What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C’s primary objective is to enable aviation maintenance organizations to consistently meet customer and applicable statutory/regulatory requirements for products and services while enhancing customer satisfaction through effective application of a quality management system and continual improvement.** It applies to repair stations and MRO providers across civil and military sectors, incorporating ISO 9001:2015’s high-level structure (Clauses 4–10) with aviation-specific additions like configuration management, product safety, counterfeit parts prevention, traceability, preservation, and human factors controls. These ensure continuing airworthiness and risk-based operational planning (Clauses 6.1, 8.1.1).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to organizations whose primary business is aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul (MRO), or continuing airworthiness management services.** Target entities include independent repair stations, airline maintenance departments, engine/avionics shops, component overhaul facilities, and OEMs with autonomous MRO operations. It is required by major OEMs, airlines, and defense contracts for supplier qualification and OASIS listing; regulatory approvals (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145) often align with its QMS scope, though customer/regulatory requirements take precedence.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited bodies listed in the IAQG OASIS database.** Organizations must demonstrate full QMS implementation via Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (on-site effectiveness audit). The QMS must be fully operational for at least three months, including a full internal audit cycle and management review, prior to initial certification. Surveillance audits occur annually, with recertification every three years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, status, and results, with a full cycle covering all processes at least annually.** Management reviews occur at predetermined intervals aligned with business cycles, using performance data from monitoring (Clause 9.1), audits (Clause 9.2), and nonconformities (Clause 10.2). External surveillance audits are annual post-certification, ensuring continual suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks loss of certification, exclusion from contracts, regulatory sanctions, and operational disruptions.** It can lead to OASIS delisting, preventing supplier qualification; contract termination by OEMs/airlines; potential suspension of repair station approvals (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145); increased liability from maintenance errors due to weak controls like traceability or counterfeit prevention; and financial impacts from rework, AOG events, or fines.

Can **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C fully incorporates ISO 9001:2015’s Annex SL structure, enabling seamless mapping to its requirements across Clauses 4–10.** Its baseline alignment supports integrated management systems, with aviation additions (e.g., Clause 8 operational controls) justifying scope applicability. Organizations must document justifications for any non-applied requirements without affecting conformity responsibility.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step is to define the QMS scope, determine internal/external issues (Clause 4.1), and identify interested parties’ requirements (Clause 4.2), including regulatory approvals and customer mandates.** Conduct a gap analysis mapping existing processes to AS9110C clauses, prioritizing high-risk areas like operational planning (Clause 8). Secure executive sponsorship and form a cross-functional team for a phased implementation plan.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 30301**?

**ISO 30301 specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR) to create and control authoritative evidence of business activities.** It supports organizational mandate, mission, strategy, and goals through High-Level Structure clauses 4–10 and records-specific controls in Clause 8 and **Annex A (normative)**, ensuring authenticity, reliability, integrity, and usability across the records lifecycle.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 30301**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 30301, as it is a voluntary international standard applicable to any organization regardless of size, type, or sector.** Professionally, it is adopted by entities needing auditable records governance, such as those in regulated industries or pursuing self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification to demonstrate conformity with records policy.

Does **ISO 30301** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 30301 does not require external audit or third-party certification.** It offers three conformity pathways: self-assessment and self-declaration, external confirmation of self-declaration, or third-party certification by accredited bodies under ISO/IEC 17065, allowing organizations to select assurance levels based on stakeholder needs and risk profile.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 30301** be performed?

**ISO 30301 requires internal audits at planned intervals and management reviews at planned intervals to evaluate MSR performance.** Clause 9 mandates monitoring, measurement, analysis, evaluation, and internal audits to ensure ongoing conformity, effectiveness, suitability, and adequacy, with frequency determined by risks, objectives, and results of previous assessments.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 30301**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 30301 carries no direct penalties, as it is a voluntary standard without legal enforcement.** However, failure to conform may result in organizational risks such as inability to produce reliable evidence for audits, litigation disadvantages, regulatory non-conformance in record-dependent obligations, operational inefficiencies, and loss of certification if pursued.

Can **ISO 30301** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 30301 aligns with the High-Level Structure (Annex SL) shared by modern ISO management system standards.** Its clauses 4–10 enable integration and mapping of MSR elements like records requirements (4.1.2), operational controls (Clause 8, Annex A), and performance evaluation (Clause 9) to compatible frameworks, supported by informative annexes for cross-referencing.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 30301**?

