What is the primary objective of **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B establishes a quality management system (QMS) for organizations that procure, store, split, and resell aerospace parts without altering product characteristics.** Built on ISO 9001:2015’s 10-clause structure, it adds over 100 aerospace-specific requirements targeting distribution risks like traceability loss, counterfeit parts infiltration, documentation errors, and external provider weaknesses. Core focus includes chain-of-custody preservation via identification/traceability (Clause 8.5.2), counterfeit/suspected unapproved parts prevention (Clauses 8.1.4-8.1.5), configuration management (Clause 8.1.2), and strengthened supplier controls (Clause 8.4).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B applies to aviation, space, and defense distributors that purchase, store, split, or resell parts without modifying conformity.** It targets stockist distributors, pass-through distributors, and batch splitters, excluding value-added activities like machining or MRO. Certification is not legally mandatory but commercially essential, often required by OEMs/Tier 1 suppliers for supply chain approval; ~2,442 global certifications (836 U.S.) as of 2023 signal de facto market entry via IAQG OASIS listing.

Does **AS9120B** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9120B requires third-party certification through accredited registrars via Stage 1 (documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation) audits per AS9101F.** Organizations must demonstrate QMS effectiveness, with ongoing surveillance audits annually and recertification every 3 years. IAQG oversight ensures consistency; certification lists in OASIS for supplier visibility.

How often should an assessment for **AS9120B** be performed?

**AS9120B requires internal audits at planned intervals to cover all processes annually, plus management reviews at defined intervals aligning with strategic direction.** Clause 9.2 mandates audit programs evaluating QMS conformity and effectiveness; Clause 9.3 requires reviews incorporating performance data, risks, audits, and supplier trends. External surveillance audits occur yearly post-certification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9120B**?

**Non-compliance with AS9120B risks commercial exclusion from OEM supply chains, audit nonconformities, and supply chain safety liabilities.** Lacking certification prevents OASIS listing and contract awards; operational failures (e.g., traceability breaks, counterfeit release) trigger recalls, returns, reputational damage, and potential regulatory scrutiny from FAA/EASA on product safety.

An **AS9120B** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, these FAQs focus solely on AS9120B as a standalone standard.** It aligns structurally with ISO 9001:2015 but includes unique distributor additions unverifiable here without cross-standard comparisons.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9120B**?

**The first step is conducting a formal gap analysis against AS9120B clauses using a tailored checklist to identify deficiencies in context, scope, and distributor controls.** Form a cross-functional team, document scope/“not applicable” justifications (Clause 4.3, e.g., 8.3 design), and prioritize risks like supplier evaluation and traceability per Clauses 6.1 and 8.

What is the primary objective of **EU AI Act**?

**The primary objective of the EU AI Act is to establish a risk-based regulatory framework that prohibits unacceptable-risk AI practices, imposes strict obligations on high-risk AI systems, mandates transparency for limited-risk systems, and fosters safe AI innovation while protecting health, safety, and fundamental rights.** Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, effective 1 August 2024, classifies AI into unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal risk tiers per Articles 5-6 and Annexes I-III.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **EU AI Act**?

**Providers, deployers, importers, distributors, and authorized representatives of AI systems whose outputs are used in the EU must comply with the EU AI Act, regardless of location.** Providers develop or place high-risk systems on the market (Article 3(3)); deployers are professional users (Article 3(4)). Scope includes third-country entities via EU output nexus (Article 2).

Does **EU AI Act** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**High-risk AI systems require conformity assessment, which may involve third-party notified bodies for certain Annex III uses or where internal assessment is insufficient (Articles 43-44, Annexes VI-VII).** Providers issue EU Declaration of Conformity and CE marking (Articles 47-48); notified bodies certify via audits (Articles 28-39). GPAI systemic-risk models face AI Office oversight (Article 55).

How often should an assessment for **EU AI Act** be performed?

**Risk classification and conformity assessments must occur before placing high-risk AI on the market or after substantial modifications, with continuous post-market monitoring (Article 72).** Providers document non-high-risk Annex III decisions pre-market (Article 6(4)); logs retained at least 6 months (Article 19). Periodic notified body surveillance audits apply where required.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **EU AI Act**?

**Non-compliance with the EU AI Act incurs tiered administrative fines up to 7% of worldwide annual turnover or €40 million for prohibited practices (Article 99).** High-risk failures up to 4% or €20 million; other violations up to 2% or €10 million. Additional remedies include market withdrawal, bans, and personal liability.

An **EU AI Act** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, the EU AI Act cannot be directly mapped to other international frameworks as it forms a standalone, directly applicable EU regulation without specified equivalences.** Compliance relies on its risk-based structure, harmonized standards (Article 40), and EU-specific conformity processes; organizations must address it independently per its text.

What is the first step to begin implementing **EU AI Act**?

**The first step to implement the EU AI Act is to conduct an AI inventory and classify all systems by risk tier against Article 5 prohibitions and Article 6/Annexes I-III criteria.** Document classifications, especially non-high-risk Annex III decisions, to confirm scope and prioritize high-risk obligations.

