COBIT
Framework for enterprise IT governance and management
AS9120B
Aerospace standard for distributors' quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
COBIT provides flexible I&T governance frameworks for enterprises worldwide, while AS9120B mandates certified QMS for aerospace distributors. Companies adopt COBIT for value-driven IT alignment; AS9120B for supply chain access and safety compliance.
COBIT
COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Framework
Key Features
- Tailored governance using 11 design factors
- 40 objectives across 5 domains EDM-APO-BAI-DSS-MEA
- CMMI-based performance management levels 0-5
- Explicit separation governance from management
- Goals cascade links stakeholders to metrics
AS9120B
AS9120B Quality Management Systems - Requirements
Key Features
- Prevents counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts
- Ensures traceability and chain-of-custody controls
- Strengthens external provider evaluation and flowdown
- Mandates configuration management for distribution
- Requires product safety and ethical awareness
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COBIT Details
What It Is
COBIT 2019 is ISACA's comprehensive framework for enterprise governance and management of information and technology (EGIT). It helps organizations create value from IT, manage risk, and optimize resources through a tailored governance system. Primary scope covers enterprise-wide I&T, using a design workflow with 11 design factors for customization and a goals cascade linking stakeholder needs to objectives.
Key Components
- 40 governance and management objectives grouped into 5 domains: EDM (governance), APO (align/plan), BAI (build/implement), DSS (deliver/support), MEA (monitor/assess).
- 6 governance system principles and 7 components (processes, structures, policies, culture, information, services, people).
- CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5). No formal certification; compliance via self-assessment and audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives strategic alignment, risk optimization, and compliance (e.g., SOX, GDPR mappings). Enhances auditability, digital transformation, and stakeholder trust via measurable outcomes and interoperability with ISO 27001, ITIL, NIST.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: assess maturity, design via toolkit, pilot objectives, train (Foundation/Design certs), monitor with MEA. Suited for large/regulated enterprises; scalable for mid-size via tailoring. Involves gap analysis, RACI, KPIs; ongoing via feedback loops.
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aviation, space, and defense distributors, built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure. It establishes requirements for organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without altering characteristics, using a risk-based approach to address supply chain risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.
Key Components
- Over 100 aerospace-specific requirements beyond ISO 9001.
- Core areas: context analysis, leadership, risk planning, support resources, operational controls (traceability, counterfeit prevention, external providers), performance evaluation, and improvement.
- Emphasizes chain-of-custody, configuration management, and product safety.
- Certification via accredited bodies, listed in IAQG OASIS.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access to OEMs and primes.
- Mitigates risks of nonconformities, recalls, and liabilities.
- Builds customer trust through auditable processes.
- Drives efficiency in inventory and supplier management.
Implementation Overview
- Phased rollout: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
- Applies to global distributors; scales by size.
- Requires internal audits, management reviews, and third-party certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | COBIT | AS9120B |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise I&T governance and management across 40 objectives | Aerospace distributor QMS with traceability and counterfeit controls |
| Industry | All industries worldwide, enterprise IT governance | Aerospace distribution sector, aviation/space/defense supply chains |
| Nature | Voluntary governance framework, no certification | Certification standard based on ISO 9001:2015 |
| Testing | Capability assessments levels 0-5, internal performance management | Third-party certification audits, surveillance and recertification |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of governance maturity | Loss of certification, market exclusion from OEM contracts |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COBIT and AS9120B
COBIT FAQ
AS9120B FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU
What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AEO vs ISO 56002
AEO vs ISO 56002: Compare customs security certification with innovation management guidance. Unlock requirements, benefits & strategies for trade facilitation & growth. Dive in!
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs MAS TRM
Compare ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs MAS TRM: AI governance meets Singapore's tech risk framework. Gain insights for ethical AI, compliance & resilience in finance. Dive in now!
HITRUST CSF vs ISO 30301
Discover HITRUST CSF vs ISO 30301: Compare threat-adaptive security harmonizing 60+ standards with records governance for compliance. Choose the right framework for cybersecurity & records mastery now!