**The first step to implement ISO 30301 is determining the context of the organization per Clause 4, including understanding internal/external issues, records requirements (4.1.2), and interested parties.** This informs MSR scope (4.3), risks/opportunities (Clause 6.1), and foundational policy (Clause 5.2), enabling risk-based design of objectives and operational controls.

AS9110C vs ISO 30301

Standards Comparison

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations

ISO 30301

Voluntary

2019

International standard for records management systems

Quick Verdict

AS9110C delivers aerospace MRO quality controls for aviation safety, while ISO 30301 establishes records management systems for evidential governance. Aviation firms adopt AS9110C for compliance and contracts; all organizations use ISO 30301 for accountability and risk mitigation.

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C:2016 Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Tailored QMS for aviation maintenance organizations
Configuration management and traceability controls
Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
Risk-based thinking in operational planning
Human factors in root cause analysis

Records Management

ISO 30301

ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

High-Level Structure for MSS integration
Records lifecycle operational controls (Clause 8, Annex A)
Explicit records requirements analysis (4.1.2)
Flexible conformity pathways (self-declaration to certification)
Top management accountability and risk-based planning

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C:2016 is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance organizations (MROs), building on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements. Its primary purpose is ensuring continuing airworthiness through controlled maintenance processes. It employs risk-based thinking, PDCA cycle, and Annex SL structure.

Key Components

Core clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, product safety, human factors, traceability.
No fixed control count; focuses on documented information and process effectiveness.
IAQG certification via OASIS database.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part 145).
Mitigates safety risks, ensures traceability for airworthiness.
Enhances market access, on-time delivery, customer satisfaction.
Builds stakeholder trust through auditable evidence.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months typical).
Applies to MROs of all sizes globally.
Requires internal audits, management review, external certification.

ISO 30301 Details

What It Is

ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is an international certification standard for establishing a Management System for Records (MSR). It applies to any organization, focusing on creating, controlling, and preserving reliable evidence of business activities through a risk-based, governance-driven approach using the High-Level Structure (HLS).

Key Components

**Clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
**Clause 8 & Annex ARecords lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
Built on ISO 15489 principles (authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability).
Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures compliance, auditability, and transparency.
Mitigates risks like data loss, litigation, regulatory fines.
Boosts efficiency, decision-making, stakeholder trust.
Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for unified governance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits.
Scalable for any size/sector; 12-18 months typical.
Requires leadership commitment, training, system integration.

Key Differences

Aspect	AS9110C	ISO 30301
Scope	Aerospace MRO quality management	Records management systems governance
Industry	Aviation maintenance organizations globally	All organizations worldwide
Nature	Voluntary QMS certification standard	Voluntary records MSR certification
Testing	Certification audits, internal audits	Internal audits, management reviews
Penalties	Loss of certification, market exclusion	Loss of certification, no legal penalties

Scope

AS9110C

Aerospace MRO quality management

ISO 30301

Records management systems governance

Industry

AS9110C

Aviation maintenance organizations globally

ISO 30301

All organizations worldwide

Nature

AS9110C

Voluntary QMS certification standard

ISO 30301

Voluntary records MSR certification

Testing

AS9110C

Certification audits, internal audits

ISO 30301

Internal audits, management reviews

Penalties

AS9110C

Loss of certification, market exclusion

ISO 30301

Loss of certification, no legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AS9110C and ISO 30301

AS9110C FAQ

ISO 30301 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)

Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CMMC vs HITRUST CSF

Compare CMMC vs HITRUST CSF: DoD's NIST-based tiers for DIB security vs healthcare's harmonized, certifiable controls. Uncover differences, levels & pick your compliance path now.

ITIL vs AS9120B

ITIL vs AS9120B: Compare ITSM's flexible ITIL 4 practices with aerospace QMS rigor. Align IT services, boost compliance, cut risks—discover which drives your ops best!

AEO vs TOGAF

Compare AEO vs TOGAF: Customs compliance powerhouse vs enterprise architecture framework. Boost supply chain security, IT governance & ROI—discover key differences now!

AS9110C

ISO 30301

Quick Verdict

AS9110C

Key Features

ISO 30301

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 30301 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

Can AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

ISO 30301 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 30301?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 30301?

Does ISO 30301 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 30301 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 30301?

Can ISO 30301 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 30301?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CMMC vs HITRUST CSF

ITIL vs AS9120B

AEO vs TOGAF