MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs AS9110C
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
China's mandatory graded network protection regulation
AS9110C
Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft maintenance organizations
Quick Verdict
MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China networks via PSB enforcement, while AS9110C certifies voluntary QMS for global aviation MRO. Chinese firms adopt MLPS for legal compliance; aerospace providers seek AS9110C for contracts and safety.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)
Key Features
- Five impact-based protection levels (1-5)
- Mandatory PSB registration and approval Level 2+
- Third-party audits requiring 75/100 score minimum
- Extended controls for cloud IoT ICS big data
- Law enforcement oversight with on-site inspections
AS9110C
AS9110C Quality Management System Requirements for Aircraft Maintenance Organizations
Key Features
- Risk-based thinking in planning and operations
- Configuration management and part traceability
- Counterfeit parts prevention controls
- Human factors and competence verification
- Maintenance release and airworthiness assurance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details
What It Is
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's mandatory cybersecurity regulation under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It classifies information systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, using an impact-based risk methodology.
Key Components
- Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
- Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (baseline), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
- Common controls plus level-specific and technology extensions (cloud, IoT, ICS).
- Compliance via self-classification, third-party audits (75/100 score), PSB approval.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate for all China network operators to avoid fines, suspensions.
- Enhances resilience, supports market access, license renewals.
- Builds regulator trust, integrates with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
Implementation Overview
- Phased: classify, gap analysis, remediate, audit, ongoing re-evaluations.
- Applies to all sizes in China; Level 3+ needs annual audits.
- High costs, multi-year commitment for foreign/domestic firms.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific controls using a risk-based, process-oriented approach via High Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Core areas: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, maintenance release.
- Built on risk-based thinking (RBT), organizational knowledge.
- Third-party certification model with internal audits and management reviews.
Why Organizations Use It
- Contractual mandates from OEMs/airlines; regulatory alignment (FAA/EASA Part-145).
- Mitigates safety risks, ensures airworthiness.
- Drives efficiency, on-time delivery, customer satisfaction.
- Enables market access, supply-chain integration, competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process mapping, training, pilots, audits.
- Targets global MROs; 6-12 months typical.
- Requires operational evidence pre-certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Graded cybersecurity for networks/systems | Quality management for aviation MRO |
| Industry | All sectors in mainland China | Aerospace maintenance globally |
| Nature | Mandatory regulation by PSBs | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Third-party audits, PSB approval | Internal audits, certification body |
| Penalties | Fines, suspensions, inspections | Loss of certification, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and AS9110C
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)
Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic
NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs
Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i
Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and AS9110C compare against other standards