LGPD
Brazil's comprehensive personal data protection regulation
CAA
U.S. federal statute for air quality standards and emissions control
Quick Verdict
LGPD governs personal data protection for Brazilian residents with strict rights and fines, while CAA regulates U.S. air emissions via standards and permits. Companies adopt LGPD for Brazil compliance and market access; CAA to meet environmental mandates and avoid sanctions.
LGPD
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law 13.709/2018)
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope targeting Brazilian residents' data
- 10 core principles including prevention and non-discrimination
- Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue per infraction
- Mandatory DPO appointment for controllers
- 3-business-day breach notifications to ANPD
CAA
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.)
Key Features
- National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
- State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for attainment
- Title V operating permits consolidating requirements
- New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)
- MACT standards for hazardous air pollutants
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
LGPD Details
What It Is
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD), Law No. 13.709/2018, is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation. Enacted in 2018 and enforced since 2021, it safeguards personal data of Brazilian residents via extraterritorial scope and risk-based approach, mirroring GDPR but with local adaptations like 10 principles.
Key Components
- **10 core principlespurpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, accountability.
- Data subject rights: access, correction, deletion, portability, objection to automated decisions.
- 10 legal bases for processing, heightened rules for sensitive data.
- ANPD enforcement with graduated sanctions up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for compliance, avoiding multimillion fines and operational halts.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access in Brazil's digital economy.
- Risk management via DPIAs, breach notifications; competitive edge through privacy-by-design.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance/DPO appointment, data mapping/RoPA, policies/controls, training, audits. Applies universally to controllers/processors handling Brazilian data; ANPD oversees without certification but requires records/DPIAs.
CAA Details
What It Is
The Clean Air Act (CAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq., is a U.S. federal statute governing air pollution control. Its primary purpose is protecting public health and welfare from stationary and mobile source emissions via ambient standards, technology-based limits, and enforcement. It uses **cooperative federalismEPA sets national floors; states implement through SIPs and permits.
Key Components
- NAAQS for six criteria pollutants (primary/secondary standards).
- Source standards: NSPS, NESHAPs/MACT for HAPs, mobile rules.
- Title V permits, NSR/PSD, acid rain trading (Title IV), ozone protection (Title VI).
- Interlocking: ~100 NSPS subparts, 187 HAPs; compliance via permits/audits, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for major sources to avoid penalties, shutdowns.
- Manages enforcement risks, ensures permitting agility.
- Drives efficiency, ESG benefits, stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis (0-6 mo), permitting/design (6-18 mo), controls/monitoring (12-24 mo). Applies to emitters nationwide; ongoing via SIPs/Title V renewals, EPA/state audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | LGPD | CAA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data processing and privacy rights | Air emissions control and ambient quality standards |
| Industry | All sectors processing Brazilian data | Manufacturing, energy, all emission sources |
| Nature | Mandatory data protection law, ANPD enforcement | Mandatory environmental statute, EPA oversight |
| Testing | DPIAs for high-risk processing, audits | CEMS/stack testing, continuous monitoring |
| Penalties | 2% Brazilian revenue, up to R$50M fines | Civil penalties, injunctions, operational sanctions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about LGPD and CAA
LGPD FAQ
CAA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp
Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers
Slash CMMC costs 30-50% with top 10 hacks for small DIB suppliers. Enclave scoping, FedRAMP clouds, automation, POA&M tips & budgeting blueprints for Level 2 co
The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)
Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
COBIT vs ISO 27701
COBIT vs ISO 27701: IT governance powerhouse meets privacy PIMS standard. Compare domains, design factors & controls for compliance, risk. Choose your fit now!
PCI DSS vs ISO 27017
PCI DSS vs ISO 27017: Compare payment card security (12 reqs) with cloud controls (7 CLD). Key diffs in scope, shared resp, compliance. Choose right framework now!
FERPA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11
Compare FERPA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Decode student privacy rules and electronic records compliance. Master key differences, strategies, and pitfalls for seamless audits. Dive in now!