyber resilience regs. Compare DMAIC, belts & controls for compliance, risk mgmt & ops excellence. Boost performance now!

IEC 62443 vs J-SOX

Compare IEC 62443 vs J-SOX: OT cybersecurity meets financial controls. Unlock compliance strategies, risk insights, and implementation roadmaps for resilient operations. Discover now!

OSHA

ISO 31000

Quick Verdict

OSHA

Key Features

ISO 31000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

OSHA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 31000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

OSHA FAQ

What is the primary objective of OSHA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with OSHA?

Does OSHA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for OSHA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with OSHA?

An OSHA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing OSHA?

ISO 31000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 31000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 31000?

Does ISO 31000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 31000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 31000?

An ISO 31000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 31000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

Six Sigma vs RoHS

Six Sigma vs APRA CPS 234

IEC 62443 vs J-SOX