What is the primary objective of **BREEAM**?

**BREEAM's primary objective is to provide a science-based sustainability assessment and certification framework for the built environment, measuring performance across the asset lifecycle.** Developed by BRE in 1990, it uses a category-based structure—**Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, and Innovation**—with weighted credits converting compliance into ratings from **Pass (≥30%) to Outstanding (≥85%)**. This enables comparable, third-party verified outcomes for buildings, infrastructure, and communities.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **BREEAM**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with BREEAM, as it is a voluntary certification scheme.** Professionally, it applies to developers, owners, and operators of new construction, refurbishments, in-use assets, communities, and infrastructure seeking market differentiation, ESG credibility, or alignment with planning incentives. National Scheme Operators in **Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden** deliver adapted versions, while others use International schemes.

Does **BREEAM** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, BREEAM requires third-party certification through licensed BREEAM Assessors and BRE Global quality audits.** Assessors compile evidence against scheme manuals and submit for BRE verification, often including site visits. BRE Global, UKAS-accredited to **ISO/IEC 17065**, issues ratings, ensuring impartiality via evidence review, KBCNs, and compliance with technical criteria like ISO/IEC 17025 for emissions testing.

How often should an assessment for **BREEAM** be performed?

**BREEAM New Construction assessments occur once per project at design and post-construction stages, while BREEAM In-Use requires reassessment every 3 years to maintain certification.** Ongoing monitoring via post-occupancy evaluation supports continuous improvement, with Version 7 emphasizing operational energy modeling and periodic KBCN updates for sustained compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **BREEAM**?

**Non-compliance with BREEAM results in denied credits, lower ratings, or failed certification, with no direct legal penalties as it is voluntary.** Indirect impacts include lost market premiums (e.g., up to 25% rental uplift), planning delays, investor scrutiny, and ESG reporting gaps, particularly for EU Taxonomy alignment in Version 7.

An **BREEAM** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**BREEAM is not designed for direct mapping to other frameworks and must stand alone per its scheme manuals.** Version 7 enhances alignment with policy like EU Taxonomy via whole-life carbon and resilience criteria, but executives require scheme-specific technical manuals for any comparative analysis, avoiding cross-standard assumptions.

What is the first step to begin implementing **BREEAM**?

**The first step is to select the appropriate scheme (e.g., New Construction, In-Use) and version, then appoint a licensed BREEAM Assessor early at project inception.** This enables pre-assessment, credit targeting, and integration into design, per BRE guidance, minimizing risks from RIBA-stage dependencies and KBCN updates.

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to define quality management system requirements for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations to ensure consistent conformity to customer and regulatory requirements while enhancing safety and continual improvement.** It builds on ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure (Clauses 4-10), embedding aerospace-specific controls for configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, and risk-based thinking (Clauses 6.1, 8.1.1) to support continuing airworthiness in safety-critical environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to MRO organizations providing maintenance services for commercial, private, and military aircraft, including repair stations, component overhaul facilities, and OEM MRO divisions.** Compliance is professionally required by customers, OEMs, and regulators (e.g., FAA/EASA Part-145 alignments) for contract eligibility, OASIS listing, and supply-chain approval; it is not legally mandatory but essential where specified in aviation regulations or procurement.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited registrars via a two-stage audit process after internal audits and management review demonstrate operational QMS effectiveness.** Stage 1 reviews documentation and readiness; Stage 2 verifies implementation, with ongoing surveillance audits annually and recertification every three years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, with full cycles completed before certification and at least annually thereafter.** Management reviews occur regularly (e.g., tied to business cycles), requiring 3+ months of operational data; high-risk processes like maintenance planning and configuration control demand higher frequency.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks regulatory sanctions (e.g., loss of Part-145 approvals), contract termination, market exclusion from OEMs/OASIS, and liability from safety incidents.** It leads to failed audits, rework costs, reputational damage, and operational disruptions like AOG events or fines up to $100k/day for airworthiness failures.

An **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C directly maps to ISO 9001:2015 via its shared Annex SL high-level structure and terminology (e.g., documented information, external providers).** IAQG correlation matrices align Clauses 4-10, enabling integrated QMS with regulatory frameworks like EASA/FAA Part-145 without clause exclusions where applicable.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step for AS9110C implementation is a disciplined gap analysis mapping existing processes to all clauses using IAQG checklists, prioritizing high-risk areas like Clause 8 operational controls.** Secure executive sponsorship, define QMS scope with regulatory mapping, and produce a phased SOW with risk-weighted remediation roadmap.

