Standards Comparison

    AS9110C

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations

    VS

    23 NYCRR 500

    Mandatory
    2017

    NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity programs

    Quick Verdict

    AS9110C delivers QMS certification for aerospace MRO firms seeking market access, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity controls for NY financial entities to ensure compliance and avoid multimillion-dollar fines.

    Quality Management

    AS9110C

    AS9110C Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Tailored QMS for aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul
    • Strict configuration management and traceability controls
    • Counterfeit parts prevention and detection requirements
    • Operational risk-based thinking in planning and execution
    • Alignment with FAA/EASA Part-145 regulatory requirements
    Financial Services

    23 NYCRR 500

    23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Annual CEO/CISO dual-signature compliance certification
    • 72-hour notification for material cybersecurity incidents
    • Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged and remote access
    • Risk-based third-party service provider oversight policy
    • Annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    AS9110C Details

    What It Is

    AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an internationally recognized certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements using a process-based, risk-based thinking (RBT) approach across Clauses 4-10.

    Key Components

    • Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, continuing airworthiness.
    • Built on ISO High Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA cycle.
    • Requires third-party certification via accredited registrars.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Ensures regulatory alignment (FAA/EASA Part-145) and customer contracts.
    • Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework, improves on-time delivery.
    • Provides market access, OASIS listing, competitive differentiation.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through demonstrable QMS effectiveness.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification.
    • Applies to MROs of all sizes globally.
    • Involves leadership commitment, eQMS tools, IAQG auditor training.

    23 NYCRR 500 Details

    What It Is

    23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a prescriptive state-level mandate for financial services entities. It establishes minimum risk-based cybersecurity requirements to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems, applicable to Covered Entities like banks, insurers, and mortgage brokers operating in New York.

    Key Components

    • 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO appointment, risk assessments, MFA, encryption, TPSP oversight, penetration testing, and 72-hour incident reporting.
    • Built on risk-assessment-centric architecture with annual CEO/CISO certification and five-year record retention.
    • Phased compliance for Class A companies with enhanced controls like independent audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance avoids multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
    • Enhances resilience against threats, improves TPSP management, and builds stakeholder trust.
    • Provides competitive edge in financial services through evidence-based governance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Multi-phase: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment (MFA, asset inventory), testing, and evidence repository.
    • Targets NY-licensed financial entities; audits for Class A.
    • Involves board oversight, CISO reporting, and DFS timelines up to November 2025.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    AS9110C
    Aerospace MRO QMS with maintenance controls
    23 NYCRR 500
    Financial services cybersecurity program

    Industry

    AS9110C
    Aerospace maintenance global
    23 NYCRR 500
    NY financial services licensed entities

    Nature

    AS9110C
    Voluntary certification standard
    23 NYCRR 500
    Mandatory state regulation enforced

    Testing

    AS9110C
    Internal audits, management reviews
    23 NYCRR 500
    Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans

    Penalties

    AS9110C
    Certification loss, market exclusion
    23 NYCRR 500
    Fines, consent orders, license actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about AS9110C and 23 NYCRR 500

    AS9110C FAQ

    23 NYCRR 500 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages