What is the primary objective of **CAA**?

**The primary objective of the Clean Air Act (CAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq., is to protect public health and welfare from air pollution through National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six criteria pollutants and enforceable emission controls.** NAAQS under CAA §109 set primary (health) and secondary (welfare) limits for ozone (0.070 ppm 8-hour), PM2.5 (9.0 μg/m³ annual), SO2 (75 ppb 1-hour), NO2, CO, and lead. The Act mandates State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to attain standards, technology-based standards like NSPS (§111) and MACT (§112) for stationary sources, Title II mobile source rules, Title V permits, and enforcement via penalties and sanctions.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CAA**?

**All operators of stationary and mobile sources emitting criteria pollutants or hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) in the U.S. must comply with CAA, with major sources defined as ≥100 tpy criteria pollutants or ≥10 tpy single HAP/≥25 tpy combined HAPs.** Title V requires operating permits for major stationary sources; NSPS/MACT apply to new/modified sources in listed categories (e.g., nonmetallic mineral processing). States implement via SIPs, with EPA oversight; nonattainment areas impose stricter NSR thresholds (e.g., 10 tpy VOC/NOx). Executives in manufacturing, energy, and transport manage compliance.

Does **CAA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**CAA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires self-certification of Title V permit compliance and EPA-approved monitoring/reporting.** Major sources submit semiannual deviation reports and annual certifications; stack tests and CEMS data go to CEDRI/WebFIRE. EPA conducts inspections/enforcement; states may require audits. Infrastructure SIPs demand states prove enforcement capacity under §110(a)(2).

How often should an assessment for **CAA** be performed?

**CAA assessments must align with permit cycles: Title V renewals every 5 years, RMP updates every 5 years, and infrastructure SIPs within 3 years of new NAAQS.** NSPS/MACT require periodic residual risk/technology reviews (≥8 years); CEMS QA per Appendix F (daily/quarterly); stack tests per permit (often annual). Ozone reclassifications trigger SIPs within 18 months or January 1 of attainment year (2025 rule, 90 FR 5651).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CAA**?

**Non-compliance with CAA triggers administrative penalties up to $200,000 per action (§113), civil fines, DOJ judicial enforcement, citizen suits, and SIP failure sanctions like 2-to-1 offsets and highway fund bans.** EPA may impose FIPs; criminal liability applies for knowing violations. In one year, criminal cases yielded $149M fines/$214M forfeitures.

Can **CAA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, these FAQs address CAA independently per instructions; mapping is outside scope.**

What is the first step to begin implementing **CAA**?

**The first step for CAA implementation is a process-level applicability assessment using EPA's ADI Dashboard and emissions inventory per NAAQS/NSPS/MACT thresholds.** Inventory units for PTE, check SIP status via Green Book, prioritize CEMS/stack testing over AP-42 factors, and query state rules.

What is the primary objective of **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B establishes quality management system requirements for aerospace distributors that procure, store, split, and resell parts without altering product characteristics.** Built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure, it adds over 100 IAQG-specific controls targeting distribution risks like traceability loss, counterfeit parts infiltration, documentation errors, and external provider weaknesses. Core focus includes chain-of-custody preservation via identification/traceability (Clause 8.5.2), counterfeit prevention (Clauses 8.1.4/8.1.5), configuration management (8.1.2), and robust supplier evaluation (8.4).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B applies to aviation, space, and defense distributors performing purchase, storage, splitting, or resale without affecting product conformity.** It targets stockist distributors, pass-through distributors, and batch splitters, excluding value-added activities like machining or MRO. Certification is not legally mandatory but commercially essential, often required by OEMs and primes for supply chain approval; ~2,442 global certifications (836 U.S.) as of 2023 enable OASIS listing and market access.

Does **AS9120B** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**AS9120B requires third-party certification through accredited bodies via Stage 1 (documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation) audits per AS9101F.** Internal audits (Clause 9.2) at planned intervals provide ongoing verification, but external certification demonstrates compliance, lists organizations in IAQG's OASIS database, and meets OEM prerequisites; surveillance audits follow annually, recertification every 3 years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9120B** be performed?

**AS9120B mandates internal audits at planned intervals to cover the QMS annually (Clause 9.2), with management reviews at defined intervals (Clause 9.3).** Assessments evaluate conformity to requirements, effectiveness, and risks; frequency depends on risks, results, and changes, typically quarterly for reviews and full coverage yearly via process-based audits using PEAR/Turtle diagrams.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9120B**?

**Non-compliance with AS9120B risks contract disqualification, supply chain exclusion, and liability for safety incidents like counterfeit parts or traceability failures.** No direct legal penalties exist, but OEMs impose de facto requirements; audit findings lead to major nonconformities, corrective actions, certification suspension, reputational damage, recalls, and revenue loss from lost bids.

An **AS9120B** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**AS9120B aligns directly with ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure, enabling seamless mapping of its 10 clauses.** Aerospace additions (e.g., counterfeit prevention, traceability) build on ISO baseline without exclusions; organizations with ISO 9001 achieve ~75% compliance but must address ~100 IAQG-specific requirements for full equivalence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9120B**?

