CCPA
California regulation for consumer data privacy rights
EPA
U.S. federal regulations for environmental protection standards
Quick Verdict
CCPA grants California consumers data rights like know, delete, opt-out, mandating notices and request handling for qualifying businesses. EPA enforces environmental standards via permits, monitoring for clean air, water, waste. Companies adopt CCPA for compliance, trust; EPA to avoid fines, ensure operations.
CCPA
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA)
Key Features
- Grants consumers rights to know, delete, opt-out, correct data
- Applies to businesses exceeding $25M revenue or 100K CA data
- Mandates notices at collection and comprehensive privacy policies
- Requires honoring Global Privacy Control opt-out signals
- Enforces fines up to $7,500 per intentional violation
EPA
U.S. EPA Environmental Standards (40 CFR)
Key Features
- Multi-layered architecture: statutes, 40 CFR, permits
- Technology-based and health-based performance standards
- Evidence-driven monitoring, reporting, QA/QC requirements
- Federal-state permitting and implementation variability
- Strict enforcement with civil penalties and SEPs
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CCPA Details
What It Is
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as amended by CPRA, is a state regulation establishing consumer privacy rights for California residents. It targets for-profit businesses meeting thresholds like $25M revenue or handling 100K+ consumers' data. Primary purpose: empower consumers with control over personal information (PI) via rights-based approach, including broad PI definitions covering inferences and devices.
Key Components
- Core rights: know/access, delete, opt-out sales/sharing, correct, limit sensitive PI
- Obligations: notices at collection, privacy policies, vendor contracts, data mapping
- Enforcement by CPPA with $2,500-$7,500 fines per violation; private breach actions
- No certification; compliance via audits, risk assessments
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for applicable businesses to avoid fines, litigation, reputational harm. Provides data governance, efficiency gains, trust-building, GDPR alignment, market differentiation.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/gap analysis (0-3 months), policies/contracts (1-4 months), technical controls (2-6 months), operationalization/training, ongoing audits. Applies globally to CA data handlers; cross-functional effort with automation tools.
EPA Details
What It Is
EPA standards are a family of legally binding U.S. federal regulations implementing major environmental statutes like the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Codified primarily in Title 40 of the CFR, they establish performance requirements for emissions, discharges, and waste management using a risk-based and technology-based approach to protect public health and ecosystems.
Key Components
- Ambient standards (NAAQS), technology-based limits (MACT, effluent guidelines), and work practices.
- Permitting (NPDES, Title V), monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting.
- Enforcement pathways with civil penalties and settlements. Built on statutory authority, with federal-state implementation; compliance via evidence-driven systems, no formal certification but audits and inspections.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, shutdowns, and liabilities. Drives risk management, operational efficiency, ESG alignment, and access to grants/markets.
Implementation Overview
Phased gap analysis, regulatory mapping, controls deployment, training, and digital reporting. Applies to industrial facilities across sectors; involves audits, permits, and ongoing monitoring. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | CCPA | EPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer personal information rights and obligations | Environmental protection across air, water, waste |
| Industry | Businesses meeting CA revenue/data thresholds, global reach | Energy, manufacturing, chemicals, agriculture, nationwide |
| Nature | Mandatory state privacy regulation with fines | Mandatory federal environmental statutes enforced via permits |
| Testing | Data inventories, request handling, security audits | Monitoring, sampling, emissions testing, compliance inspections |
| Penalties | $2,500-$7,500 per violation, private breach actions | Civil penalties, injunctive relief, criminal for knowing violations |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CCPA and EPA
CCPA FAQ
EPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs NIST 800-171
Compare NIST CSF vs NIST 800-171: Voluntary framework meets CUI controls. Uncover differences, mappings, & strategies for compliance. Strengthen your cyber posture now!
IEC 62443 vs BRC
Compare IEC 62443 vs BRC: Cybersecurity for IACS (OT resilience) meets food safety standards. Uncover differences, compliance strategies, and implementation roadmap to secure operations now.
LGPD vs ISO 31000
Compare LGPD vs ISO 31000: Master Brazil's data law with risk management principles. Explore similarities, gaps, enforcement strategies & compliance roadmap for resilient ops. Dive in now!