CCPA
California regulation granting residents data privacy rights
K-PIPA
South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection
Quick Verdict
CCPA grants California residents rights to know, delete, and opt-out of data sales for businesses meeting thresholds, while K-PIPA mandates consent-centric protections for all Korean data handlers with strict CPO oversight. Companies adopt CCPA for CA compliance, K-PIPA for Korean market access.
CCPA
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA)
Key Features
- Grants consumers rights to know, delete, opt-out of sales/sharing
- Applies to businesses with $25M revenue or 100K+ CA consumers/devices
- Mandates 'Do Not Sell/Share' links and Global Privacy Control honoring
- Requires notices at collection and comprehensive privacy policies
- Imposes $2,500-$7,500 fines per violation plus breach private actions
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Key Features
- Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer appointment
- Granular explicit consent for sensitive data
- 72-hour breach notifications to subjects
- 10-day data subject rights response
- Extraterritorial application to foreign entities
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CCPA Details
What It Is
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), is a state regulation establishing consumer privacy rights for California residents. It targets for-profit businesses meeting thresholds like $25M revenue or handling data of 100K+ consumers. Primary purpose: empower consumers with control over personal information via rights-based approach including opt-out and data minimization.
Key Components
- Core consumer rights: know/access, delete, opt-out sales/sharing, correct, limit sensitive PI use
- Obligations: notices at collection, privacy policies, vendor contracts, GPC honoring
- Enforcement by CPPA and AG with $2,500-$7,500 per violation fines
- No formal certification; compliance demonstrated via audits and documentation
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for qualifying businesses to avoid fines, litigation, reputational harm
- Builds trust, enables market differentiation, reduces breach risks
- Improves data governance, efficiency; aligns with GDPR-like regimes
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/gap analysis (0-3 months), policies/contracts (1-4 months), technical controls (2-6 months), operationalization/audits (ongoing). Applies globally to CA data handlers; cross-functional teams, automation tools essential.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It safeguards personal information of Korean residents, including sensitive data like health and biometrics, via a consent-centric, risk-based approach applicable to domestic and foreign entities targeting Koreans.
Key Components
- Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accountability.
- Obligations: mandatory Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs), granular consent, security measures (encryption, access controls), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability within 10 days).
- Breach notifications (72 hours), cross-border transfer rules, enforced by PIPC with fines up to 3% of revenue.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal compliance avoids hefty fines (e.g., Google's $50M penalty).
- Enhances trust, enables EU adequacy data flows.
- Mitigates risks in breaches, supports AI/innovation via pseudonymization.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, CPO appointment, policy development, technical controls, training, audits. Applies broadly to businesses handling Korean data; no certification but PIPC oversight and ISMS-P for transfers. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | CCPA | K-PIPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer rights over personal info for CA residents | Personal data processing by all handlers in Korea |
| Industry | All for-profit businesses meeting CA thresholds | All sectors, public/private, domestic/foreign targeting Korea |
| Nature | Mandatory state regulation with CPPA enforcement | Mandatory national law with PIPC oversight |
| Testing | Internal audits, no mandatory certification | CPO audits, security assessments, no formal certification |
| Penalties | $2,500-$7,500 per violation, private breach actions | Up to 3% revenue fines, criminal up to 5 years imprisonment |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CCPA and K-PIPA
CCPA FAQ
K-PIPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea
The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the
Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GDPR vs ISO 37001
Compare GDPR vs ISO 37001: Data privacy powerhouse meets anti-bribery gold standard. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & synergies for risk mastery. Dive in now!
HITRUST CSF vs AS9100
Compare HITRUST CSF vs AS9100: Cybersecurity framework meets aerospace QMS. Uncover differences, mappings & implementation for compliance. Choose wisely now!
DORA vs PMBOK
Discover DORA vs PMBOK: EU financial resilience regulation meets PMI project mgmt standard. Align compliance, risk & governance for success. Compare now!