BREEAM vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

BREEAM

Voluntary

1990

World-leading sustainability certification for built environment

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft maintenance organizations.

Quick Verdict

BREEAM certifies sustainable buildings for real estate worldwide, while AS9110C ensures quality management in aviation MRO. Companies adopt BREEAM for ESG value and market premiums; AS9110C for regulatory compliance, safety, and contract eligibility.

Building Sustainability

BREEAM

Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

Cost

€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Third-party audited certification by BRE Global
Category-weighted credit scoring to ratings
Lifecycle schemes for new, in-use, infrastructure
Global adaptation with national scheme operators
Continuous KBCN updates and evidence rigor

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C Quality Management Systems for Aircraft Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking in planning and operations
Configuration management and traceability controls
Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
Maintenance release and human factors requirements
Project management for MRO service delivery

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

BREEAM Details

What It Is

BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it assesses environmental, health, and resilience performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology producing ratings from Pass to Outstanding.

Key Components

**10 core categoriesManagement, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
Credits earned via evidenced compliance; categories weighted by impact (e.g., high for Energy).
Built on technical manuals, KBCNs, and third-party assurance by licensed assessors and BRE audits.
Schemes cover full lifecycle: New Construction, In-Use, Infrastructure.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives ESG alignment, net-zero readiness, asset value uplift (up to 30%), energy savings (22-33%), and regulatory compliance (e.g., EU Taxonomy). Mitigates risks, enhances tenant appeal, and builds investor trust via credible certification.

Implementation Overview

Early assessor/AP appointment, phased evidence gathering tied to design stages, BRE QA certification. Suits all sizes/industries globally; requires training, governance, and monitoring for ongoing In-Use validity.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements for safety-critical processes, using a risk-based thinking (RBT) and PDCA approach.

Key Components

Core clauses (4-10) covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, maintenance release, project management.
Built on Annex SL high-level structure; requires documented evidence of operational QMS cycles.
Certification via accredited registrars with internal audits and management reviews.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part-145).
Mitigates safety risks, ensures airworthiness traceability.
Drives efficiency, on-time delivery, market access via OASIS listing.
Builds stakeholder trust through demonstrable competence and continual improvement.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, pilot, audits, certification (6-12 months typical).
Applies to MROs of all sizes globally; involves training, eQMS, risk registers.
Requires IAQG-aligned auditor training and 3+ months operational data pre-certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	BREEAM	AS9110C
Scope	Sustainability assessment for built environment	Quality management for aviation MRO
Industry	Construction, real estate, infrastructure globally	Aerospace maintenance organizations worldwide
Nature	Voluntary third-party certification scheme	Voluntary QMS certification standard
Testing	Assessor-led audits, BRE quality assurance	Internal audits, registrar certification audits
Penalties	Loss of certification, no legal penalties	Loss of certification, regulatory risks

Scope

BREEAM

Sustainability assessment for built environment

AS9110C

Quality management for aviation MRO

Industry

BREEAM

Construction, real estate, infrastructure globally

AS9110C

Aerospace maintenance organizations worldwide

Nature

BREEAM

Voluntary third-party certification scheme

AS9110C

Voluntary QMS certification standard

Testing

BREEAM

Assessor-led audits, BRE quality assurance

AS9110C

Internal audits, registrar certification audits

Penalties

BREEAM

Loss of certification, no legal penalties

AS9110C

Loss of certification, regulatory risks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about BREEAM and AS9110C

BREEAM FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025

Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs ISO 31000

ISO 27001 vs ISO 31000: Compare security-focused ISMS with general risk principles. Discover differences, implementation tips, and strategic benefits for compliance & resilience. Choose wisely now!

HITRUST CSF vs APRA CPS 234

Discover HITRUST CSF vs APRA CPS 234: Compare certifiable frameworks for compliance. Maturity models, testing, third-party risk—key differences revealed. Boost resilience now.

ISO 22000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Compare ISO 22000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Decode food safety FSMS vs cyber disclosure mandates. Unlock compliance strategies, governance insights. Dive in now!

BREEAM

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

BREEAM

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

BREEAM Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

BREEAM FAQ

What is the primary objective of BREEAM?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with BREEAM?

Does BREEAM require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for BREEAM be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with BREEAM?

An BREEAM be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing BREEAM?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

An AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs ISO 31000

HITRUST CSF vs APRA CPS 234

ISO 22000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules