CE Marking
EU marking for product conformity to harmonised legislation
WEEE
EU directive for waste electrical and electronic equipment
Quick Verdict
CE Marking declares product conformity to EU safety rules for market access, while WEEE mandates producer responsibility for e-waste collection and recycling. Companies adopt CE for legal EEA sales; WEEE to finance sustainable end-of-life management and avoid penalties.
CE Marking
CE Marking (Conformité Européenne)
Key Features
- Manufacturer's self-declaration of EU conformity
- Enables free EEA single market circulation
- Mandatory only for harmonised legislation products
- OJEU standards grant presumption of conformity
- Risk-based assessment modules self or notified body
WEEE
Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
Key Features
- Extended Producer Responsibility for end-of-life financing
- Open scope covering all electrical/electronic equipment
- 65% collection targets based on market placement
- Selective depollution and recovery/recycling standards
- National registration with harmonized reporting formats
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CE Marking Details
What It Is
CE marking (Conformité Européenne) is the manufacturer's declaration of conformity with EU harmonised legislation on health, safety, and environmental protection. It's a New Legislative Framework (NLF) mechanism for regulated products, enabling free EEA circulation. The risk-based approach uses essential requirements, met via harmonised standards or equivalent measures.
Key Components
- Applicable directives (e.g., LVD 2014/35/EU, Machinery)
- Conformity modules (A-H: internal control to full quality assurance)
- Technical file (design, risks, tests)
- EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) and CE affixation Self-declaration primary; Notified Body for high-risk.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandates EEA market access, prevents fines/recalls, provides OJEU presumption of conformity, builds stakeholder trust, reduces multi-country barriers, manages liability via evidence trails.
Implementation Overview
Map legislation, perform risk assessments, compile technical file, issue DoC, affix mark. For manufacturers/importers of covered products; all sizes/industries. No central certification—surveillance-ready docs essential.
WEEE Details
What It Is
Directive 2012/19/EU (WEEE Directive) is a binding EU regulation establishing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for end-of-life management of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). Its primary purpose is to minimize e-waste environmental impacts, promote circular economy via prevention, reuse, recycling, and recovery, with open scope covering all EEE since 2018.
Key Components
- Six open categories in Annex III for EEE classification.
- **Collection targets65% of EEE placed on market (POM) or 85% of WEEE generated.
- **Treatment standardsSelective depollution (Annex II), recovery/recycling targets.
- **EPR pillarsProducer registration, financing, reporting via national schemes/PROs; no central certification, compliance through national enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU market access; reduces risks from hazardous waste, illegal exports; enables critical raw material recovery; builds stakeholder trust via traceability and Green Deal alignment; competitive edge through eco-design.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, national registrations, PRO joining, POM reporting setup, reverse logistics. Applies to producers/importers selling EEE in EU/EEA; multi-jurisdictional; ongoing audits, no formal certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CE Marking | WEEE |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Product safety, health, conformity to EU directives | End-of-life collection, treatment, recycling of EEE |
| Industry | Manufacturers of harmonised EU products, EEA-wide | EEE producers/importers, EU Member States individually |
| Nature | Mandatory self/third-party conformity declaration | Mandatory Extended Producer Responsibility regulation |
| Testing | Conformity assessment modules, notified bodies if required | Treatment/recovery verification by facilities, no product testing |
| Penalties | Market withdrawal, fines by national authorities | National fines, retroactive fees, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CE Marking and WEEE
CE Marking FAQ
WEEE FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance
Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
K-PIPA vs GRI
Compare K-PIPA vs GRI: Korea's consent-driven privacy law meets global impact reporting standards. Unlock CPO duties, materiality processes, breach rules & HES metrics for compliance edge. Explore now!
ISO 22000 vs ISO 14064
Compare ISO 22000 vs ISO 14064: Food safety FSMS with HACCP meets GHG inventories & verification. Uncover HLS/PDCA diffs, scopes & integration for compliance. Dive in now!
ITIL vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
ITIL vs MLPS 2.0: Compare ITIL's agile ITSM practices for value-driven services with MLPS 2.0's graded cybersecurity protections for China compliance. Optimize your strategy—read now!