AS9120B
Aerospace QMS standard for parts distributors and stockists
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. regulation for public company cybersecurity disclosures.
Quick Verdict
AS9120B ensures aerospace distributor quality via traceability and counterfeit controls for supply chain approval, while U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules mandate public firms disclose material incidents and governance for investor transparency.
AS9120B
AS9120B Quality Management Systems for Distributors
Key Features
- Prevents counterfeit parts via verification and quarantine processes
- Ensures traceability for split lots and chain-of-custody
- Mandates configuration management using sales order records
- Requires risk-based external provider evaluation and flowdown
- Demands product safety and ethical behavior awareness training
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day material incident disclosure on Form 8-K
- Annual risk management, strategy, governance disclosures in Item 106
- Inline XBRL tagging for machine-readable cyber data
- Board oversight and management expertise requirements
- Inclusion of third-party systems in incident scope
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the official quality management system standard (AS9120 Rev B, 2016) for aviation, space, and defense distributors, built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure with over 100 aerospace-specific additions. It targets organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without altering characteristics, using a risk-based thinking approach to mitigate supply chain risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.
Key Components
- Core pillars: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operations, evaluation, improvement.
- Distributor emphases: counterfeit prevention, traceability for split lots, configuration management, external provider controls.
- Built on Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA); requires documented information, not full procedures.
- Certification via accredited bodies, listed in IAQG OASIS database.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access to OEMs/Tier 1 suppliers via ~2,442 global certifications.
- Reduces risks of nonconformities, recalls, and commercial exclusion.
- Builds trust through auditable chain-of-custody and supplier verification.
- Drives efficiency in inventory, delivery, and continual improvement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months typical).
- Applies to stockists/distributors globally; scales by size.
- Involves internal audits, management reviews, third-party Stage 1/2 certification.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) is a federal regulation mandating standardized disclosures for Exchange Act reporting companies. It requires timely reporting of material cybersecurity incidents and annual descriptions of risk management, strategy, and governance. The approach is materiality-based, aligning with securities law principles without bright-line thresholds.
Key Components
- **Form 8-K Item 1.05Four-business-day disclosure of material incidents' nature, scope, timing, and impacts.
- **Regulation S-K Item 106Annual disclosures on risk processes, third-party oversight, board oversight, and management's role/expertise.
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data comparability.
- Applies to domestic issuers (10-K/8-K) and FPIs (20-F/6-K); no certification but integrates with disclosure controls.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances investor protection via timely, uniform information; reduces asymmetry; supports capital efficiency. Mandatory for public companies to avoid enforcement; strengthens governance; builds stakeholder trust amid rising cyber threats.
Implementation Overview
Phased compliance (Dec 2023 onward); involves cross-functional playbooks, materiality frameworks, IRP updates, TPRM enhancements. Targets all public filers; requires process integration, training, XBRL readiness; no external certification but SEC review/enforcement.
Key Differences
| Aspect | AS9120B | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Aerospace distributor QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention | Public company cyber incident disclosure and governance |
| Industry | Aerospace distribution, global certifications | U.S. public companies, all sectors, SEC registrants |
| Nature | Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001 | Mandatory SEC disclosure regulation |
| Testing | IAQG audits, internal audits, management review | No formal testing; disclosure controls evaluation |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market exclusion | SEC enforcement, fines, civil penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about AS9120B and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
AS9120B FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs
Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
COBIT vs ISO 28000
COBIT vs ISO 28000: IT governance meets supply chain security. Compare frameworks for risk mgmt, compliance & resilience. Choose the best fit now!
GMP vs CSA
Compare GMP vs CSA: Key differences in standards, compliance strategies, historical roots, and implementation for pharma, safety, and manufacturing. Optimize regulatory readiness now.
ISO 14001 vs CMMI
Compare ISO 14001 vs CMMI: EMS for sustainability & compliance vs maturity model for process excellence. Discover key differences, benefits & implementation guide to boost performance today!