OSHA
US regulation assuring safe workplace conditions nationwide
EPA
U.S. regulations for air, water, waste protection
Quick Verdict
OSHA ensures safe workplaces via hazard standards and inspections for all US employers, while EPA protects environment through emission limits and permits for polluting industries. Companies adopt both to avoid fines, reduce risks, and meet legal duties.
OSHA
29 CFR 1910 Occupational Safety and Health Standards
Key Features
- Enforces standards via 29 CFR 1910 for general industry
- General Duty Clause addresses recognized serious hazards
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizes engineering over PPE
- Mandates injury/illness recordkeeping and electronic reporting
- Risk-based inspections with escalating civil penalties
EPA
EPA Environmental Standards (40 CFR)
Key Features
- Multi-layered architecture: statutes, 40 CFR, permits
- Technology- and health-based performance standards
- Mandatory monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting systems
- Federal-state permitting and enforcement integration
- Dynamic rulemaking via Federal Register, Regulations.gov
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
OSHA Details
What It Is
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) enforces the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, a federal regulation codified in 29 CFR 1910 for general industry. Its primary purpose is assuring safe, healthful working conditions by reducing hazards through standards enforcement, inspections, and cooperative programs. It uses a performance-based approach with the General Duty Clause for uncodified hazards and a hierarchy of controls.
Key Components
- Organized into subparts (A-Z) covering walking surfaces, PPE, hazardous materials, toxic substances.
- Core elements: standards hierarchy, recordkeeping (Forms 300/300A/301), emergency plans, training.
- Built on employer/employee duties, NIOSH research, OSHRC adjudication.
- Compliance via inspections, citations, penalties up to $165,514.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legally mandatory for most U.S. employers to avoid fines, shutdowns.
- Reduces injuries, workers' comp costs, boosts productivity.
- Enhances reputation, meets state plans, aligns with IIPP best practices.
Implementation Overview
- Involves hazard assessments, written programs, training, engineering controls.
- Applies to general industry; scalable by size via consultations.
- No certification but enforced through prioritized inspections, electronic reporting.
EPA Details
What It Is
EPA standards are a family of legally binding U.S. federal regulations codified primarily in Title 40 CFR, implementing major statutes like the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Their primary purpose is environmental protection through risk management, blending health-based ambient standards (e.g., NAAQS) with technology-based controls (e.g., effluent guidelines, MACT). Scope covers air emissions, water discharges, hazardous waste, with site-specific permitting.
Key Components
- Numeric limits/thresholds, performance criteria, work practices.
- Permitting (NPDES, Title V, RCRA), monitoring/recordkeeping/reporting.
- Federal-state implementation, enforcement pathways.
- Over 100 parts in 40 CFR; no single certification, but permit compliance audited.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, operational shutdowns, liabilities. Drives risk reduction, ESG alignment, efficiency gains; builds stakeholder trust via transparency tools like ECHO.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, regulatory mapping, controls deployment, training, audits. Applies to industrial facilities across sectors; requires ongoing adaptation to rulemakings. No central certification; compliance via inspections, self-audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | OSHA | EPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Workplace safety and health hazards | Environmental protection across air, water, waste |
| Industry | All private sector industries, US-focused | Regulated industries emitting pollutants, US-wide |
| Nature | Mandatory occupational standards, civil enforcement | Mandatory environmental regulations, strict liability |
| Testing | Inspections, injury logs, exposure monitoring | Emissions sampling, DMRs, continuous monitoring |
| Penalties | Civil fines up to $165k willful, daily abatements | Civil penalties per day, criminal for knowing violations |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about OSHA and EPA
OSHA FAQ
EPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

CMMC Level 2 Implementation Guide for Small DIB Contractors: First 5 Steps to C3PAO Certification with Infographic
Actionable CMMC Level 2 guide for small DIB contractors: 5-step roadmap to C3PAO certification with infographic on timelines, costs & POA&Ms. Achieve DoD compli

NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates
Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
IEC 62443 vs ISO 13485
Compare IEC 62443 vs ISO 13485: OT cybersecurity vs medical QMS standards. Key differences, synergies & integration tips for secure, compliant systems. Dive in now!
ISO 17025 vs ISO 56002
ISO 17025 vs ISO 56002: Lab competence for testing/calibration (impartiality, traceability) vs innovation management guidance. Boost lab validity & strategic edge. Compare now!
AS9100 vs 23 NYCRR 500
Compare AS9100 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Aerospace QMS mastery meets NYDFS cybersecurity mandates. Unlock risk strategies, compliance roadmaps, and implementation wins now.