BRC
GFSI-benchmarked standard for food safety management
C-TPAT
Voluntary U.S. supply chain security partnership program
Quick Verdict
BRC ensures food safety and quality via HACCP audits for manufacturers worldwide, while C-TPAT secures supply chains against threats through CBP validations for US importers/carriers. Companies adopt BRC for retailer access, C-TPAT for faster border clearance.
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety
Key Features
- GFSI-benchmarked certification for food manufacturers
- Nine core clauses with fundamental requirements
- HACCP-based plan plus senior management commitment
- Risk-based environmental monitoring and zoning
- Grading system with unannounced audit options
C-TPAT
Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)
Key Features
- Risk-based supply chain security assessments
- Tailored Minimum Security Criteria by partner type
- Reduced CBP inspections and FAST lane access
- Annual security profile updates and validations
- Business partner vetting and cybersecurity controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a third-party certification framework for food manufacturers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system. Primary scope covers manufacturing, processing, and packing of processed foods, ingredients, primary products, and pet foods. Key approach combines senior management commitment with Codex HACCP-based plans and prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP).
Key Components
- Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP plan, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
- Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management, internal audits) are non-negotiable.
- Built on GFSI-benchmarked protocols with grading (AA/A/B/C/D).
- Certification via annual announced/unannounced audits by accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
Provides market access to retailers mandating GFSI schemes, reduces duplicate audits, evidences due diligence. Manages risks like recalls from allergens/pathogens/labelling. Builds trust, operational resilience, and aligns with regulations like FSMA.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, HACCP redesign, training, internal audits, mock audits. Applies to manufacturers globally; 6-12 months typical. Requires CAPA, root cause analysis for certification.
C-TPAT Details
What It Is
C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) is a voluntary public-private partnership framework administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Its primary purpose is to secure international supply chains against terrorism and crime while facilitating legitimate trade. It uses a risk-based approach with tailored Minimum Security Criteria (MSC) for partners like importers, carriers, and brokers.
Key Components
- 12 core MSC domains: risk assessment, business partners, cybersecurity, physical access, personnel security, conveyance security, seals, procedural security, agricultural security, training, audits, and incident response.
- Built on governance, evidence of implementation, and the 2021 Best Practices Framework.
- Compliance via annual security profiles and CBP validations; tiered benefits post-validation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces inspections, enables FAST lanes, and provides priority recovery.
- Enhances resilience, meets partner requirements, builds trust.
- Strategic for importers/exporters facing high volumes or risks.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, remediation, training, validation.
- Scalable for SMEs to globals; 6-12 months typical.
- CBP validations required; internal audits sustain compliance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | BRC | C-TPAT |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Food safety, quality, HACCP, site standards | Supply chain security, risk assessment, cyber controls |
| Industry | Food manufacturing, packaging, storage global | Importers, exporters, carriers US-focused trade |
| Nature | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification | Voluntary CBP partnership with validations |
| Testing | Third-party announced/unannounced audits | CBP risk-based validations, internal audits |
| Penalties | Grade downgrade, certification loss | Benefit suspension, removal from program |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about BRC and C-TPAT
BRC FAQ
C-TPAT FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
WCAG vs TISAX
Compare WCAG vs TISAX: Decode web accessibility (WCAG POUR principles, AA conformance) vs automotive security standards. Master compliance, cut risks, elevate governance. Dive in!
CSA vs FedRAMP
CSA vs FedRAMP: Compare Canadian OHS standards (Z1000/Z1002) for hazard control & safety mgmt vs US federal cloud security baselines. Key diffs, compliance guide.
GRI vs Australian Privacy Act
Explore GRI vs Australian Privacy Act: Decode overlaps in sustainability impacts, OHS disclosures & data privacy rules for HES leaders. Align frameworks, boost compliance now.