BREEAM
Global sustainability certification for built environment performance
ISO 22000
International standard for food safety management systems.
Quick Verdict
BREEAM certifies sustainable buildings for construction firms seeking ESG value, while ISO 22000 ensures food safety management for food chain organizations. Companies adopt BREEAM for market premiums and resilience; ISO 22000 for compliance, recalls prevention, and supply chain trust.
BREEAM
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method
Key Features
- Third-party certification by licensed assessors and BRE audits
- Weighted credits across 10 core sustainability categories
- Schemes covering full asset lifecycle and infrastructure
- Continuous updates via Knowledge Base Compliance Notes
- Alignment with net-zero, EU Taxonomy, and resilience
ISO 22000
ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems
Key Features
- Adopts High-Level Structure for management system integration
- Dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
- Integrates HACCP with PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs
- Risk-based hazard analysis and control planning
- Interactive communication across food chain
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
BREEAM Details
What It Is
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for buildings, infrastructure, and communities. Developed by BRE in 1990, it evaluates environmental, health, and resilience performance across asset lifecycles using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology that yields ratings from Pass to Outstanding.
Key Components
- 10 core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
- Credits earned via evidenced compliance, weighted by impact (e.g., high for Energy).
- Schemes like New Construction, In-Use, Infrastructure; supported by technical manuals and KBCNs.
- Third-party model: licensed assessors submit for BRE Global audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives ESG compliance, operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reduction), asset value uplift (up to 30% premiums), and regulatory alignment (EU Taxonomy). Mitigates risks, enhances reputation, and attracts green finance/tenants.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: early assessor appointment, pre-assessment, design integration, evidence collection, certification. Applies globally to all sizes/types; requires training, governance, and post-occupancy monitoring for In-Use validity.
ISO 22000 Details
What It Is
ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through systematic hazard control. Its risk-based approach integrates HACCP principles with management system discipline using the High-Level Structure (HLS).
Key Components
- Core elements: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operation (PRPs, OPRPs, CCPs), performance evaluation, improvement.
- Built on **two PDCA cyclesorganizational and operational.
- Approximately 10 clauses with detailed requirements for hazard analysis, verification, and communication.
- Voluntary certification via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets regulatory/customer requirements; reduces recalls and risks.
- Enhances supply chain trust, market access (e.g., GFSI schemes).
- Drives efficiency, integration with ISO 9001/14001.
- Builds stakeholder confidence and competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard control plan, training, audits.
- Applies to all food chain organizations, scalable by size.
- Involves internal audits, management reviews; certification via stage 1/2 audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | BREEAM | ISO 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Sustainability in built environment (energy, health, ecology) | Food safety management across food chain (hazards, HACCP) |
| Industry | Construction, real estate, infrastructure worldwide | Food production, processing, distribution globally |
| Nature | Voluntary third-party certification scheme | Voluntary international management system standard |
| Testing | Assessor-led audits, BRE quality assurance, periodic recertification | Internal audits, management reviews, certification body audits |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about BREEAM and ISO 22000
BREEAM FAQ
ISO 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU
What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FISMA vs ISO 27018
Compare FISMA vs ISO 27018: US federal risk-based cybersecurity law (NIST RMF) meets global cloud PII privacy code. Master compliance differences, controls & strategies for secure federal data. Dive in now!
ISO 31000 vs ISO 30301
Discover ISO 31000 vs ISO 30301: Risk guidelines meet certifiable records systems. Compare principles, frameworks & implementation to boost governance. Optimize now!
FISMA vs CIS Controls
Uncover FISMA vs CIS Controls: Mandatory federal RMF vs prioritized safeguards. Key differences in compliance, risk mgmt & implementation for agencies/contractors. Boost resilience now!