CAA
U.S. federal law protecting air quality via standards
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity compliance
Quick Verdict
CAA governs US air emissions nationwide via NAAQS and permits for all industries, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity programs for NY financial entities with CISO oversight and 72-hour reporting. Organizations adopt CAA for environmental compliance, 500 for regulatory cyber resilience.
CAA
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.)
Key Features
- Sets NAAQS for six criteria pollutants protecting health
- Mandates SIPs for attainment and nonattainment planning
- Requires Title V operating permits for major sources
- Imposes NSPS and MACT technology-based standards
- Enforces via penalties, sanctions, and citizen suits
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500
Key Features
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification to NYDFS
- Annual CEO/CISO dual-signature compliance certification
- Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged and remote access
- Risk-based third-party service provider oversight
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CAA Details
What It Is
Clean Air Act (CAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq., is a comprehensive U.S. federal statute regulating air emissions. It establishes national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and technology-based emission limits through a cooperative federalism model where EPA sets floors and states implement via SIPs.
Key Components
- NAAQS for six criteria pollutants (ozone, PM, CO, Pb, SO2, NO2) with primary/secondary standards.
- SIPs, Title V permits, NSPS, NESHAPs/MACT.
- Title II mobile sources, Title IV acid rain trading, Title VI ozone protection.
- No formal certification; compliance via permits, monitoring, reporting, enforced federally/state.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for major sources, mobile manufacturers; reduces health risks, avoids penalties/sanctions. Enhances ESG, operational efficiency via controls, market mechanisms like trading.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, permitting (Title V/NSR/PSD), controls (CEMS/testing), reporting (CEDRI). Applies to industries (energy, manufacturing); varies by source size/location. Audits via EPA protocols, renewals every 5 years.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) cybersecurity regulation. It is a mandatory regulation for financial services entities, establishing minimum risk-based cybersecurity standards to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems. Its primary scope covers NY-licensed banks, insurers, and related firms, using a risk-assessment-centric approach.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO appointment, MFA, encryption, TPSP oversight, penetration testing, and incident response.
- Built on NIST CSF or equivalent frameworks.
- Dual-signature annual certification by CEO/CISO, with five-year record retention; enhanced for Class A companies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal compliance for NY operations avoids multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, builds stakeholder trust.
- Provides competitive edge in vendor selection and insurance premiums.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment (MFA, asset inventory), testing.
- Applies to all sizes of covered entities in NY financial sector.
- No external certification but NYDFS examinations and evidence retention required. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | CAA | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Air emissions, NAAQS, stationary/mobile sources | Cybersecurity for information systems, NPI |
| Industry | All industries nationwide (US) | NY financial services entities only |
| Nature | Federal environmental law, mandatory | State cybersecurity regulation, mandatory |
| Testing | CEMS, stack tests, Title V monitoring | Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans |
| Penalties | Civil fines, sanctions, FIPs | Monetary penalties, consent orders |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CAA and 23 NYCRR 500
CAA FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)
Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool
Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
COBIT vs AS9120B
Discover COBIT vs AS9120B: IT governance framework meets aerospace QMS. Tailor compliance, align strategy, manage risks effectively. Choose wisely—read now!
GRI vs ISO 27017
GRI vs ISO 27017: Compare GRI's impact-driven sustainability standards (e.g., GRI 403 OHS) with ISO 27017's cloud security controls. Key diffs, benefits & compliance guide. Explore now!
PCI DSS vs MAS TRM
Discover PCI DSS vs MAS TRM: Compare payment card security standards with Singapore's tech risk guidelines. Key differences, overlaps & strategies for financial compliance. Secure your ops now!