What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100's primary objective is to establish a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations that ensures product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** Developed by the IAQG, AS9100D (2016) builds on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure with over 100 aerospace additions, including Clause 8.1 controls for operational risk (8.1.1), configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), and counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4). It mandates process-based QMS with risk-based thinking across enterprise (Clause 6.1) and operational levels, emphasizing lifecycle assurance, traceability, and human factors to prevent catastrophic failures.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies to organizations designing, developing, manufacturing, or servicing aviation, space, and defense products and services.** It targets manufacturers of parts, materials suppliers, design centers, and quality support organizations in ASD supply chains; AS9110 covers MRO, AS9120 distributors. While voluntary, certification is contractually required by OEMs/primes for supplier qualification and OASIS database visibility. Scope (Clause 4.3) must justify non-applicabilities without compromising conformity, with rigorous supplier flow-down (Clause 8.4).

Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 requires accredited third-party certification via Stage 1 (readiness/documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation/effectiveness) audits.** Performed by IAQG-recognized bodies using AS9101 guidance, certification lists organizations in OASIS. Maintenance involves annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years, verifying process effectiveness through evidence, nonconformity correction (typically 60-90 days), and continual improvement.

How often should an assessment for **AS9100** be performed?

**AS9100 requires internal audits at planned intervals per Clause 9.2, plus annual third-party surveillance audits and recertification every three years.** Internal audits must be risk-based, covering all processes with competent auditors; management reviews (Clause 9.3) evaluate performance quarterly or as needed. Surveillance focuses on high-risk areas like Clause 8 operations.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9100**?

**Non-compliance with AS9100 risks certification suspension/revocation, loss of OEM contracts, and supply chain exclusion via OASIS.** Major nonconformities in audits demand root-cause analysis (including human factors), corrective actions, and effectiveness verification; repeated failures lead to market disqualification. Operationally, gaps in product safety or configuration expose organizations to safety incidents, recalls, and liability.

An **AS9100** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9100D aligns with ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure, enabling mapping and integration with compatible management systems.** Its 10-clause PDCA framework (Clauses 4-10) supports unified risk planning, audits, and reviews; aerospace additions like Clause 8 controls enhance but do not conflict with shared elements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9100**?

**The first step is conducting a gap analysis against AS9100D requirements to identify compliance gaps and prioritize remediation.** Assemble a cross-functional team to map processes to Clauses 4-10, assess scope (4.3), risks (6.1), and aerospace additions (e.g., 8.1), producing a roadmap with timelines and resources.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 56002**?

**ISO 56002 provides guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an Innovation Management System (IMS).** The standard structures the IMS around the PDCA cycle and Clauses 4–10, covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement. It emphasizes value realization through future-focused leadership, strategic alignment, risk management, and continual learning, applicable to organizations of all sizes and sectors without prescribing specific tools or methods.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 56002**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 56002, as it is a voluntary guidance standard.** It is professionally relevant for established organizations of any size, sector, or innovation type (e.g., product, service, process) seeking to systematize innovation. Executives, R&D leaders, and compliance professionals adopt it to align innovation with strategy, manage portfolios, and demonstrate capability to stakeholders like investors and partners.

Oes **ISO 56002** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 56002 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a non-certifiable guidance standard.** Organizations may conduct internal audits (Clause 9.2) and management reviews (Clause 9.3) for self-assessment. Optional conformity assessments or preparation for ISO 56001 certification can provide external validation using tools like ISO 56004.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 56002** be performed?

**ISO 56002 assessments should be performed periodically through internal audits and management reviews, typically annually or as defined by organizational context.** Clause 9 mandates monitoring, measurement, and evaluation to support Clause 10 continual improvement, with frequency tailored to IMS scope, risks, and performance data via PDCA cycles.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 56002**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 56002 carries no legal penalties, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** Potential business consequences include resource waste on unmanaged portfolios, stalled "zombie projects," strategic obsolescence, IP risks, and lost competitive advantage from ad-hoc innovation lacking governance and measurable outcomes.

An **ISO 56002** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 56002 maps seamlessly to other international frameworks sharing the High-Level Structure (HLS), such as ISO 9001 and ISO 27001.** Its PDCA-aligned Clauses 4–10 enable integration of IMS elements like leadership reviews, audits, and documented information, reducing duplication while tailoring innovation governance to existing management systems.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 56002**?

**The first step to implement ISO 56002 is conducting a readiness diagnostic or gap analysis against Clauses 4–10.** This involves assessing current maturity (e.g., using Potential Innovation Index or ISO 56004), defining IMS scope (Clause 4), and securing leadership commitment (Clause 5) to prioritize interventions in a phased PDCA roadmap.

