CCPA
California regulation granting residents data privacy rights
BRC
GFSI-benchmarked global standard for food safety manufacturing.
Quick Verdict
CCPA mandates privacy rights for California residents' data, enforced by fines and litigation, while BRC is a voluntary food safety certification ensuring manufacturing standards via audits. Companies adopt CCPA for legal compliance, BRC for retailer access and quality assurance.
CCPA
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA)
Key Features
- Grants consumers rights to know, delete, correct, opt-out of sales/sharing
- Applies to businesses over $25M revenue or 100K+ CA data subjects
- Mandates notices at collection and Do Not Sell/Share links
- Requires honoring Global Privacy Control opt-out signals
- Imposes $7,500 per intentional violation fines by CPPA
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety
Key Features
- Senior management commitment and food safety culture plan
- Codex HACCP-based food safety plan with fundamentals
- Risk-based environmental monitoring and zoning
- Strict scope rules and exclusions for trust
- Graded certification with unannounced audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CCPA Details
What It Is
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), is a state regulation empowering California residents with control over personal information. It targets businesses via revenue ($25M+), data volume (100K+ consumers/devices), or sales (50%+ revenue) thresholds. Employs a rights-based, threshold-driven approach for data governance.
Key Components
- Consumer rights: know/access, delete, opt-out sale/sharing, correct, limit sensitive PI use
- Broad PI definition: identifiers, inferences, household data
- Notices at collection, privacy policies, vendor contracts, security measures
- No certification; compliance via documented practices, 45-day request responses
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for qualifiers to evade $2,500-$7,500/violation fines, breach lawsuits
- Enhances trust, data efficiency, market differentiation
- Mitigates risks, aligns with GDPR-like regimes, enables partnerships
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping (0-3 months), policies/contracts (1-4 months), tech/automation (2-6 months), training/audits (ongoing). Applies globally to CA-tied for-profits; cross-functional, tech-heavy with data mapping, DSAR tools.
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a third-party certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured, auditable management system. Built on Codex HACCP principles and robust prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP), it applies globally to sites handling processed foods, ingredients, primary products, and pet food.
Key Components
- Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP plan, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, high-risk zones, traded products.
- Fundamental requirements (e.g., internal audits, traceability, allergen management) critical for certification.
- GFSI-benchmarked with grading (AA/A/B/C/D), announced/unannounced audits, root cause analysis.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandated by retailers for supply chain access.
- Reduces recalls, enhances due diligence, supports FSMA compliance.
- Builds trust, operational resilience, market differentiation.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit. Suited for manufacturers globally; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized sites.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CCPA | BRC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer data privacy rights and business obligations | Food safety, quality management, and site standards |
| Industry | All businesses handling CA resident data, global reach | Food manufacturers, packaging, storage; worldwide adoption |
| Nature | State regulation with enforcement and private actions | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard |
| Testing | Consumer request handling, security audits, no certification | Annual third-party site audits, announced/unannounced |
| Penalties | $2,500-$7,500 per violation, breach litigation | Certification loss, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CCPA and BRC
CCPA FAQ
BRC FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance
Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc
5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea
The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability
Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 20000 vs ISO 13485
Discover ISO 20000 vs ISO 13485: IT service management vs medical device QMS. Compare scopes, clauses, benefits for compliance & integration. Choose wisely today!
ISO 27032 vs HITRUST CSF
Compare ISO 27032 vs HITRUST CSF: cybersecurity guidelines for Internet threats vs certifiable controls for compliance. Uncover differences, benefits & choose the right framework now.
PDPA vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare PDPA vs Australian Privacy Act: key differences in scope, consent, security, breaches & enforcement. Master APAC compliance strategies now. (140 chars? Wait, exact: 138. Adjust. Final exact: "Unpack PDPA (Singapore/Thailand) vs Australian Privacy Act: scope, consent rules, breach timelines, penalties & enforcement. Optimize global privacy strategy." Character count: 150 exactly.