CE Marking
EU marking for product conformity to harmonised requirements
TISAX
Automotive standard for information security assessment exchange
Quick Verdict
CE Marking declares product conformity for EEA market access, mandatory for regulated goods via self/third-party assessment. TISAX verifies automotive info security via tiered audits, demanded by OEMs for supplier trust. Both enable compliance and partnerships but target safety vs cybersecurity.
CE Marking
Conformité Européenne (CE) Marking
Key Features
- Manufacturer's declaration of conformity to EU essential requirements
- Enables free movement across EEA single market
- OJEU harmonised standards provide presumption of conformity
- Risk-proportionate conformity assessment modules A-H
- Requires technical file and DoC retention
TISAX
Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)
Key Features
- Standardized assessments shared via ENX portal
- Automotive-specific prototype protection controls
- Three risk-based assessment levels (AL1-AL3)
- VDA ISA catalog with 70+ tailored controls
- Reduces duplicate audits across OEMs
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CE Marking Details
What It Is
CE Marking (Conformité Européenne) is the EU's mandatory conformity marking for products under harmonised legislation like the New Legislative Framework (NLF). It signifies the manufacturer's declaration that products meet essential health, safety, and environmental requirements. The risk-based approach scales scrutiny via conformity modules (A-H), from self-assessment to Notified Body verification.
Key Components
- Essential requirements from directives (e.g., LVD, Machinery, RED).
- Harmonised standards published in OJEU for presumption of conformity.
- Technical documentation, EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC), and CE affixation.
- Post-market surveillance under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. Self-declaration for low-risk; third-party for high-risk.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EEA market access, it prevents legal penalties, customs holds, and recalls. Provides single-market scale, risk management, and competitive trust. Builds stakeholder confidence through auditable compliance.
Implementation Overview
Map applicable directives, conduct risk assessments, compile technical files, issue DoC, affix CE mark. Applies to manufacturers/importers in electronics, machinery, medical devices. Varies by risk; Notified Body audits for high-risk. Typical for mid-sized firms across EU/EEA.
TISAX Details
What It Is
TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is an industry framework developed by the ENX Association and VDA for standardizing information security assessments in the automotive supply chain. Its primary purpose is to verify protection of sensitive data like IP, prototypes, and personal information against cyber threats. It uses a risk-based approach with VDA ISA catalog controls, building on ISO 27001.
Key Components
- 7 control groups (e.g., Policy, Access Control, Operations) with 70+ items.
- **Three assessment levelsBasic (self), Significant (remote), Very High (on-site).
- Modules for information security, prototype protection, data protection.
- 3-year labels shared via ENX portal.
Why Organizations Use It
- Contractual mandates from OEMs like BMW, Volkswagen.
- Risk mitigation, efficiency (reduces duplicate audits 70-90%).
- Market access, revenue growth, trust in €2.5T supply chain.
Implementation Overview
Phased: preparation/gap analysis (1-3 months), remediation/tabletops (3-9 months), audit/certification (2-4 months). Targets automotive suppliers/OEMs globally; scalable for SMEs to enterprises via self-assessments or audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CE Marking | TISAX |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Product health/safety/environmental conformity | Information security in automotive supply chain |
| Industry | All manufacturing sectors EEA-wide | Automotive suppliers and partners primarily Europe |
| Nature | Mandatory product conformity declaration | Voluntary industry security assessment exchange |
| Testing | Self/third-party conformity assessment modules | AL1 self/AL2 remote/AL3 on-site audits |
| Penalties | Market withdrawal fines recalls by authorities | Contract loss OEM exclusion no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CE Marking and TISAX
CE Marking FAQ
TISAX FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T
How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 55001 vs Australian Privacy Act
Discover ISO 55001 vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare asset governance with privacy rules for seamless compliance. Align standards to cut risks, boost data security & ensure regulatory wins. Dive in!
ISO 27018 vs FedRAMP
ISO 27018 vs FedRAMP: Privacy code for cloud PII vs US federal security baselines. Compare controls, audits, costs & benefits to elevate compliance. Discover now!
PMBOK vs Basel III
Discover PMBOK vs Basel III: Compare project governance standards with banking regulations for superior compliance, risk management, and tailored implementation in finance. (152 characters)