GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/Basel III vs ISO 28000
    Standards Comparison

    Basel III vs ISO 28000

    Basel III

    Mandatory
    2010

    Global framework strengthening bank capital, leverage, liquidity resilience

    VS

    ISO 28000

    Voluntary
    2022

    International standard for supply chain security management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    Basel III enforces capital, leverage, and liquidity standards for global banks to ensure financial stability. ISO 28000 provides a voluntary security management framework for supply chains across industries. Banks adopt Basel III for regulatory compliance; others use ISO 28000 for resilience and certification.

    Financial Risk Management

    Basel III

    Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Elevates CET1 capital minimum to 4.5% plus buffers
    • Introduces 3% non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
    • Mandates LCR for 30-day HQLA stress coverage
    • Requires NSFR for one-year stable funding resilience
    • Imposes output floor constraining internal model RWAs
    Supply Chain Security

    ISO 28000

    ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems — Requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based supply chain threat assessment and treatment
    • PDCA cycle for continual security improvement
    • Leadership commitment and integrated SMS policy
    • Controls for external providers and processes
    • Alignment with ISO 31000 and ISO 22301

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Basel III Details

    What It Is

    Basel III is the global prudential regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-2007-09 financial crisis. It enhances bank resilience through higher-quality capital, leverage constraints, and liquidity standards. Its risk-based approach combines Pillar 1 minimums with supervisory review and disclosures.

    Key Components

    • **Three PillarsCapital requirements (CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, Total 8% + buffers), supervisory review (Pillar 2), market discipline (Pillar 3).
    • Capital buffers: Conservation (2.5%), countercyclical, G-SIB/D-SIB.
    • Leverage ratio (3%), LCR (100% HQLA for 30-day stress), NSFR (stable funding over 1 year).
    • Output floor (72.5% of standardized RWAs); no formal certification, but jurisdictional compliance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Banks adopt it for regulatory compliance, as jurisdictions mandate via domestic laws. It mitigates systemic risk, improves funding costs, enhances resilience against shocks, boosts investor confidence, and curbs arbitrage via comparability.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data/system upgrades, model validation, ICAAP integration. Applies to internationally active banks; varies by jurisdiction/size. Involves PMO governance, QIS testing, ongoing reporting—no central certification, but supervisory audits.

    ISO 28000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 28000:2022 — Security management systems — Requirements is an international certification standard specifying requirements for a security management system (SMS) to manage supply chain security risks. It employs a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle, aligned with ISO 31000 and ISO 22301.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Risk assessment/treatment processes.
    • Operational controls for processes, suppliers, equipment.
    • Internal audits, management reviews; certification per ISO 28003.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigate threats like theft, sabotage, disruptions.
    • Meet contractual, regulatory demands.
    • Reduce incidents, insurance costs.
    • Enhance resilience, market access, stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, audits.
    • Scalable for all sizes/industries.
    • Certification via accredited bodies (6–36 months typical).

    Key Differences

    AspectBasel IIIISO 28000
    ScopeBank capital, leverage, liquidity ratiosSupply chain security management system
    IndustryBanking sector globallyAll industries, supply chain focused
    NatureGlobal prudential regulatory standardsVoluntary management system certification
    TestingPillar 2 supervisory review, stress testsInternal audits, management reviews, certification
    PenaltiesRegulatory enforcement, capital restrictionsLoss of certification, no legal penalties

    Scope

    Basel III
    Bank capital, leverage, liquidity ratios
    ISO 28000
    Supply chain security management system

    Industry

    Basel III
    Banking sector globally
    ISO 28000
    All industries, supply chain focused

    Nature

    Basel III
    Global prudential regulatory standards
    ISO 28000
    Voluntary management system certification

    Testing

    Basel III
    Pillar 2 supervisory review, stress tests
    ISO 28000
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification

    Penalties

    Basel III
    Regulatory enforcement, capital restrictions
    ISO 28000
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Basel III and ISO 28000

    Basel III FAQ

    ISO 28000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

    Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

    How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

    Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

    Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

    Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!

    ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

    ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

    Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how Basel III and ISO 28000 compare against other standards

    Other Basel III Comparisons

    • PMBOK vs Basel III
    • ISO 56002 vs Basel III
    • C-TPAT vs Basel III
    • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs Basel III
    • ISO 37301 vs Basel III

    Other ISO 28000 Comparisons

    • ISO 37301 vs ISO 28000
    • ISO 56002 vs ISO 28000
    • ISO 21001 vs ISO 28000
    • C-TPAT vs ISO 28000
    • GLBA vs ISO 28000
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved