What is the primary objective of **C-TPAT**?

**C-TPAT's primary objective is to secure U.S. and international supply chains from terrorist intrusion through voluntary public-private partnerships.** Established by CBP in November 2001 post-9/11, it requires partners to implement and document Minimum Security Criteria (MSC) across 12 domains including risk assessment, cybersecurity, and physical access controls. Certified partners—over 11,400 representing >52% of U.S. imports by value—gain lower-risk status, enabling CBP risk-based targeting for fewer exams and faster processing.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **C-TPAT**?

**C-TPAT compliance is voluntary, not legally mandated, but operationally expected for supply chain partners seeking CBP facilitation benefits.** Eligible entities include importers, exporters, highway/rail/sea/air carriers, customs brokers, 3PLs, consolidators, NVOCCs, marine port/terminal operators, and foreign manufacturers. CBP evaluates applications case-by-case, denying those with significant security incidents. Over 11,400 partners participate, often driven by customer requirements or competitive needs.

Does **C-TPAT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**C-TPAT does not require external audits or third-party certification; it relies on CBP-led validations.** Post-application via the C-TPAT Portal and Security Profile approval, partners undergo risk-based validations by Supply Chain Security Specialists (SCSS). These are collaborative, pre-announced (30 days' notice), limited to ≤10 working days, and verify MSC implementation—not regulatory audits. Internal self-validation is mandatory.

How often should an assessment for **C-TPAT** be performed?

**C-TPAT requires annual risk assessments and Security Profile reviews, with more frequent updates for changes.** CBP's importer MSC mandates documented overall risk assessments reviewed yearly or upon risk events (e.g., threats, partner changes). Internal validations ensure ongoing MSC adherence. CBP revalidations occur periodically (typically every 4 years), risk-based.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **C-TPAT**?

**Non-compliance with C-TPAT results in suspended benefits, not fines, as it is voluntary.** Significant validation weaknesses trigger corrective action plans; unremedied issues lead to benefit suspension/removal (e.g., lost reduced exams, FAST access). Reinstatement requires verified remediation. Persistent failures risk program removal, increasing targeting and delays.

An **C-TPAT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, C-TPAT maps to international AEO programs via 19 Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRAs) as of June 2025.** MRAs with countries like EU, Canada, Mexico, Japan, UK, India, and South Africa recognize equivalent security validations, reducing duplication. C-TPAT status serves as a portable "trusted trader" credential, though MRAs cover security only, not full customs compliance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **C-TPAT**?

**The first step is submitting a Company Profile and Security Profile via the secure C-TPAT Portal.** Eligibility requires demonstrating MSC adherence and no significant security incidents. Conduct a pre-application gap analysis against role-specific MSCs, then apply online—CBP reviews within 90 days, assigning an SCSS upon provisional certification.

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to enable aviation maintenance organizations to consistently provide products and services meeting customer and applicable statutory/regulatory requirements while enhancing customer satisfaction through effective QMS application and continual improvement.** It incorporates ISO 9001:2015 baseline requirements via Annex SL high-level structure (Clauses 4–10) and adds maintenance-specific controls in Clause 8, including configuration management, product safety, counterfeit/suspect parts prevention, identification/traceability, preservation, and nonconforming output control. This supports continuing airworthiness for repair stations and MRO providers.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to organizations whose primary business is aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul (MRO), or continuing airworthiness management services.** Target entities include independent repair stations, airline maintenance departments, engine/avionics shops, component overhaul facilities, and OEMs with autonomous MRO operations. It is not legally mandatory but professionally required for OASIS listing, customer contracts with OEMs/airlines, and alignment with competent authority approvals (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145), regardless of organization size or type.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited bodies listed in the IAQG OASIS database.** Organizations must demonstrate QMS operational maturity (minimum 3 months fully operational, including a full internal audit cycle and management review) before Stage 1/2 audits. Certification confirms conformity to Clauses 4–10, with ongoing surveillance audits (typically annual) and recertification every 3 years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, status, and importance.** Critical processes (e.g., Clause 8 operational planning, configuration management) require higher frequency; a full QMS cycle is mandatory before initial certification and annually thereafter. Management reviews occur at regular intervals (e.g., semi-annually), using performance data from monitoring (Clause 9.1).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks loss of certification, exclusion from IAQG OASIS, contract ineligibility with OEMs/airlines, and competent authority sanctions.** It may lead to regulatory violations (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145 suspension), safety incidents from poor traceability/configuration, rework costs, AOG events, and reputational damage. No direct fines are specified, but customer/regulatory requirements override, potentially triggering operational shutdowns.