AS9100 vs ISO 56002

Standards Comparison

AS9100

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace quality management extending ISO 9001 requirements

ISO 56002

Voluntary

2019

International guidance for innovation management systems

Quick Verdict

AS9100 ensures aerospace quality and safety via certified QMS, while ISO 56002 guides innovation systems for value creation across sectors. Aerospace firms adopt AS9100 for supplier approval; others use ISO 56002 to systematize innovation for competitive edge.

Quality Management

AS9100

AS9100D Quality Management Systems for Aerospace

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Explicit product safety requirements across lifecycle
Counterfeit parts prevention and detection processes
Configuration management for product integrity
Operational risk management in Clause 8.1.1
Enhanced supplier controls and evaluation

Innovation Management

ISO 56002

ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system guidance

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

PDCA cycle structure across Clauses 4-10
Future-focused leadership and commitment requirements
Portfolio governance balancing risks and horizons
Balanced KPIs for inputs, throughput, outcomes
Continual improvement via audits and reviews

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

AS9100 Details

What It Is

AS9100D (2016) is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements. Primary purpose: ensure product safety, traceability, and supply chain integrity in high-risk sectors. Adopts a risk-based, process-oriented approach via 10-clause Annex SL structure.

Key Components

Aerospace additions: product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), configuration management (8.1.2), operational risks (8.1.1).
Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Built on ISO 9001 PDCA cycle with enhanced supplier controls and human factors.
Third-party certification via Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance.

Why Organizations Use It

Contractual mandates from OEMs for market access.
Reduces defects, rework, delivery delays; improves ROI.
Manages safety risks, counterfeit threats.
Builds stakeholder trust via OASIS database visibility.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification.
6-18 months typical; suits all sizes in ASD sectors globally.
Requires documented processes, KPIs, continual improvement.

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

ISO 56002:2019 is the international guidance standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). It offers a generic, principle-led framework applicable to all organizations, structured around the PDCA cycle and seven clauses focused on transforming innovation into strategic value realization.

Key Components

Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement
Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leaders, strategic direction, culture, insights, uncertainty management, adaptability, systems thinking
Non-prescriptive; tailorable; aligns with ISO Annex SL for integration
Guidance only; pairs with certifiable ISO 56001

Why Organizations Use It

Builds repeatable innovation capability and ROI
Reduces risks like zombie projects and waste
Enhances competitiveness, stakeholder trust
Fosters leadership-driven culture shift
Voluntary for best practices, no legal mandate

Implementation Overview

Phased: diagnose readiness, design governance, pilot portfolio, scale processes, sustain via audits (12-18 months typical). Universal applicability; SMEs use staged/lightweight approach. Optional conformity assessments.

Key Differences

Aspect	AS9100	ISO 56002
Scope	Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls	Innovation management system for value creation processes
Industry	Aviation, space, defense organizations globally	All sectors, sizes, innovation types worldwide
Nature	Certifiable QMS standard building on ISO 9001	Guidance for IMS, non-certifiable framework
Testing	Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recertification	Internal audits, management reviews, self-assessment
Penalties	Loss of certification, market access denial	No formal penalties, internal performance impacts

Scope

AS9100

Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls

ISO 56002

Innovation management system for value creation processes

Industry

AS9100

Aviation, space, defense organizations globally

ISO 56002

All sectors, sizes, innovation types worldwide

Nature

AS9100

Certifiable QMS standard building on ISO 9001

ISO 56002

Guidance for IMS, non-certifiable framework

Testing

AS9100

Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recertification

ISO 56002

Internal audits, management reviews, self-assessment

Penalties

AS9100

Loss of certification, market access denial

ISO 56002

No formal penalties, internal performance impacts

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AS9100 and ISO 56002

AS9100 FAQ

ISO 56002 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GDPR vs NERC CIP

Uncover GDPR vs NERC CIP: EU privacy law meets US grid cyber standards. Compare scopes, compliance demands, fines & strategies for energy firms. Master dual regs now!

ISO 14001 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Unlock ISO 14001 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules differences: EMS governance meets cyber disclosure mandates. Master integrated compliance, risk strategy & board oversight for resilient ops. Compare now!

LGPD vs CAA

Discover LGPD vs CAA: Brazil's GDPR-like data law meets U.S. Clean Air Act. Key diffs, compliance strategies & global tips for multinationals. Compare now!

AS9100

ISO 56002

Quick Verdict

AS9100

Key Features

ISO 56002

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

AS9100 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

AS9100 FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9100?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9100?

Does AS9100 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9100 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9100?

An AS9100 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9100?

ISO 56002 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 56002?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 56002?

Oes ISO 56002 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 56002 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 56002?

An ISO 56002 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 56002?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GDPR vs NERC CIP

ISO 14001 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

LGPD vs CAA