AS9120B vs EU AI Act

Standards Comparison

AS9120B

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for parts distributors

EU AI Act

Mandatory

2024

EU regulation for risk-based AI governance

Quick Verdict

AS9120B ensures quality management for aerospace distributors via traceability and audits, while EU AI Act mandates risk-based compliance for AI systems with conformity assessments. Distributors certify for supply chain access; AI firms comply to avoid massive fines and gain EU market trust.

Quality Management

AS9120B

AS9120B: Quality Management Systems for Distributors

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Prevents counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts
Ensures robust traceability and chain-of-custody controls
Strengthens external provider evaluation and flowdown
Implements configuration management for split lots
Enhances product safety and ethical awareness

Artificial Intelligence

EU AI Act

Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Risk-based four-tier AI classification framework
Prohibitions on unacceptable AI practices
High-risk conformity assessments and CE marking
GPAI model systemic risk obligations
Post-market monitoring and incident reporting

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

AS9120B Details

What It Is

AS9120B is the IAQG certification standard for quality management systems in aviation, space, and defense distributors. Built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure, it targets organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without alteration. Primary purpose: mitigate distribution risks like traceability loss and counterfeits via risk-based planning and operational controls.

Key Components

Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
100+ aerospace additions: counterfeit prevention, traceability, external providers, configuration management, preservation
Core on PDCA, risk thinking; certification by accredited bodies with OASIS listing

Why Organizations Use It

Commercial must-have for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains
Reduces risks of nonconformities, recalls, liabilities
Boosts efficiency, market access, customer confidence
Enhances reputation via global certification visibility

Implementation Overview

Phased 6-12 months: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification
Applies to global distributors, scalable for multi-site; requires documented evidence, leadership commitment

EU AI Act Details

What It Is

The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is a comprehensive regulation for AI systems across the EU. It ensures safe, transparent AI respecting fundamental rights through a risk-based approach, tiering systems as unacceptable, high-risk, limited-risk, or minimal-risk.

Key Components

Prohibited practices (Article 5); high-risk obligations (Articles 9-15: risk management, data governance, documentation, oversight, cybersecurity)
GPAI model rules (Chapter V); transparency duties (Article 50)
Conformity assessments, CE marking, EU database registration
Hybrid enforcement: AI Office, national authorities; fines up to 7% global turnover Built on product safety frameworks with lifecycle controls.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for EU-market AI providers/deployers
Avoids severe penalties, market bans
Enhances trust, competitiveness, AI quality
Meets stakeholder demands for ethical AI

Implementation Overview

Phased (6-36 months): inventory/classify AI, build RMS/QMS, conduct assessments, monitor post-market. Targets all sizes/industries with EU nexus; involves notified bodies for audits.

Key Differences

Aspect	AS9120B	EU AI Act
Scope	Aerospace distributor QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention	Risk-based AI systems regulation, high-risk lifecycle controls
Industry	Aerospace distribution, global certifications	All sectors using AI, EU extraterritorial reach
Nature	Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001	Mandatory EU regulation with phased enforcement
Testing	Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits	Conformity assessments, notified body reviews, post-market monitoring
Penalties	Loss of certification, market exclusion	Fines up to 7% global turnover, prohibitions

Scope

AS9120B

Aerospace distributor QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention

EU AI Act

Risk-based AI systems regulation, high-risk lifecycle controls

Industry

AS9120B

Aerospace distribution, global certifications

EU AI Act

All sectors using AI, EU extraterritorial reach

Nature

AS9120B

Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001

EU AI Act

Mandatory EU regulation with phased enforcement

Testing

AS9120B

Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

EU AI Act

Conformity assessments, notified body reviews, post-market monitoring

Penalties

AS9120B

Loss of certification, market exclusion

EU AI Act

Fines up to 7% global turnover, prohibitions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AS9120B and EU AI Act

AS9120B FAQ

EU AI Act FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025

Unpack MyCSF's AI features for HITRUST CSF: automate evidence tagging, maturity scoring & monitoring for R2 renewals amid 2025 regs. CISOs in healthcare/fintech

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

HIPAA vs AS9120B

Compare HIPAA vs AS9120B: Healthcare privacy/security rules vs aerospace distributor QMS. Uncover key differences, compliance tips & risks for regulated ops. Dive in now!

AS9110C vs ISO 27701

Compare AS9110C vs ISO 27701: Aerospace QMS excellence meets privacy management mastery. Discover key differences, overlaps & strategies for seamless compliance. Unlock insights now!

PMBOK vs BRC

PMBOK vs BRC: Compare project governance standards with food safety frameworks. Unlock tailoring, compliance strategies & implementation insights for optimal success. Dive in now!

AS9120B

EU AI Act

Quick Verdict

AS9120B

Key Features

EU AI Act

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

AS9120B Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

EU AI Act Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

AS9120B FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9120B?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9120B?

Does AS9120B require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9120B be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9120B?

An AS9120B be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9120B?

EU AI Act FAQ

What is the primary objective of EU AI Act?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with EU AI Act?

Does EU AI Act require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for EU AI Act be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with EU AI Act?

An EU AI Act be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing EU AI Act?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

HIPAA vs AS9120B

AS9110C vs ISO 27701

PMBOK vs BRC