Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 31000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 31000, as it provides voluntary guidelines rather than mandatory requirements.** It applies universally to any organization—public, private, large or small—where professionals in governance, strategy, and operations seek to integrate risk management for better decision-making and resilience.

Does **ISO 31000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 31000 does not require external audit or third-party certification.** As guidelines, not requirements, it is explicitly “not intended for certification purposes”; organizations demonstrate alignment through internal governance, records, monitoring, and continual improvement per Clauses 4–6.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 31000** be performed?

**ISO 31000 assessments should be performed iteratively and dynamically, not on a fixed schedule.** The monitoring and review process (Clause 6.5) requires continual checks via KPIs/KRIs, with periodic or event-driven reassessments triggered by context changes, incidents, or new information to ensure ongoing suitability and effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 31000**?

**There are no direct legal consequences for non-compliance with ISO 31000, as it is a non-certifiable guideline.** Indirect impacts include heightened operational losses, regulatory scrutiny in aligned regimes, reputational damage, and suboptimal decisions from unmanaged uncertainty on objectives.

Can **ISO 31000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 31000 can be mapped to other international frameworks as its foundational principles, framework, and process support integration.** Clause 6’s risk assessment and treatment steps align with domain-specific standards, enabling consistent risk language across governance systems without prescriptive overlap.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 31000**?

**The first step to implement ISO 31000 is securing leadership commitment and establishing the risk management framework (Clause 5).** Top management must issue a policy, allocate resources, define roles, integrate into governance, and understand organizational context before scaling the process.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 30301**?

**ISO 30301 specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving a Management System for Records (MSR) to support an organization’s mandate, mission, strategy, and goals.** It ensures records provide authoritative, reliable evidence of business activities through governance (Clauses 4–10) and operational controls (Clause 8 and Annex A), emphasizing authenticity, reliability, integrity, and usability.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 30301**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 30301, as it is a voluntary international standard applicable to any organization regardless of size, type, or sector.** Professionally, it is adopted by entities needing demonstrable records governance for regulatory compliance, audits, litigation, or stakeholder trust, such as public agencies, regulated industries, or those sharing business activities across entities.

Does **ISO 30301** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 30301 does not require external audit or third-party certification; it offers three conformity pathways: self-assessment and self-declaration, external confirmation of self-declaration, or third-party certification.** Certification, when pursued, follows ISO/IEC 17065-accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits and surveillance, but self-declaration suffices for internal governance.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 30301** be performed?

**ISO 30301 requires internal audits at planned intervals (Clause 9.2) and management reviews at planned intervals (Clause 9.3) to evaluate MSR performance.** Frequency depends on organizational context, risks, and results, typically annually for audits and reviews, with monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation (Clause 9.1) ongoing via defined KPIs.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 30301**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 30301 carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary, but it exposes organizations to indirect risks like regulatory sanctions, litigation disadvantages, reputational damage, operational disruptions, and loss of stakeholder trust.** Poor records management undermines evidence-based accountability, business continuity, and compliance with legal retention obligations.

Can **ISO 30301** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 30301 aligns with the High-Level Structure (HLS/Annex SL) of other ISO management system standards, enabling mapping and integration of MSR elements.** Informative annexes provide conceptual mappings, supporting combined governance with standards sharing Clauses 4–10, while records-specific controls (Clause 8, Annex A) complement operational requirements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 30301**?

**The first step is understanding the organization’s context, including internal/external issues, records requirements (Clause 4.1.2), and interested parties (Clause 4.2), to define MSR scope (Clause 4.3).** This risk-based analysis anchors leadership commitment (Clause 5), policy development, and subsequent planning.

ISO 31000 vs ISO 30301

Q: What is the primary objective of **ISO 31000**?

**ISO 31000’s primary objective is to provide principles, a framework, and process for managing risk to create and protect value.** It defines risk as the effect of uncertainty on objectives, enabling organizations to systematically identify, analyze, evaluate, treat, monitor, and report risks across any size, type, or sector.

Standards Comparison

ISO 31000

Voluntary

2018

International guidelines for enterprise risk management

ISO 30301

Voluntary

2019

International standard for records management systems requirements

Quick Verdict

ISO 31000 provides voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations, while ISO 30301 sets certifiable requirements for records systems. Companies adopt 31000 for resilient decisions; 30301 for auditable evidence, compliance, and governance assurance.

