What is the primary objective of **BRC**?

**The primary objective of BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is to ensure the manufacture, processing, and packing of safe, legal, authentic, and quality food products through a structured management system.** It combines senior management commitment with a Codex HACCP-based food safety plan and prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP) to control contamination, mislabelling, fraud, and operational risks. Issue 8 organizes requirements into nine clauses, from governance to traded products, enabling third-party certification recognized by retailers worldwide.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **BRC**?

**BRCGS compliance is professionally required for food manufacturers, processors, and packers supplying major retailers, as it is a GFSI-benchmarked condition for market access.** It applies to sites producing processed foods, ingredients, primary products like fruit/vegetables, and domestic pet foods under direct management control. Retailers and brand owners mandate certification to reduce duplicative audits and assure due diligence; exclusions are limited to physically segregated, differentiable products.

Does **BRC** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, BRCGS requires annual external audits by accredited certification bodies, with options for announced or unannounced audits leading to third-party certification.** Audits assess compliance across nine clauses against fundamental requirements; grading (AA/A/B/C/D, with "+" for unannounced) depends on non-conformance severity. Certification is site-specific, valid for one year, with surveillance and potential withdrawal for major/critical issues.

How often should an assessment for **BRC** be performed?

**BRCGS requires annual third-party certification audits, plus internal audits at least four times yearly covering all clauses.** Internal audits must be scheduled across the year, risk-based, with full annual coverage; seasonal sites audit pre-startup. Management reviews occur annually, with monthly food safety meetings and quarterly objective reporting to sustain compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **BRC**?

**Non-compliance with BRCGS results in non-certification, grade downgrades, or withdrawal, blocking retailer supply chains.** Major non-conformities in fundamental clauses (e.g., HACCP, traceability) require root cause analysis and corrective actions within strict timeframes; critical issues trigger immediate suspension. Repeated failures increase audit frequency, incur costs, and risk contract loss or reputational damage from incidents like recalls.

Can **BRC** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, BRCGS maps effectively to GFSI-benchmarked frameworks, providing a foundation for regulatory alignment like FSMA Preventive Controls.** Its HACCP, PRPs, and governance exceed many requirements, though adaptations for terminology (e.g., PCQI designation) may be needed. Sites leverage it for multi-scheme interoperability without full recertification.

What is the first step to begin implementing **BRC**?

**The first step to implement BRCGS is securing senior management commitment via a signed food safety policy and resourced action plan.** Define scope (site/products), assemble a multidisciplinary team, and conduct a gap analysis against Issue 8/9 clauses using BRC tools like the Get Started Assessment to prioritize fundamentals like HACCP and site standards.

What is the primary objective of **SAMA CSF**?

**SAMA CSF's primary objective is to create a common cybersecurity approach across SAMA-regulated financial institutions, achieve appropriate maturity levels, and ensure proper management of cybersecurity risks.** Version 1.0 (May 2017) prescribes principles, objectives, and control considerations across four domains—Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, and Third Party Cyber Security—underpinned by a six-level maturity model targeting at least Level 3 (Structured and Formalized).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAMA CSF**?

**SAMA CSF is mandatory for all SAMA-regulated entities, including banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies, credit bureaus, and financial market infrastructure providers operating in Saudi Arabia.** Boards, senior management, CISOs, Chief Risk Officers, IT/Infosec leaders, and third-party risk managers bear direct responsibility; third-party providers must align services to enable customer compliance.

Does **SAMA CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAMA CSF requires periodic self-assessments using SAMA-provided questionnaires and internal audits, but does not mandate external third-party certification.** SAMA conducts supervisory reviews and audits; internal audits must follow accepted standards, with evidence from policies, KRIs, and control testing submitted for regulatory scrutiny.

How often should an assessment for **SAMA CSF** be performed?

**SAMA CSF assessments must be performed periodically, including annual reviews of critical assets and ongoing self-assessments against the maturity model.** Risk assessments occur at project initiation, before critical changes or outsourcing, and for new products; penetration testing targets customer-facing services annually, with maturity evidence updated continuously for SAMA review.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAMA CSF**?

**Non-compliance with SAMA CSF triggers regulatory enforcement, including supervisory actions, remediation demands, heightened scrutiny, audit findings, and potential operational restrictions.** As a mandated framework, violations invoke SAMA's broader supervisory powers over financial institutions, escalating to material risks like financial losses, reputational damage, and systemic interventions.

Can **SAMA CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAMA CSF aligns conceptually with frameworks like NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, and BASEL, enabling control mappings for integrated compliance.** Its principle-based structure and maturity model map to NIST functions (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover) and ISO 27001's ISMS, though SAMA adds sector-specific controls for payments and third parties; vendor mappings support dual implementations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAMA CSF**?

**The first step for SAMA CSF implementation is securing Board and senior management sponsorship, followed by a control-level gap analysis and initial maturity assessment.** Phase 1 (Initiation) involves forming governance (e.g., Cyber Security Committee), inventorying assets, and baselining against domains to produce a gap register targeting Level 3 maturity.

BRC vs SAMA CSF

Standards Comparison

BRC

Voluntary

2022

GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management

SAMA CSF

Mandatory

2017

Saudi regulatory framework for financial cybersecurity

Quick Verdict

BRC ensures food safety certification for global manufacturers via audits and HACCP, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi finance via self-assessments. Food firms adopt BRC for market access; banks use SAMA for regulatory compliance.

Food Safety

BRC

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

GFSI-benchmarked third-party food safety certification
Senior management commitment and culture plan
Codex HACCP with prerequisite program integration
Expanded environmental monitoring and food defense
Performance grading with unannounced audits

Cybersecurity

SAMA CSF

SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
Four domains with detailed subdomains and controls
Board-level governance and CISO requirements
Risk-based principle-oriented approach
Third-party risk management mandates

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

BRC Details

What It Is

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 is a GFSI-benchmarked third-party certification framework for food manufacturers, packers, and processors. It assures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality via a structured system emphasizing senior management commitment and Codex HACCP-based food safety plans supported by prerequisite programs.

Key Components

Seven core clauses covering management, HACCP, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, and personnel.
Fundamental requirements (e.g., internal audits, traceability, allergen management) essential for certification.
Risk zoning for high-risk/high-care areas; environmental monitoring; traded products module.
Annual graded audits (AA/A/B/C/D, + for unannounced).

Why Organizations Use It

Meets retailer mandates for supply chain access.
Mitigates recalls through robust hazard controls.
Demonstrates due diligence, builds stakeholder trust.
Drives efficiency, continuous improvement, market differentiation.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, documentation/training, internal audits, certification by accredited bodies. Applies globally to manufacturing sites; involves site upgrades, CAPA, ongoing surveillance.

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF Version 1.0) is a mandatory regulatory framework issued by the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority in May 2017. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented blueprint for cybersecurity in SAMA-regulated financial institutions, focusing on governance, risk management, operations, and third-party controls to detect, resist, respond, and recover from cyber threats.

Key Components

Four main domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (over 100 subcontrols).
Six-level Cyber Security Maturity Model (Level 3 minimum: structured policies, standards, procedures, KPIs).
Aligned with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; self-assessment and SAMA audits for compliance.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for banks, insurers, finance firms in Saudi Arabia to avoid penalties, audits, fines.
Enhances resilience, reduces incident risks, improves efficiency.
Builds trust, enables partnerships, competitive edge in digital finance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, design, deployment, operations, continuous improvement.
Applies to all SAMA entities; scalable by size.
Self-assessments, internal/external audits; no external certification but SAMA review required.

Key Differences

Aspect	BRC	SAMA CSF
Scope	Food safety manufacturing, 9 clauses HACCP/GMP	Cybersecurity across 4 domains, maturity model
Industry	Global food supply chain	Saudi financial institutions only
Nature	Voluntary GFSI certification	Mandatory regulatory framework
Testing	Annual third-party site audits	Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits
Penalties	Certification loss, market exclusion	Fines, license suspension

Scope

BRC

Food safety manufacturing, 9 clauses HACCP/GMP

SAMA CSF

Cybersecurity across 4 domains, maturity model

Industry

BRC

Global food supply chain

SAMA CSF

Saudi financial institutions only

Nature

BRC

Voluntary GFSI certification

SAMA CSF

Mandatory regulatory framework

Testing

BRC

Annual third-party site audits

SAMA CSF

Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits

Penalties

BRC

Certification loss, market exclusion

SAMA CSF

Fines, license suspension

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about BRC and SAMA CSF

BRC FAQ

SAMA CSF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PMBOK vs Basel III

Discover PMBOK vs Basel III: Compare project governance standards with banking regulations for superior compliance, risk management, and tailored implementation in finance. (152 characters)

ISO 27001 vs Basel III

ISO 27001 vs Basel III: Compare info sec management systems & banking capital rules. Boost compliance, resilience & strategy. Key differences, benefits inside!

REACH vs SOX

Compare REACH vs SOX: EU chemicals regs vs US financial controls. Master differences, compliance strategies & risks for global ops. Boost your edge today!

BRC

SAMA CSF

Quick Verdict

BRC

Key Features

SAMA CSF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

BRC Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

BRC FAQ

What is the primary objective of BRC?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with BRC?

Does BRC require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for BRC be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with BRC?

Can BRC be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing BRC?

SAMA CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAMA CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAMA CSF?

Does SAMA CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAMA CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAMA CSF?

Can SAMA CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAMA CSF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PMBOK vs Basel III

ISO 27001 vs Basel III

REACH vs SOX