An **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C aligns directly with ISO 9001:2015 via shared Annex SL structure and terminology (e.g., documented information, external providers).** IAQG provides correlation matrices for regulatory mappings (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145). It supports integrated management systems but requires justification for any non-applicable requirements within QMS scope.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step is to define QMS scope, determine internal/external issues (Clause 4), and conduct a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10.** Secure executive sponsorship, map regulatory/customer requirements, and justify any non-applicable clauses. Produce a prioritized gap register to initiate phased implementation.

C-TPAT vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

C-TPAT

Voluntary

2001

U.S. voluntary supply chain security partnership program

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

International QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations

Quick Verdict

C-TPAT secures supply chains via voluntary CBP partnership for trade benefits, while AS9110C certifies aerospace MRO quality. Companies adopt C-TPAT for faster customs, AS9110C for regulatory compliance and contracts.

Supply Chain Security

C-TPAT

Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Trusted trader model reduces CBP inspections
Tailored Minimum Security Criteria by partner type
Risk-based validation with Supply Chain Specialists
Mutual Recognition Agreements enable global benefits
Annual Security Profile updates ensure continuous improvement

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking in strategic and operational planning
Configuration management and product traceability controls
Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention processes
Human factors integration in root cause analysis
Maintenance release and continuing airworthiness requirements

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

C-TPAT Details

What It Is

Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) is a voluntary public-private partnership administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). It secures international supply chains against terrorism and crime using a trusted trader model with tailored Minimum Security Criteria (MSC) for partners like importers, carriers, and manufacturers.

Key Components

**12 MSC domainsCorporate Security, Risk Assessment, Business Partners, Cybersecurity, Physical Access, Personnel, Conveyance, Seals, Procedural, Agricultural, Training, Audits.
Security Profile documents compliance; risk-based validations by Supply Chain Security Specialists.
Tiered benefits from Tier 1 certification to Tier 3 advanced practices.

Why Organizations Use It

**Trade facilitationReduced inspections, FAST lanes, priority processing.
Enhances resilience, competitiveness, and mutual recognition via MRAs.
Builds stakeholder trust; no legal mandate but market-driven.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, training, internal audits. Applies to trade entities; voluntary certification via portal, validations within 1 year. Suits all sizes with risk-based scaling (~180 words).

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance organizations, such as repair stations and MRO providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aviation-specific requirements for continuing airworthiness, using a risk-based thinking approach across its Annex SL high-level structure.

Key Components

Core clauses (4–10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, product safety.
Based on PDCA cycle; requires documented information, no exclusions without justification.
Certification via IAQG-accredited bodies with audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures regulatory compliance (FAA/EASA) and customer contracts.
Mitigates safety risks, enhances on-time delivery.
Builds trust, enables OASIS listing for market access.
Drives continual improvement and operational resilience.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6–12 months typical).
Applies to MROs globally; involves leadership commitment, risk registers, internal audits.
Certification requires 3+ months operational evidence.

Key Differences

Aspect	C-TPAT	AS9110C
Scope	Supply chain security from terrorism threats	Aerospace MRO quality management system
Industry	International trade, importers, carriers, logistics	Aviation maintenance, repair organizations
Nature	Voluntary CBP partnership, trusted trader model	Certification standard based on ISO 9001
Testing	Risk-based CBP validations every 4 years	Internal audits, third-party certification audits
Penalties	Benefit suspension, no legal fines	Loss of certification, contract ineligibility

Scope

C-TPAT

Supply chain security from terrorism threats

AS9110C

Aerospace MRO quality management system

Industry

C-TPAT

International trade, importers, carriers, logistics

AS9110C

Aviation maintenance, repair organizations

Nature

C-TPAT

Voluntary CBP partnership, trusted trader model

AS9110C

Certification standard based on ISO 9001

Testing

C-TPAT

Risk-based CBP validations every 4 years

AS9110C

Internal audits, third-party certification audits

Penalties

C-TPAT

Benefit suspension, no legal fines

AS9110C

Loss of certification, contract ineligibility

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about C-TPAT and AS9110C

C-TPAT FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

TISAX vs ISO 17025

Explore TISAX vs ISO 17025: Automotive infosec vs lab competence standards. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for supply chain success. Choose wisely now!

SOC 2 vs CAA

Discover SOC 2 vs CAA: Compare security controls for SaaS with Clean Air Act emissions regs. Key differences, compliance tips & strategies for enterprise success.

OSHA vs AEO

Discover OSHA vs AEO: Compare US workplace safety regs with global trade security certification. Master compliance, cut risks, boost efficiency. Vital guide for execs.

C-TPAT

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

C-TPAT

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

C-TPAT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

C-TPAT FAQ

What is the primary objective of C-TPAT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with C-TPAT?

Does C-TPAT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for C-TPAT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with C-TPAT?

An C-TPAT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing C-TPAT?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

An AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

TISAX vs ISO 17025

SOC 2 vs CAA

OSHA vs AEO