LGPD
Brazil's comprehensive regulation for personal data protection
ISO 31000
International guidelines for risk management principles.
Quick Verdict
LGPD mandates data protection for Brazilian residents with fines up to 2% revenue, while ISO 31000 offers voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations. Companies adopt LGPD for legal compliance, ISO 31000 for strategic resilience.
LGPD
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law No. 13.709/2018)
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope targets Brazilian residents worldwide
- 10 core principles expand beyond GDPR's seven
- Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue capped R$50M
- Mandatory DPO for controllers with public disclosure
- SCCs mandatory for cross-border transfers by 2025
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- 8 core principles for integrated risk management
- Framework emphasizing leadership commitment
- Iterative process for risk assessment and treatment
- Customizable to any organization size or sector
- Focus on continual improvement and culture
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
LGPD Details
What It Is
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD), Law No. 13.709/2018, is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation. Enacted in 2018 and fully enforced since 2021, it safeguards personal data of Brazilian residents with extraterritorial scope. Primary purpose: protect privacy rights via risk-based processing rules, mirroring GDPR but with Brazilian adaptations like 10 principles.
Key Components
- **10 core principlespurpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability.
- **Data subject rightsaccess, correction, deletion, portability, anonymization, objection to automated decisions.
- **Legal bases10 options including consent, contracts, legitimate interests.
- **Governancemandatory DPO for controllers, DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD enforcement with graduated sanctions up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap).
Why Organizations Use It
Legal obligation for entities processing Brazilian data; avoids multimillion fines, operational halts. Builds trust, enables market access in Brazil's digital economy, reduces breach risks, supports AI innovation via anonymization exemptions.
Implementation Overview
Phased risk-based approach: governance setup, data mapping/RoPA, policies, technical controls, DSR/incident processes, vendor management, audits. Applies to all sizes/industries globally targeting Brazil; no certification but ANPD audits.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international, non-certifiable standard providing a principles-based framework for managing risk systematically. Its primary purpose is to help organizations identify, analyze, evaluate, treat, monitor, and review risks to create and protect value. The approach emphasizes integration into governance and operations, with a cyclical process.
Key Components
- **Three pillars8 core principles (e.g., integrated, customized, continual improvement), framework (leadership, design, implementation, evaluation), and process (communication, assessment, treatment, monitoring).
- No fixed controls; flexible, tailored application.
- Built on PDCA cycle; voluntary compliance model without certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives strategic resilience, better decisions, and opportunity capture.
- Meets regulatory benchmarks, reduces losses, builds stakeholder trust.
- Enhances efficiency, capital allocation, and competitive edge across sectors.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, design, pilot, integrate, optimize.
- Involves policy, training, tools, governance for any size/industry.
- No mandatory audits; internal reviews ensure effectiveness. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | LGPD | ISO 31000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection and processing | General enterprise risk management |
| Industry | All sectors targeting Brazilian residents | All industries worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory data protection law | Voluntary risk management guidelines |
| Testing | DPIAs for high-risk processing | Risk assessments and monitoring |
| Penalties | Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue | No legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about LGPD and ISO 31000
LGPD FAQ
ISO 31000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU
What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t
Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AS9110C vs NERC CIP
Compare AS9110C vs NERC CIP: Aerospace MRO QMS meets grid cybersecurity standards. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & implementation tips for peak reliability. Dive in now!
GDPR vs Six Sigma
Explore GDPR vs Six Sigma: Contrast EU data privacy regulation with process excellence methodology. Principles, challenges, enforcement & global impact for compliance mastery. Dive in!
PDPA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Compare PDPA (Singapore/Thailand privacy laws) vs MLPS 2.0 (China's cybersecurity scheme). Key differences, compliance strategies & insights for Asia-Pacific data protection.