What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100's primary objective is to establish a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations that ensures product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, including Clause 8.1.2 configuration management, 8.1.3 product safety, and 8.1.4 counterfeit parts prevention, to mitigate risks in high-consequence environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies professionally to organizations that design, develop, manufacture, or service aviation, space, and defense products.** Major OEMs and primes require certification as a supplier condition; it covers manufacturers, material suppliers, design centers, and quality organizations, with AS9100 for general use, AS9110 for MRO, and AS9120 for distributors.

Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 requires third-party certification through accredited bodies via a two-stage audit process.** Stage 1 assesses documentation readiness; Stage 2 verifies implementation effectiveness, followed by annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years, with visibility in the IAQG OASIS database.

How often should an assessment for **AS9100** be performed?

**AS9100 requires internal audits at planned intervals per Clause 9.2, annual surveillance audits post-certification, and full recertification every three years.** Risk-based internal audits focus on high-risk processes like operations (Clause 8), with management reviews ensuring ongoing performance evaluation.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9100**?

**Non-compliance with AS9100 risks certification suspension, loss of supplier approval, and exclusion from OEM contracts.** Audits identify nonconformities requiring corrective action within 60–90 days; persistent issues lead to major findings, market access denial via OASIS, and potential safety incidents or recalls.

Can **AS9100** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9100D aligns with ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL 10-clause structure (Clauses 4–10), enabling integrated management systems.** It supports mapping to standards sharing this framework, leveraging common elements like risk-based thinking (Clause 6.1), operational controls (Clause 8), and performance evaluation (Clause 9).

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9100**?

**The first step is conducting a gap analysis against AS9100D requirements to identify compliance gaps and define QMS scope per Clause 4.3.** Review current processes against Clauses 4–10, prioritize aerospace additions like product safety and configuration management, and develop an implementation plan with leadership commitment (Clause 5).

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 provides a code of practice for protecting **Personally Identifiable Information (PII)** in public clouds acting as PII processors.** It extends **ISO 27001** and **ISO 27002** with ~25–30 privacy-specific controls addressing cloud risks like multi-tenancy, subprocessors, consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, breach notification, and restrictions on secondary PII use (e.g., no marketing without consent). The 2025 edition aligns with **ISO 27002:2022**, enabling CSPs to demonstrate auditable processor obligations.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 targets public cloud service providers (CSPs) acting as PII processors, not controllers.** Applicable to hyperscalers, regional platforms, and sector-specific clouds (e.g., health, finance) processing customer PII. Controllers use it for vendor due diligence, but no universal legal mandate exists; adoption is driven by procurement, regulatory alignment (e.g., GDPR Article 28), and market demands from enterprises and insurers.

Does **ISO 27018** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27018 does not offer standalone certification; it is assessed via external audits within an **ISO 27001** ISMS by accredited bodies under **ISO/IEC 17021** and **ISO/IEC 27006**.** Auditors review ~25–30 added controls in the **Statement of Applicability (SoA)** during Stage 1 (documents) and Stage 2 (effectiveness) audits, with certificates valid 3 years supported by annual surveillance.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27018** be performed?

**ISO 27018 assessments occur annually via surveillance audits and every 3 years via full recertification within the **ISO 27001** cycle.** Internal risk assessments and gap analyses should be continual, with reviews triggered by changes in cloud services, subprocessors, or regulations to maintain **ISMS** effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27018**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27018 risks loss of market trust, procurement delays, cyber insurance issues, and failure to meet processor obligations under laws like GDPR.** No direct fines from the standard, but misalignment exposes CSPs to customer contract breaches, regulatory scrutiny, and competitive disadvantage without audited PII controls.

An **ISO 27018** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27018 maps directly to frameworks like **ISO 27001 Annex A** (93 controls), **ISO 27017** (cloud security), and **ISO 27701** (PIMS for controllers/processors).** Controls align with GDPR Article 28 processor duties, OECD privacy guidelines, and **ISO/IEC 29100** principles, enabling unified **SoA** documentation.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27018**?

**Conduct a gap analysis against current **ISMS**, **ISO 27001/27002** controls, and ISO 27018's ~25–30 PII-specific additions.** Engage stakeholders for risk assessment, scope PII cloud services, and produce a prioritized roadmap for remediation, ensuring **ISO 27001** prerequisite.

