What is the primary objective of **ISO 22000**?

**ISO 22000 enables organizations to consistently provide safe products and services by preventing, eliminating, or reducing food safety hazards to acceptable levels.** It establishes, implements, maintains, and continually improves a **Food Safety Management System (FSMS)** through interactive communication, **Prerequisite Programs (PRPs)**, and **HACCP** principles. The standard integrates two PDCA cycles—one organizational (Clauses 4–7, 9–10) for governance and one operational (Clause 8) for hazard control—ensuring compliance with statutory, regulatory, and customer requirements while supporting certification.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 22000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 22000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It applies professionally to any entity directly or indirectly in the food chain, including primary producers, feed producers, processors, packaging providers, transport, storage, retail, food services, and related suppliers. Certification demonstrates FSMS assurance to customers, regulators, and markets, often mandated by contracts or GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.

Does **ISO 22000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 22000 does not require external audit or third-party certification, but certification provides independent FSMS verification.** Performed by accredited certification bodies, the process includes Stage 1 (readiness review) and Stage 2 (implementation audit), followed by annual surveillance and triennial recertification. Organizations must demonstrate full clause compliance, including **PRPs**, hazard analysis, internal audits, and management reviews.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 22000** be performed?

**Internal audits for ISO 22000 must be conducted at planned intervals, with risk-based frequency targeting high-risk processes more often.** Management reviews occur at predetermined intervals, typically quarterly or semi-annually, incorporating audit results, performance data, and nonconformities. External surveillance audits happen annually post-certification, with full recertification every three years; continual verification of **PRPs**, **CCPs**, and **OPRPs** is ongoing.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 22000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 22000 results in certification denial, suspension, or withdrawal by the certification body.** Internally, it risks food safety incidents, recalls, regulatory penalties under local laws (e.g., fines, shutdowns), litigation, brand damage, and supply chain exclusion. Uncontrolled hazards lead to operational failures in **PRPs**, hazard control plans, traceability, or withdrawals, amplifying financial and reputational losses.

Can **ISO 22000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 22000:2018 follows the High-Level Structure (HLS), enabling seamless mapping and integration with other ISO management system standards.** Its 10-clause framework (Clauses 4–10) aligns with ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001 for combined audits and shared processes like risk planning, internal audits, and management reviews, reducing duplication while preserving food safety specifics.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 22000**?

**The first step is defining the FSMS scope and understanding the organization's context per Clause 4.** Identify internal/external issues, interested parties' requirements, and boundaries (products, sites, processes, outsourced activities). Form a cross-functional food safety team, conduct a gap analysis against all clauses, and secure top management commitment via a food safety policy.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 14064**?

**ISO 14064 provides requirements and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals.** The standard family—**ISO 14064-1:2018** for organizational inventories, **ISO 14064-2:2019** for project-level reductions/removals, and **ISO 14064-3:2019** for validation/verification—ensures inventories adhere to five principles: **relevance**, **completeness**, **consistency**, **transparency**, and **accuracy**. It enables credible GHG statements for regulatory reporting, investor disclosure, and carbon markets by defining boundaries, data quality, uncertainty management, and assurance processes.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 14064**?

**No organization is universally legally required to comply with ISO 14064, as it is a voluntary international standard.** However, organizations in regulated sectors (e.g., energy-intensive firms under EU ETS or national GHG reporting schemes) professionally adopt it for credible inventories. Users include companies, governments, NGOs, project developers, and verifiers needing auditable GHG data for compliance readiness, supply-chain demands, investor ESG reporting, or participation in emissions trading and climate finance.

Does **ISO 14064** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 14064 does not require external audit or third-party certification.** Parts 1 and 2 provide specifications for self-managed inventories and project accounting, while **ISO 14064-3** offers optional guidance for validation (forward-looking) or verification (historical) by competent, impartial bodies. In practice, third-party assurance under **ISO 14065:2020** enhances credibility for stakeholders, though it remains voluntary.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 14064** be performed?

**ISO 14064 assessments should be performed annually to ensure consistency and comparability.** Organizational inventories under **ISO 14064-1** cover a defined reporting period (typically calendar or fiscal year), with base-year recalculations for significant structural changes. Project monitoring under **ISO 14064-2** follows defined plans, and verification under **ISO 14064-3** aligns with reporting cycles or stakeholder needs, supporting ongoing transparency and accuracy.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 14064**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 14064 carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary.** Indirect risks include invalidated GHG claims leading to greenwashing accusations, rejected disclosures in regulatory programs or carbon markets, lost investor confidence, supply-chain disqualification, and higher verification costs from poor data quality. Weak inventories undermine decarbonization strategies and expose organizations to reputational damage.

Can **ISO 14064** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 14064 aligns closely with the GHG Protocol's principles and categories.** Its five principles (**relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy**) mirror GHG Protocol requirements, enabling interoperable inventories for Scopes 1-3. It supports integration with environmental management systems like **ISO 14001** via PDCA cycles, though mappings depend on specific use cases.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 14064**?

