CCPA
California regulation granting residents rights over personal data
ISO 27701
International standard for privacy information management systems.
Quick Verdict
CCPA mandates California consumer rights like know, delete, opt-out for qualifying businesses, enforced by fines. ISO 27701 provides voluntary global PIMS certification for privacy governance. Companies adopt CCPA for legal compliance, ISO 27701 for auditable assurance and trust.
CCPA
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA)
Key Features
- Grants residents rights to know, delete, correct personal data
- Requires opt-out of sales/sharing via GPC signals
- Applies to businesses over $25M revenue or 100K CA consumers
- Mandates notices at collection and comprehensive privacy policies
- Enforces fines up to $7,500 per violation plus breach actions
ISO 27701
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy Information Management
Key Features
- Establishes Privacy Information Management System (PIMS)
- Controller/processor-specific privacy controls in annexes
- Extends ISO 27001 with GDPR-aligned mappings
- Risk-based PDCA cycle for continual improvement
- 3-year certification with annual surveillance audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CCPA Details
What It Is
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as amended by California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), is a state regulation providing California residents rights over personal information. It targets for-profit businesses meeting thresholds like $25M revenue or handling 100K+ consumers' data. Primary purpose: empower consumers with control via opt-out model; risk-based with data minimization and security focus.
Key Components
- Consumer rights: know/access, delete, correct, opt-out sales/sharing, limit sensitive data
- Obligations: notices at collection, privacy policies, vendor contracts, DSAR handling within 45 days
- Enforcement by CPPA and Attorney General; no certification, but audits and compliance demonstration required
- Built on broad personal information definition including inferences, households
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for qualifying businesses to avoid $7,500/violation fines, breach litigation ($100-$750/consumer). Reduces risks, builds trust, enables market access; strategic for data governance efficiency, GDPR alignment.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/gap analysis (0-3 months), policies/contracts (1-4 months), technical controls (2-6 months), operationalization/audits (ongoing). Applies globally to CA data handlers; cross-functional, tech-heavy for enterprises.
ISO 27701 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is an international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It extends the ISO 27001 information security framework with privacy-specific requirements, using a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) management system approach for organizations acting as PII controllers or processors.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Annex A (controllers) and Annex B (processors) provide ~50 privacy controls on consent, DSARs, retention, transfers.
- Built on ISO 27001/27002; includes GDPR mappings (Annex D).
- Certification via accredited bodies, 3-year cycle with surveillance audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates accountability for global privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA).
- Reduces risks from breaches, fines; enhances supply-chain trust.
- Provides audit-ready evidence for regulators, procurement.
- Builds competitive edge through certified privacy governance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scope, gap analysis, controls, audits (6-12 months typical).
- Applies to all sizes/sectors handling PII; integrates with ISMS.
- Requires RoPA, DSAR processes, training, vendor contracts.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CCPA | ISO 27701 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | California consumer rights, data sales/sharing | Global PIMS for PII controllers/processors |
| Industry | Businesses meeting CA thresholds, global reach | All PII-handling organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory state regulation with fines | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | No formal certification, internal compliance checks | Third-party audits, 3-year certification cycle |
| Penalties | $2,500-$7,500 per violation, private actions | Loss of certification, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CCPA and ISO 27701
CCPA FAQ
ISO 27701 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks
Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi
You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization
Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star
Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance
Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AS9110C vs ISO 30301
Discover AS9110C vs ISO 30301: Aerospace QMS for aviation maintenance meets records management mastery. Compare HLS structures, risks, ops controls & certification paths. Boost compliance now!
EN 1090 vs ISO 41001
Compare EN 1090 vs ISO 41001: EN 1090 ensures CE marking for steel/aluminium via FPC & EXC. ISO 41001 powers FM systems for sustainable ops. Master compliance & strategy!
OSHA vs ISO 37301
Compare OSHA vs ISO 37301: US enforcement meets global CMS standards. Discover risks, hierarchies, and integration for peak compliance. Boost safety now!