Basel III
Global framework strengthening bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
Basel III sets global bank capital/liquidity rules for financial stability, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity for NY firms. Banks adopt Basel for solvency; NY entities comply with 500 to avoid fines and protect data.
Basel III
Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Key Features
- 4.5% CET1 minimum with stricter capital quality
- 3% non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
- LCR requiring 100% HQLA for 30-day stress
- NSFR mandating stable funding over one year
- Capital buffers restricting payouts when breached
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- Annual CEO/CISO compliance certification
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification
- Phishing-resistant MFA for high-risk access
- Comprehensive TPSP risk management policy
- Risk-based penetration testing and vulnerability assessments
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the global regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-2007-2009 financial crisis. It sets prudential standards for banks, focusing on enhancing capital quality, constraining leverage, and ensuring liquidity resilience through a multi-metric "belts and suspenders" approach combining risk-based and non-risk-based measures.
Key Components
- **Pillar 1Minimum capital ratios (CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, Total 8%), leverage ratio (3%), LCR (100% HQLA for 30-day stress), NSFR (stable funding over one year), plus buffers (CCB 2.5%, CCyB up to 2.5%, G-SIB/D-SIB).
- **Pillar 2Supervisory review via ICAAP and stress testing.
- **Pillar 3Standardized disclosures for RWA comparability (e.g., KM1, LR1, CDC templates). Built on three-pillar structure with output floor constraining internal models.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks adopt Basel III for regulatory compliance, as jurisdictions implement it via domestic law. It boosts resilience, reduces systemic risk, improves market discipline, and shapes asset allocation and funding strategies. Enhances competitiveness through credible buffers and transparency.
Implementation Overview
Phased multi-year rollout via gap analysis, data architecture upgrades, model validation, and governance. Applies to internationally active banks globally; requires internal processes, no formal certification but supervisory assessments and Pillar 3 reporting. (178 words)
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a state-level mandate for financial services entities. It establishes minimum risk-based cybersecurity requirements to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems. The approach is prescriptive yet tailored via documented risk assessments.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO governance, MFA, encryption, access privileges, TPSP oversight, penetration testing, incident response, and annual certification.
- Built on risk assessment foundation (NIST CSF or equivalent); dual CEO/CISO annual certification with 5-year record retention.
- Class A companies face enhanced controls like independent audits and EDR.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for NY-licensed financial entities (banks, insurers, etc.) to avoid multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, builds stakeholder trust, lowers insurance premiums.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: governance setup, risk assessment, technical controls (MFA by 2025), TPSP contracts, testing.
- Applies to Covered Entities in NY financial sector; no certification but annual filing and DFS examinations.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Basel III | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards | Cybersecurity program, MFA, incident response |
| Industry | Global banking sector | NY financial services entities |
| Nature | Global prudential standard, implemented nationally | Mandatory NY state regulation |
| Testing | Pillar 2 stress tests, ICAAP reviews | Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans |
| Penalties | Supervisory capital add-ons, restrictions | Fines, consent orders, license actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Basel III and 23 NYCRR 500
Basel III FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation
Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20
Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ITIL vs COBIT
Discover ITIL vs COBIT: ITIL drives ITSM via 34 practices & SVS for agile services; COBIT governs IT with 40 objectives & design factors. Align IT-business—compare now!
DORA vs AS9120B
Compare DORA vs AS9120B: EU finance resilience act vs aerospace distributor QMS. Key differences, compliance strategies & implementation guide to excel in your sector. Dive in!
FERPA vs EMAS
Explore FERPA vs EMAS: US student privacy law meets EU eco-management scheme. Key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for global leaders. Dive in now!