AS9110C
Aerospace QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC regulation for cybersecurity incident disclosures
Quick Verdict
AS9110C provides QMS certification for aerospace MROs ensuring maintenance safety, while U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules mandate rapid incident disclosures for public firms enhancing investor transparency on cyber risks.
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance
Key Features
- Tailored QMS for aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul
- Counterfeit parts prevention and detection controls
- Configuration management and traceability requirements
- Risk-based thinking integrated in planning, operations
- Human factors and product safety considerations
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day material incident disclosure on Form 8-K
- Annual risk management and governance in Item 106
- Board oversight and management role disclosures
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data
- Third-party risk processes inclusion
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements for safety-critical maintenance processes, using a risk-based thinking (RBT) and PDCA approach across Clauses 4-10.
Key Components
- Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit prevention, human factors, traceability, release controls.
- Built on Annex SL high-level structure; no fixed control count, but requires documented information for all applicable clauses.
- Third-party certification via accredited registrars, with operational evidence prerequisite.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part-145).
- Mitigates safety risks, ensures airworthiness, prevents costly nonconformities.
- Enables market access via IAQG OASIS listing, boosts efficiency and competitiveness.
- Builds stakeholder trust through demonstrable QMS maturity.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification.
- Applies to MROs of all sizes globally; 6-12 months typical.
- Requires executive sponsorship, eQMS tools, auditor training.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) is a federal regulation mandating standardized disclosures for public companies. It requires timely reporting of material cybersecurity incidents and annual details on risk management, strategy, and governance, applying a materiality-based approach under securities law.
Key Components
- **Form 8-K Item 1.05Four-business-day disclosure of material incidents' nature, scope, timing, and impacts.
- **Regulation S-K Item 106Annual descriptions of risk processes, board oversight, and management's role.
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data.
- No fixed controls; focuses on processes and governance for all Exchange Act registrants.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances investor protection via uniform, timely information on cyber risks. Meets legal obligations for public filers, reduces information asymmetry, improves capital efficiency, and strengthens board accountability amid rising threats like ransomware and supply-chain attacks.
Implementation Overview
Involves cross-functional playbooks, materiality frameworks, incident workflows, and governance documentation. Applies to all U.S. public companies; phased compliance (Dec 2023 onward). No certification, but SEC enforcement via disclosure controls; requires process integration and testing.
Key Differences
| Aspect | AS9110C | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Aerospace MRO QMS with maintenance controls | Public company cyber incident disclosures |
| Industry | Aerospace maintenance organizations globally | U.S. public companies all sectors |
| Nature | Voluntary certification standard (IAQG) | Mandatory SEC reporting regulation |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, certification | Materiality assessments, disclosure controls |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market exclusion | SEC fines, enforcement actions, litigation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about AS9110C and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
AS9110C FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026
Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the
Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance
Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!
HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025
Unpack MyCSF's AI features for HITRUST CSF: automate evidence tagging, maturity scoring & monitoring for R2 renewals amid 2025 regs. CISOs in healthcare/fintech
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GRI vs AS9110C
Explore GRI vs AS9110C: Sustainability reporting (GRI 403 OHS) meets aerospace MRO quality mgmt. Key diffs in HES compliance, risk & certification. Align for excellence now!
PIPEDA vs J-SOX
Unlock PIPEDA vs J-SOX: Canada's privacy law vs Japan's financial controls. Master key differences, compliance pitfalls & strategies for global success. Compare now!
FSSC 22000 vs IATF 16949
Unlock FSSC 22000 vs IATF 16949: Compare food safety & automotive QMS standards. Key differences, requirements & implementation tips for supply chain success. Dive in!