Risk Management

ISO 31000

ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Eight principles for effective risk management
Non-certifiable guidelines for flexibility
Iterative process with leadership integration
Framework embedding risk into governance
Universal applicability to all organizations

Records Management

ISO 30301

ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records — Requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

High-Level Structure alignment for MSS integration
Top management accountability and records policy
Risk-based planning with measurable objectives
Operational controls for records lifecycle (Clause 8, Annex A)
Flexible conformity pathways including certification

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 31000 Details

What It Is

ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines is a principles-based international standard providing flexible guidance for managing uncertainty. It defines risk as the effect of uncertainty on objectives and applies to any organization, promoting value creation and protection through systematic approaches.

Key Components

**Three pillars8 principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, evaluation), and process (communication, assessment, treatment, monitoring).
No fixed controls; emphasizes iterative PDCA-like cycle.
Non-certifiable, focusing on guidelines over requirements.

Why Organizations Use It

Enhances decision-making, resilience, and governance.
Drives strategic benefits like better resource allocation and opportunity capture.
Builds stakeholder trust without mandatory compliance.
Competitive edge in regulated sectors via best practices.

Implementation Overview

Phased: leadership commitment, gap analysis, pilot process, integration, monitoring.
Customizable for all sizes/industries; involves policy, training, tools like risk registers.
No certification; internal audits ensure alignment.

ISO 30301 Details

What It Is

ISO 30301:2019 is the international requirements standard for Management Systems for Records (MSR). It specifies certifiable requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve records processes, ensuring reliable evidence of business activities supports organizational goals. Using High-Level Structure (HLS) clauses 4–10 with a risk-based PDCA approach, plus records-specific operations in Clause 8 and Annex A.

Key Components

HLS governance: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
**Clause 8 & Annex A (normative)records creation, controls, lifecycle systems
Principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability
Conformity models: self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification

Why Organizations Use It

Meets legal/regulatory records obligations, reduces fines/litigation risks
Enhances efficiency, retrieval, business continuity
Builds stakeholder trust via auditable governance
Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for unified systems
Provides competitive edge in regulated sectors

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy/roles, operational controls, audits
Scalable for any size/sector; 12-18 months typical
Cross-functional, requires training/resources; certification optional

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 31000	ISO 30301
Scope	Enterprise risk management principles, framework, process	Management system for records lifecycle controls
Industry	All organizations, any sector worldwide	All organizations, records-intensive sectors
Nature	Non-certifiable guidelines	Certifiable requirements standard
Testing	Internal monitoring, reviews, no certification	Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits
Penalties	No legal penalties, internal governance risk	Certification loss, compliance failures

Scope

ISO 31000

Enterprise risk management principles, framework, process

ISO 30301

Management system for records lifecycle controls

Industry

ISO 31000

All organizations, any sector worldwide

ISO 30301

All organizations, records-intensive sectors

Nature

ISO 31000

Non-certifiable guidelines

ISO 30301

Certifiable requirements standard

Testing

ISO 31000

Internal monitoring, reviews, no certification

ISO 30301

Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

Penalties

ISO 31000

No legal penalties, internal governance risk

ISO 30301

Certification loss, compliance failures

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 31000 and ISO 30301

ISO 31000 FAQ

ISO 30301 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11

CSL vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Compare China's data localization & governance vs FDA's validation/audit trails. Master dual compliance for global ops—read expert insights now!

ISO 14001 vs ISO 56002

Compare ISO 14001 vs ISO 56002: EMS drives environmental excellence; IMS fuels innovation. Shared PDCA & Annex SL enable seamless integration for compliance & growth. Discover key differences now!

ISO 20000 vs CMMI

Compare ISO 20000 vs CMMI: ISO 20000 certifies IT service lifecycle excellence; CMMI matures processes for dev & ops. Unlock the right framework for peak performance now.

ISO 31000

ISO 30301

Quick Verdict

ISO 31000

Key Features

ISO 30301

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 31000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 30301 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 31000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 31000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 31000?

Does ISO 31000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 31000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 31000?

Can ISO 31000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 31000?

ISO 30301 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 30301?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 30301?

Does ISO 30301 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 30301 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 30301?

Can ISO 30301 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 30301?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11

ISO 14001 vs ISO 56002

ISO 20000 vs CMMI