What is the primary objective of **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B establishes a quality management system (QMS) for organizations that procure, store, split, and resell aerospace parts without altering product characteristics.** Built on ISO 9001:2015’s 10-clause structure, it adds over 100 aerospace-specific requirements addressing distribution risks like loss of traceability, counterfeit/suspected unapproved parts, documentation errors, and external provider controls to ensure chain-of-custody integrity.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B applies to stockist distributors, pass-through distributors, and those performing batch splitting in aviation, space, and defense supply chains.** Certification is not legally mandatory but is a commercial requirement imposed by OEMs and primes for market access; as of May 2023, 2,442 global certifications (836 in U.S.) underscore its role as a de facto qualification for ASD distributors excluding value-added modifiers or MRO entities.

Does **AS9120B** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9120B requires third-party certification through accredited bodies via Stage 1 (documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation) audits per AS9101, with ongoing surveillance and recertification every three years.** Certification enables OASIS listing in the IAQG ecosystem, providing supply chain visibility and customer confidence in QMS effectiveness.

How often should an assessment for **AS9120B** be performed?

**AS9120B requires internal audits at planned intervals to cover all processes annually, plus management reviews at defined intervals aligned with strategic direction.** Performance evaluation (Clause 9) mandates ongoing monitoring of KPIs, customer satisfaction, and risks, with full recertification audits every three years by accredited certification bodies.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9120B**?

**Non-compliance with AS9120B results in certification denial, surveillance audit findings, or decertification, leading to exclusion from OEM supplier lists and loss of market access.** Operationally, it risks supply chain disruptions, product recalls, counterfeit infiltration, and liabilities from traceability failures, with approximately 2,442 certified entities highlighting its role as a commercial gatekeeper.

An **AS9120B** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, AS9120B FAQs must stand alone without referencing other frameworks.** It is a standalone IAQG standard tailored for aerospace distribution, with its 10-clause HLS enabling internal integration where applicable, but mappings are organization-specific and not prescribed.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9120B**?

**The first step is conducting a gap analysis against AS9120B clauses using a certified checklist to identify deficiencies in context, scope, risks, and distributor controls.** Appoint a Management Representative, document QMS scope with “not applicable” justifications (e.g., Clause 8.3 design), and prioritize traceability, counterfeit prevention, and external provider controls.

What is the primary objective of **SAMA CSF**?

**The primary objective of SAMA CSF is to create a common approach for addressing cybersecurity across Member Organizations, achieve an appropriate maturity level of cybersecurity controls, and ensure cybersecurity risks are properly managed.** Version 1.0 (May 2017) prescribes principle-based controls across four domains—Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, and Third Party Cyber Security—using a six-level maturity model targeting at least Level 3 (Structured and Formalized).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAMA CSF**?

**SAMA CSF is mandatory for all SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia, including banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies, credit bureaus, and financial market infrastructure providers.** All domains apply fully to banks; non-banks have tailored exceptions (e.g., excluding payment systems unless handling cardholder data or SWIFT). Boards, senior management, CISOs, and third-party providers must ensure alignment.

Does **SAMA CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, SAMA CSF does not require external audit or third-party certification; compliance is enforced through periodic self-assessments using SAMA-provided questionnaires and direct supervisory review by SAMA.** Internal audits must align with the framework, with evidence of maturity Level 3+ (policies, standards, procedures, KPIs) maintained for SAMA audits.

How often should an assessment for **SAMA CSF** be performed?

**SAMA CSF requires periodic self-assessments using SAMA questionnaires, with annual reviews of critical information assets and more frequent assessments triggered by projects, changes, outsourcing, or new products.** Maturity levels (targeting Level 3+) must be evaluated regularly, with results documented for SAMA review, internal audits, and continuous improvement.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAMA CSF**?

**Non-compliance with SAMA CSF triggers regulatory enforcement including supervisory actions, remediation demands, elevated scrutiny, audit findings, and potential operational restrictions under SAMA's broader authority.** As a mandatory framework, failures increase incident risks, financial losses, reputational damage, and systemic threats, with SAMA expecting Level 3 maturity as baseline.

An **SAMA CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAMA CSF aligns conceptually with international frameworks such as NIST CSF, ISO/IEC 27001, PCI-DSS, BASEL, and SWIFT CSCF, enabling control mappings for integrated compliance.** Its principle-based structure and maturity model support leveraging existing implementations, though sector-specific controls (e.g., payment systems, e-banking) require tailored adaptations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAMA CSF**?

**The first step to implement SAMA CSF is to secure Board and Senior Management sponsorship, establish a project charter, and conduct a control-level gap analysis against the framework's domains using the maturity model.** Inventory applicable obligations, produce an initial maturity baseline (targeting Level 3), and form governance structures like the Cyber Security Committee.

AS9120B vs SAMA CSF

Standards Comparison

AS9120B

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for parts distributors and stockists

SAMA CSF

Mandatory

2017

Saudi framework for financial sector cybersecurity.

Quick Verdict

AS9120B ensures quality management for global aerospace distributors via certification, preventing counterfeit parts and maintaining traceability. SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms, enforcing governance and resilience against threats. Organizations adopt them for supply chain trust and regulatory compliance.

Quality Management

AS9120B

AS9120B:2016 Requirements for Aerospace Distributors

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
Enhanced traceability for split lots and chain-of-custody
Risk-based external provider evaluation and flowdown
Configuration management tailored to distribution operations
Product safety and ethical behavior awareness requirements

Cybersecurity

SAMA CSF

SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
Four core domains with detailed subdomains
Board-level governance and CISO requirements
Risk-based principle-oriented controls
Third-party risk management mandates

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

AS9120B Details

What It Is

AS9120B:2016 is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) tailored to aviation, space, and defense distributors that procure, store, split, and resell parts without alteration. Built on ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure, it employs a risk-based approach emphasizing traceability, counterfeit prevention, and supplier controls.

Key Components

Over 100 aerospace-specific requirements beyond ISO 9001.
Core clauses: context/leadership (4-5), planning/support (6-7), operations (8), evaluation/improvement (9-10).
Pillars: traceability, external provider management, preservation, nonconformity control.
IAQG certification via OASIS database listing.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets OEM/primes' commercial mandates for supply chain approval.
Mitigates risks like counterfeit infiltration and traceability loss.
Enhances market access, customer trust, operational efficiency.
Builds resilience against regulatory scrutiny and recalls.

Implementation Overview

Phased rollout (gap analysis, process design, training, audits) over 6-12 months.
Cross-functional teams prioritize supplier controls, IT traceability systems.
Applies to all distributor sizes; requires accredited third-party certification.

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF), Version 1.0 (May 2017), is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented approach to cybersecurity, focusing on governance, risk management, and controls to detect, resist, respond to, and recover from cyber threats across information assets.

Key Components

Four principal domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations.
Six-level maturity model (0: Non-existent to 5: Adaptive), targeting at least Level 3.
Aligned with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; enforced via self-assessments and SAMA audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance for banks, insurers, finance firms to avoid penalties, audits.
Enhances resilience, reduces incident risks, improves efficiency.
Builds trust, enables partnerships, supports Vision 2030 digital growth.

Implementation Overview

Phased: initiation, gap analysis, design, deployment, monitoring, improvement.
Applies to all SAMA entities; scalable by size.
Requires board governance, CISO, evidence portfolios; no external certification but SAMA review.

Key Differences

Aspect	AS9120B	SAMA CSF
Scope	Aerospace distribution QMS: traceability, counterfeit prevention	Financial sector cybersecurity: governance, risk, operations, third-party
Industry	Global aerospace distributors, all sizes	Saudi financial institutions (banks, insurance), mandatory
Nature	Voluntary IAQG certification standard	Mandatory regulatory framework by SAMA
Testing	Third-party certification audits, IAQG oversight	Self-assessments, SAMA audits, maturity model reviews
Penalties	Loss of certification, market exclusion	Fines, license suspension, regulatory enforcement

Scope

AS9120B

Aerospace distribution QMS: traceability, counterfeit prevention

SAMA CSF

Financial sector cybersecurity: governance, risk, operations, third-party

Industry

AS9120B

Global aerospace distributors, all sizes

SAMA CSF

Saudi financial institutions (banks, insurance), mandatory

Nature

AS9120B

Voluntary IAQG certification standard

SAMA CSF

Mandatory regulatory framework by SAMA

Testing

AS9120B

Third-party certification audits, IAQG oversight

SAMA CSF

Self-assessments, SAMA audits, maturity model reviews

Penalties

AS9120B

Loss of certification, market exclusion

SAMA CSF

Fines, license suspension, regulatory enforcement

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AS9120B and SAMA CSF

AS9120B FAQ

SAMA CSF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies

Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

TISAX vs ISO 17025

Explore TISAX vs ISO 17025: Automotive infosec vs lab competence standards. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for supply chain success. Choose wisely now!

SOC 2 vs ISO 30301

Compare SOC 2 vs ISO 30301: SOC 2 audits secure data controls for SaaS trust; ISO 30301 builds records governance. Unlock key differences, benefits & choose wisely today!

PCI DSS vs GDPR UK

Compare PCI DSS vs UK GDPR: Key differences in payment security & data protection. Uncover overlaps, compliance strategies & tips for UK firms to slash fines & boost resilience. (152)

AS9120B

SAMA CSF

Quick Verdict

AS9120B

Key Features

SAMA CSF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

AS9120B Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

AS9120B FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9120B?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9120B?

Does AS9120B require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9120B be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9120B?

An AS9120B be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9120B?

SAMA CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAMA CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAMA CSF?

Does SAMA CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAMA CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAMA CSF?

An SAMA CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAMA CSF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

TISAX vs ISO 17025

SOC 2 vs ISO 30301

PCI DSS vs GDPR UK