What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100's primary objective is to establish a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations that ensures product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** Developed by the IAQG, AS9100D (2016) builds on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure, adding over 100 aerospace-specific requirements in Clause 8, including operational risk management (8.1.1), configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), and counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4). It mandates process-based controls, risk-based thinking across enterprise (Clause 6.1) and operational levels, and lifecycle assurance to prevent catastrophic failures.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies professionally to organizations designing, developing, manufacturing, or servicing aviation, space, and defense products and services.** Major OEMs and primes require certification as a supplier qualification condition, with visibility via IAQG's OASIS database. It covers manufacturers, material suppliers, design centers, and quality organizations; AS9110 targets MRO, AS9120 distributors. Scope (Clause 4.3) must justify non-applicabilities without compromising conformity, extending controls to suppliers via rigorous approval and flow-down (Clause 8.4).

Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 requires third-party certification through accredited bodies via a two-stage audit process.** Stage 1 assesses documentation and readiness; Stage 2 verifies implementation and effectiveness using AS9101 guidance. Certification is maintained with annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years. Nonconformities demand corrective actions within 60-90 days, with evidence of process effectiveness via interviews, observations, and records.

How often should an assessment for **AS9100** be performed?

**AS9100 requires internal audits at planned intervals per Clause 9.2, plus annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years post-certification.** Internal audits must be risk-based, covering all processes with competent auditors. Management reviews (Clause 9.3) occur periodically, evaluating KPIs, audits, and improvements. Gap assessments precede implementation (6-18 months typical).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9100**?

**Non-compliance with AS9100 risks certification suspension, loss of OASIS visibility, and exclusion from OEM supplier lists.** Audits identify nonconformities requiring root-cause analysis (considering human factors, Clause 10); unresolved majors prevent certification. Operationally, it leads to quality escapes, product safety events, supply chain disruptions, and contractual penalties from primes enforcing certification.

Can **AS9100** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9100D aligns structurally with Annex SL frameworks via its ISO 9001:2015 10-clause format, enabling integrated management systems.** Clause structure (4-10) supports mapping to HSE standards through shared risk-based thinking (Clause 6.1), product safety (8.1.3), and human factors. It facilitates combined audits, with aerospace additions like configuration management complementing broader systems without clause conflicts.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9100**?

**The first step to implement AS9100 is performing a gap analysis against AS9100D clauses and current processes.** Define QMS scope (Clause 4.3), identify internal/external issues and interested parties (4.1-4.2), and prioritize aerospace gaps like Clause 8 controls. Form a cross-functional team, document findings, and create a risk-based implementation plan (6-18 months typical), securing leadership commitment (Clause 5).

What is the primary objective of **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM's primary objective is to establish sound technology risk governance and cyber resilience through defence-in-depth controls preserving confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of data and systems.** Issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in January 2021, the Guidelines promote proportional practices across financial institutions (FIs) for risk identification, assessment, treatment, monitoring, and reporting (Section 4), covering governance (Section 3), secure development (Sections 5-6), operations (Section 7), resilience (Section 8), and assessments (Section 13).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM applies to all financial institutions (FIs) supervised by MAS, including banks, insurers, capital market intermediaries, payment service providers, and fintech sandbox participants.** While non-prescriptive (Section 2.2), MAS evaluates observance of its spirit during supervision; boards and senior management bear ultimate accountability (Section 3.1), with proportionality based on FI size, service complexity, and risk exposure.

Does **MAS TRM** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**MAS TRM mandates an independent internal audit function to assess TRM control effectiveness, governance, and risk management (Sections 3.1.7, 15), but does not require external audits or third-party certification.** FIs may leverage external penetration testing (Section 13.2) or assurance for high-risk areas, with internal audit verifying overall compliance and ERM integration.

How often should an assessment for **MAS TRM** be performed?

**TRM assessments must occur regularly, with vulnerability assessments commensurate to system criticality (Section 13.1.1) and penetration testing at least annually for internet-exposed systems or after major changes (Section 13.2.4).** DR plans require annual reviews (Section 8.2.2), policies periodic updates (Section 3.2.1), and risk frameworks ongoing monitoring via registers (Section 4.5).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MAS TRM**?

**Non-compliance with MAS TRM risks supervisory actions including fines (e.g., S$27.45 million across nine FIs for related lapses), license revocation, and executive prohibition orders.** MAS considers TRM observance in supervision (Section 2.2), leading to remediation directives, reputational damage, and operational disruptions from unaddressed technology risks.

Can **MAS TRM** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MAS TRM aligns with outcomes in NIST CSF 2.0 (e.g., Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover-Govern) and ISO 27001's ISMS controls.** It supports hybrid approaches: NIST for ERM integration via CSRRs (IR 8286) and ISO for certifiable Annex A controls, with MAS emphasizing proportionality and board oversight.

What is the first step to begin implementing **MAS TRM**?

**The first step is Board approval of a technology risk appetite/tolerance statement and establishment of an independent TRM function (Section 3.1.7).** This enables asset inventory creation (Section 3.3), risk identification (Section 4.2), and proportional control design across governance, operations, and resilience.

