AS9110C
Aerospace QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations
Basel III
Global framework for bank capital, leverage, and liquidity standards.
Quick Verdict
AS9110C provides QMS certification for aviation maintenance firms, ensuring safety and traceability. Basel III mandates capital/liquidity rules for banks to enhance resilience. MROs adopt AS9110C for contracts; banks comply with Basel III to avoid regulatory penalties.
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance
Key Features
- Configuration management and counterfeit parts prevention
- Risk-based thinking in operational planning (8.1.1)
- Dedicated safety policy with Accountable Manager
- Strict traceability and preservation controls
- External provider oversight for approved parts
Basel III
Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Key Features
- Strengthened CET1 capital minimum (4.5% of RWA)
- Non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop (3%)
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for structural resilience
- Capital buffers with distribution constraints
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an internationally recognized certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance organizations (MROs). It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific additions for continuing airworthiness, using a risk-based thinking approach via Annex SL HLS and PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
- Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit prevention, product safety, human factors, traceability
- Integrated risk management (Clauses 6.1, 8.1.1); documented information replacing procedures
- Certification via IAQG OASIS after audits demonstrating full QMS operation
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part 145)
- Mitigates safety risks, ensures traceability/airworthiness
- Enhances market access, on-time delivery, customer satisfaction
- Builds stakeholder trust through auditable evidence
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-12 months typical)
- Applies to MROs globally regardless of size; requires operational maturity pre-audit
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the global regulatory framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) following the 2007-2009 financial crisis. It establishes prudential standards to strengthen bank resilience through enhanced capital quality and quantity, leverage constraints, and liquidity requirements. The approach combines risk-weighted assets (RWA) with non-risk-based backstops for simplicity and comparability.
Key Components
- **Pillar 1Capital ratios (CET1 ≥4.5%, Tier 1 ≥6%, Total ≥8%), leverage ratio (≥3%), LCR (100% for 30-day stress), NSFR (≥100% for 1-year funding).
- **Pillar 2Supervisory review process (ICAAP, stress testing).
- **Pillar 3Standardized disclosures (RWA comparability, leverage templates).
- Buffers: Capital conservation (2.5% CET1), countercyclical, G-SIB/D-SIB. Compliance via national implementation, no global certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Primarily mandatory for internationally active banks to meet jurisdictional laws, reducing systemic risk and model over-reliance. Benefits include usable buffers in stress, lower funding costs, improved comparability, and strategic balance-sheet optimization.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise program: gap analysis, data/system builds, model validation, governance. Applies to large banks globally; involves audits, no formal certification but RCAP assessments.
Key Differences
| Aspect | AS9110C | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Aerospace MRO quality management systems | Bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards |
| Industry | Aviation maintenance organizations globally | Internationally active banks worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary QMS certification standard | Mandatory prudential regulatory framework |
| Testing | Internal audits, certification body audits | Supervisory reviews, stress tests, disclosures |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market exclusion | Fines, asset caps, operating restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about AS9110C and Basel III
AS9110C FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks
Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EPA vs ISO 14064
Compare EPA standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA) vs ISO 14064: mandatory U.S. regs vs voluntary GHG verification. Key diffs, compliance strategies—master both now!
SQF vs ISO 26000
Discover SQF vs ISO 26000: GFSI food safety cert vs SR guidance. Compare modules, HES benefits, compliance edge. Optimize your ops now!
PRINCE2 vs ISO 14064
PRINCE2 vs ISO 14064: Compare structured project governance (7 principles, practices, processes) with GHG standards for emissions tracking & verification. Boost compliance & sustainability—explore key differences now!