**The first step is defining organizational and operational boundaries.** Under **ISO 14064-1**, select a consolidation approach (**equity share** or **control**—financial/operational) and identify emission sources/sinks across Scopes 1-3, ensuring **relevance** to decision-making needs. Document rationale, base year, and exclusions for transparency.

ISO 22000 vs ISO 14064

Standards Comparison

ISO 22000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for food safety management systems

ISO 14064

Voluntary

2018

International standard for GHG quantification, reporting, verification

Quick Verdict

ISO 22000 ensures food safety via integrated FSMS and hazard controls for food chain organizations, while ISO 14064 enables credible GHG inventories and verification for all sectors. Companies adopt them for certification, compliance, risk management, and market access.

Food Safety

ISO 22000

ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Adopts High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
Dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
Integrates HACCP with PRP, OPRP, and CCP categorization
Risk-based hazard analysis across food chain
Interactive communication and supplier verification requirements

Greenhouse Gas Accounting

ISO 14064

ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases quantification standards

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Three-part structure: inventories, projects, assurance
Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
Scopes 1-3 organizational emission boundaries
Third-party validation and verification processes
Baseline scenarios and additionality for projects

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

ISO 22000:2018 is the international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It provides a framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through hazard prevention, regulatory compliance, and chain-wide communication. Built on a risk-based approach with HACCP principles and High-Level Structure (HLS).

Key Components

Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Integrates PRPs, OPRPs, CCPs in hazard control plans.
Dual **PDCA cyclesorganizational and operational.
Certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/regulatory demands for food safety assurance.
Reduces risks of recalls, contamination, and liability.
Enables market access, GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
Builds trust with stakeholders, integrates with ISO 9001/14001.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard plans, training, audits.
Applies to all food chain actors, scalable by size.
Typical 6-18 months; requires internal audits, management reviews.

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

ISO 14064 (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) is a voluntary international standard family for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. It provides modular specifications for organizational inventories (Part 1), project reductions (Part 2), and assurance (Part 3), using a principle-based approach emphasizing boundaries, data quality, and transparency.

Key Components

**Three partsOrganizational GHG inventories, project accounting, validation/verification.
**Five core principlesRelevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
Aligned with GHG Protocol; structured requirements for Scopes 1-3, baselines, monitoring.
Assurance model via independent verification, not certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor disclosures, carbon markets.
Mitigates greenwashing risks, enables green finance access.
Drives operational efficiencies, hotspot identification, decarbonization.
Builds stakeholder credibility through auditable claims.

Implementation Overview

**Phased rolloutGovernance, boundaries, data systems, verification.
Suits all sizes/industries globally; involves training, software, audits.
Optional third-party assurance enhances market trust. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 22000	ISO 14064
Scope	Food safety management systems (FSMS)	GHG emissions quantification and reporting
Industry	Food chain organizations worldwide	All sectors with GHG footprints globally
Nature	Voluntary certifiable management standard	Voluntary GHG accounting and verification standard
Testing	Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits	Independent validation/verification of inventories
Penalties	Loss of certification, market access denial	No formal penalties, reduced credibility

Scope

ISO 22000

Food safety management systems (FSMS)

ISO 14064

GHG emissions quantification and reporting

Industry

ISO 22000

Food chain organizations worldwide

ISO 14064

All sectors with GHG footprints globally

Nature

ISO 22000

Voluntary certifiable management standard

ISO 14064

Voluntary GHG accounting and verification standard

Testing

ISO 22000

Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

ISO 14064

Independent validation/verification of inventories

Penalties

ISO 22000

Loss of certification, market access denial

ISO 14064

No formal penalties, reduced credibility

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 22000 and ISO 14064

ISO 22000 FAQ

ISO 14064 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)

Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs C-TPAT

Discover CSL vs C-TPAT: China's Cybersecurity Law meets US supply chain security. Expert comparison, compliance strategies & implementation roadmap. Secure global trade now!

CAA vs EMAS

Compare CAA vs EMAS: US Clean Air Act's strict regs vs EU voluntary EMS for performance & transparency. Unlock compliance strategies for global success. Discover now!

SOX vs C-TPAT

Compare SOX vs C-TPAT: Unlock key differences in financial controls & supply chain security. Boost compliance efficiency, cut risks, and drive strategic gains. Read expert insights now!

ISO 22000

ISO 14064

Quick Verdict

ISO 22000

Key Features

ISO 14064

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 22000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 22000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 22000?

Does ISO 22000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 22000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 22000?

Can ISO 22000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 22000?

ISO 14064 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 14064?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 14064?

Does ISO 14064 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 14064 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 14064?

Can ISO 14064 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 14064?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs C-TPAT

CAA vs EMAS

SOX vs C-TPAT