AS9100 vs MAS TRM

Standards Comparison

AS9100

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace quality management system extending ISO 9001

MAS TRM

Mandatory

2021

Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management

Quick Verdict

AS9100 ensures aerospace QMS integrity for aviation suppliers worldwide, while MAS TRM mandates tech risk governance for Singapore FIs. Organizations adopt AS9100 for OEM contracts and MAS TRM to meet supervisory scrutiny and cyber resilience.

Quality Management

AS9100

AS9100D:2016 Quality Management Systems for Aerospace

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Explicit product safety controls across lifecycle (8.1.3)
Counterfeit parts prevention processes (8.1.4)
Configuration management for design integrity (8.1.2)
Operational risk management in production (8.1.1)
Enhanced supplier controls and traceability (8.4)

Technology Risk Management

MAS TRM

Technology Risk Management Guidelines

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board-level technology risk accountability
Proportionality based on risk and complexity
Third-party risk management integration
Annual penetration testing for internet systems
Defence-in-depth cyber resilience controls

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

AS9100 Details

What It Is

AS9100D:2016 is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, focusing on safety-critical industries. Primary purpose: ensure product integrity, safety, and supply chain reliability via a process-based, risk-based thinking approach across 10 clauses.

Key Components

Aerospace additions: product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), configuration management (8.1.2), operational risks (8.1.1).
Built on ISO 9001's Annex SL structure; emphasizes leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Certification via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, annual surveillance, triennial recert).

Why Organizations Use It

Contractual mandates from OEMs/primes for market access.
Reduces defects, escapes, rework; improves delivery, supplier performance.
Manages catastrophic risks (safety events, counterfeits); builds stakeholder trust via OASIS visibility.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-18 months).
Applies to designers/manufacturers/suppliers globally; cross-functional effort needed.

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines from Singapore's Monetary Authority for financial institutions (FIs). They outline a risk-based framework for governing technology and cyber risks, emphasizing proportionality to FI size, complexity, and exposure across governance, operations, cybersecurity, and resilience.

Key Components

15 sections spanning governance, asset management, secure SDLC, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, testing, and audit.
Core principles: board accountability, defence-in-depth, CIA triad protection, continuous improvement.
No fixed controls; expects practices like annual pen testing for internet-facing systems.
Compliance via supervisory review, no certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for Singapore FIs to mitigate enforcement risks (fines, revocations).
Enhances resilience, integrates with ERM, protects reputation.
Reduces systemic vulnerabilities, builds customer trust.

Implementation Overview

Phased: establish governance, build inventories, deploy controls, test resilience, monitor continuously.
Targets banks, insurers, fintechs under MAS; scalable by risk profile.
Involves board-approved strategies, independent assurance.

Key Differences

Aspect	AS9100	MAS TRM
Scope	Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls	Technology/cyber risk governance, resilience for financial IT
Industry	Aviation, space, defense manufacturers globally	Singapore-regulated financial institutions only
Nature	Voluntary certification standard (IAQG)	Supervisory guidelines with enforcement consideration
Testing	Third-party certification audits, Stage 1/2, surveillance	VA/PT annually for internet systems, DR tests, cyber exercises
Penalties	Loss of certification, market access denial	Fines, license conditions, supervisory actions

Scope

AS9100

Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls

MAS TRM

Technology/cyber risk governance, resilience for financial IT

Industry

AS9100

Aviation, space, defense manufacturers globally

MAS TRM

Singapore-regulated financial institutions only

Nature

AS9100

Voluntary certification standard (IAQG)

MAS TRM

Supervisory guidelines with enforcement consideration

Testing

AS9100

Third-party certification audits, Stage 1/2, surveillance

MAS TRM

VA/PT annually for internet systems, DR tests, cyber exercises

Penalties

AS9100

Loss of certification, market access denial

MAS TRM

Fines, license conditions, supervisory actions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AS9100 and MAS TRM

AS9100 FAQ

MAS TRM FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui

Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025

Unlock top 5 reasons TISAX tabletop exercises deliver 4:1 ROI preventing €10M+ supply chain breaches for ADAS Tier 1 suppliers. ENX case studies & VDA ISA contr

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CMMC vs EU AI Act

Compare CMMC vs EU AI Act: Decode DoD cybersecurity tiers vs EU AI risk rules. Master compliance strategies, pitfalls & global impacts for defense firms. Read now!

ITIL vs LEED

ITIL vs LEED: Compare ITSM best practices framework with green building certification. Align IT ops for efficiency or buildings for sustainability—key diffs, benefits inside. Choose wisely!

EU AI Act vs ISO 30301

EU AI Act vs ISO 30301: Compare AI risk rules with records management standards. Master compliance via documentation, risk controls & integration for seamless EU certification.

AS9100

MAS TRM

Quick Verdict

AS9100

Key Features

MAS TRM

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

AS9100 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

AS9100 FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9100?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9100?

Does AS9100 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9100 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9100?

Can AS9100 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9100?

MAS TRM FAQ

What is the primary objective of MAS TRM?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with MAS TRM?

Does MAS TRM require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for MAS TRM be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with MAS TRM?

Can MAS TRM be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing MAS TRM?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CMMC vs EU AI Act

ITIL vs LEED

EU AI Act vs ISO 30301