AS9100 vs ISO 27018

Standards Comparison

AS9100

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace quality management standard extending ISO 9001 requirements

ISO 27018

Voluntary

2019

International code of practice for PII protection in public clouds.

Quick Verdict

AS9100 ensures aerospace quality, safety, and supply chain integrity for aviation firms, while ISO 27018 protects PII in public clouds for service providers. Aerospace suppliers adopt AS9100 for OEM contracts; cloud operators pursue ISO 27018 to build customer trust and meet privacy regulations.

Quality Management

AS9100

AS9100D Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, Defense

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Explicit product safety controls across lifecycle (8.1.3)
Counterfeit parts prevention processes (8.1.4)
Configuration management for design integrity (8.1.2)
Operational risk management in processes (8.1.1)
Enhanced supplier controls and traceability (8.4)

Cloud Privacy

ISO 27018

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 PII protection in public clouds

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Privacy controls extension for public cloud PII processors
Subprocessor transparency and location disclosure requirements
Prohibits PII use for marketing without consent
Breach notification and incident management obligations
Supports data subject rights and secure deletion

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

AS9100 Details

What It Is

AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, focusing on safety-critical integrity via a process-based, risk-oriented approach using Annex SL structure.

Key Components

Core clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1), enhanced supplier controls.
Built on PDCA cycle; requires third-party certification via Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets OEM contractual mandates for market access.
Reduces defects, escapes, costs; improves delivery, supplier performance.
Manages high-consequence risks like safety events, counterfeits.
Builds trust via IAQG OASIS visibility, enhances competitiveness.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-18 months).
Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally; complex for SMEs due to supply chain scope.
Involves documented processes, risk registers, competence programs.

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is an international code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border flows, using a risk-based approach within an Information Security Management System (ISMS).

Key Components

Adds ~25–30 privacy-specific controls across organizational, people, physical, and technological domains.
Core principles: consent/choice, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, retention/disclosure limits, security safeguards, transparency, accountability.
Maps to ISO 27001 Annex A; assessed via Statement of Applicability during certification audits—no standalone certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives customer trust, procurement acceleration, regulatory alignment (GDPR, HIPAA).
Mitigates PII risks, enables subprocessor transparency, supports cyber insurance.
Provides market differentiation for cloud service providers (CSPs).

Implementation Overview

Conduct gap analysis, integrate controls into ISMS, update contracts/policies.
Involves training, technical measures (encryption, logging), annual audits.
Suits CSPs globally; requires ISO 27001 base, accredited third-party validation.

Key Differences

Aspect	AS9100	ISO 27018
Scope	Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls	PII protection in public cloud services for processors
Industry	Aviation, space, defense organizations globally	Cloud service providers handling personal data
Nature	Voluntary certifiable QMS standard	Code of practice extending ISO 27001
Testing	Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, 3-year recert	Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, annual surveillance
Penalties	Loss of certification, market access denial	No direct penalties, impacts ISO 27001 certification

Scope

AS9100

Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls

ISO 27018

PII protection in public cloud services for processors

Industry

AS9100

Aviation, space, defense organizations globally

ISO 27018

Cloud service providers handling personal data

Nature

AS9100

Voluntary certifiable QMS standard

ISO 27018

Code of practice extending ISO 27001

Testing

AS9100

Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, 3-year recert

ISO 27018

Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, annual surveillance

Penalties

AS9100

Loss of certification, market access denial

ISO 27018

No direct penalties, impacts ISO 27001 certification

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AS9100 and ISO 27018

AS9100 FAQ

ISO 27018 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 20000 vs AS9120B

Compare ISO 20000 vs AS9120B: ITSM governance meets aerospace distributor quality. Uncover key differences, risks, integration benefits & certification paths for compliance success. Dive in now!

TISAX vs NERC CIP

Compare TISAX vs NERC CIP: Automotive infosec meets grid reliability standards. Key differences, strategies & implementation for supply chain & BES compliance. Choose wisely—read now!

ISO 27018 vs ISO 27017

ISO 27018 vs ISO 27017: Compare PII privacy controls (27018) & cloud security extensions (27017). Key diffs, benefits for CSPs. Boost compliance—discover now!

AS9100

ISO 27018

Quick Verdict

AS9100

Key Features

ISO 27018

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

AS9100 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

AS9100 FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9100?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9100?

Does AS9100 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9100 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9100?

Can AS9100 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9100?

ISO 27018 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

An ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 20000 vs AS9120B

TISAX vs NERC CIP

ISO 27018 vs ISO 27017