**Conduct a formal gap analysis against AS9120B clauses using cross-functional teams and checklists (Clauses 4-10).** Document scope (4.3), justify not-applicable items (e.g., 8.3 design), identify risks/interested parties (4.1/4.2), and prioritize distributor controls like supplier evaluation (8.4) and traceability (8.5.2) for a risk-based implementation backlog.

CAA vs AS9120B

Standards Comparison

CAA

Mandatory

1970

U.S. federal law regulating stationary and mobile air emissions

AS9120B

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for distributors ensuring traceability and authenticity.

Quick Verdict

CAA mandates air emission controls and permits for US industries to protect health, while AS9120B is a voluntary QMS certification for aerospace distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention. Companies adopt CAA for legal compliance; AS9120B for supply chain access.

Air Quality

CAA

Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Establishes NAAQS for six criteria pollutants
Mandates SIPs for attainment and planning
Imposes NSPS and MACT emission standards
Requires Title V operating permits consolidation
Enables multi-level enforcement and sanctions

Quality Management

AS9120B

AS9120B Quality Management Systems – Requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Prevents counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts
Ensures robust traceability and chain-of-custody controls
Strengthens external provider evaluation and flowdown
Implements configuration management for distribution
Mandates risk-based operational planning and preservation

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

CAA Details

What It Is

Clean Air Act (CAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq., is a comprehensive U.S. federal statute. It establishes national air quality standards and emission controls for stationary and mobile sources. Primary purpose: protect public health and welfare via cooperative federalism—EPA sets floors, states implement through SIPs. Approach combines ambient NAAQS with technology-based standards.

Key Components

NAAQS for six criteria pollutants (ozone, PM, CO, Pb, SO2, NO2) with primary/secondary levels.
SIPs, NSPS (§111), MACT/NESHAPs (§112), Title V permits, Title II mobile sources.
Enforcement via penalties, sanctions, citizen suits. No fixed control count; layered by source type.
Compliance via permits, monitoring, reporting.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for emitters; drives compliance to avoid fines, shutdowns, litigation. Reduces health/environmental risks, enables permitting for expansions. Strategic: lowers O&M via efficient controls, boosts ESG, ensures market access.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, permitting, controls installation, monitoring setup. Applies to major sources across industries; varies by state SIPs. No certification; audited via Title V renewals, EPA oversight. Cross-functional teams essential.

AS9120B Details

What It Is

AS9120B, officially Quality Management Systems – Requirements for aviation, space, and defense distributors, is a certification standard augmenting ISO 9001:2015. It applies to organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without alteration, employing a risk-based PDCA approach to mitigate supply chain hazards.

Key Components

Over 100 aerospace-specific requirements in 10-clause HLS.
Pillars: context/leadership (Clauses 4-5), planning/support (6-7), operations (traceability, counterfeit prevention in Clause 8), evaluation/improvement (9-10).
Built on ISO 9001; IAQG certification via accredited bodies and OASIS listing.

Why Organizations Use It

Commercial imperative for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
Mitigates counterfeit risks, traceability loss, documentation errors.
Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access (2,442 global certifications).
Drives efficiency, reduces liabilities.

Implementation Overview

Phased 6-12 months: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits.
Targets distributors globally; requires Stage 1/2 audits for certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	CAA	AS9120B
Scope	Air emissions, NAAQS, permits, enforcement	Aerospace distribution QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention
Industry	All industries with air emissions, US-focused	Aerospace parts distributors, global
Nature	Mandatory federal law with enforcement	Voluntary certification standard
Testing	CEMS, stack tests, continuous monitoring	Internal audits, certification audits
Penalties	Fines, sanctions, criminal liability	Loss of certification, market exclusion

Scope

CAA

Air emissions, NAAQS, permits, enforcement

AS9120B

Aerospace distribution QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention

Industry

CAA

All industries with air emissions, US-focused

AS9120B

Aerospace parts distributors, global

Nature

CAA

Mandatory federal law with enforcement

AS9120B

Voluntary certification standard

Testing

CAA

CEMS, stack tests, continuous monitoring

AS9120B

Internal audits, certification audits

Penalties

CAA

Fines, sanctions, criminal liability

AS9120B

Loss of certification, market exclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about CAA and AS9120B

CAA FAQ

AS9120B FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

OSHA vs ISO 13485

Discover OSHA vs ISO 13485: Compare US workplace safety standards to medical device QMS. Master compliance gaps, reduce risks, ensure regulatory success. Expert insights await!

Australian Privacy Act vs APRA CPS 234

Compare Australian Privacy Act vs APRA CPS 234: Principles-based privacy (APPs, NDB) meets prudential info security standards. Unlock compliance overlaps, risks & reforms. Dive in now!

ITIL vs ISO 14064

Discover ITIL vs ISO 14064: ITIL 4's agile ITSM framework with SVS & 34 practices vs ISO 14064's GHG standards for Scopes 1-3 reporting. Compare benefits, choose wisely!

CAA

AS9120B

Quick Verdict

CAA

Key Features

AS9120B

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

CAA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9120B Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

CAA FAQ

What is the primary objective of CAA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with CAA?

Does CAA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for CAA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with CAA?

Can CAA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing CAA?

AS9120B FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9120B?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9120B?

Does AS9120B require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9120B be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9120B?

An AS9120B be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9120B?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

OSHA vs ISO 13485

Australian Privacy Act vs APRA CPS 234

ITIL vs ISO 14064