CMMC
DoD certification model for DIB cybersecurity maturity
AS9120B
Aerospace QMS standard for parts distributors.
Quick Verdict
CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting FCI/CUI, while AS9120B provides quality management for aerospace distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention. Organizations adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; AS9120B for supply chain access and trust.
CMMC
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program
Key Features
- Three cumulative levels aligned to FAR/NIST controls
- Third-party C3PAO assessments for Level 2 certification
- DIBCAC government assessments for Level 3 APT defenses
- Limited POA&Ms with strict 180-day closure requirements
- Supply chain flow-down via DFARS contract clauses
AS9120B
AS9120B Quality Management Systems - Requirements
Key Features
- Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
- Traceability and chain-of-custody controls for split lots
- Risk-based external provider evaluation and monitoring
- Configuration management via sales order identifiers
- Preservation and storage controls for product conformity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CMMC Details
What It Is
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program, codified in 32 CFR Part 170, is a DoD certification framework verifying cybersecurity for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It uses a tiered, cumulative maturity model with three levels, mapping to FAR 52.204-21, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 (110 controls), and NIST SP 800-172 (24 enhancements).
Key Components
- 14 domains (e.g., Access Control, Incident Response) with 17 (Level 1), 110 (Level 2), or 134 (Level 3) practices.
- Built on NIST controls; assessment via interview, examine, test.
- Certification model: self-assessments (Level 1/2), C3PAO (Level 2), DIBCAC (Level 3); SPRS/eMASS reporting; limited POA&Ms (180 days).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for DoD contractors/subcontractors; contract ineligibility without certification.
- Reduces cyber risks, supply chain compromises; enhances bid competitiveness.
- Builds operational resilience, lowers incident costs; gains primes' trust.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scope/gap analysis, remediate, assess, sustain.
- Targets DIB firms (SMEs to primes); U.S.-focused.
- Requires SSP, evidence artifacts; 3-year validity, annual affirmations.
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aviation, space, and defense distributors. It augments ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure with distributor-specific requirements. Primary purpose: ensure traceability, prevent counterfeit parts, and maintain product conformity without altering characteristics. Adopts a risk-based thinking approach via Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA).
Key Components
- Over 100 aerospace additions to ISO 9001 clauses 4-10.
- Core areas: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operations (traceability, preservation, external providers), performance evaluation, improvement.
- Built on 10-clause HLS; emphasizes counterfeit prevention, configuration management, supplier controls.
- Certification via accredited bodies, OASIS listing.
Why Organizations Use It
- Commercial necessity for OEM supply chains.
- Mitigates risks like traceability loss, documentation errors.
- Builds customer trust, enables market access (2,442 global certifications).
- Enhances efficiency, reduces nonconformities.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
- Applies to distributors globally; scales by size.
- Requires internal audits, management reviews, Stage 1/2 certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CMMC | AS9120B |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI protection | Quality management for aerospace distribution |
| Industry | Defense Industrial Base (DoD contractors) | Aerospace parts distributors globally |
| Nature | Mandatory certification for DoD contracts | Voluntary QMS certification (ISO 9001-based) |
| Testing | Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years | Third-party certification audits (3-year cycle) |
| Penalties | Contract ineligibility, debarment | Loss of certification, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CMMC and AS9120B
CMMC FAQ
AS9120B FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 9001 vs REACH
Discover ISO 9001 vs REACH: Compare QMS excellence with chemical regs for compliance mastery. Boost efficiency, cut risks—unlock global success now!
APPI vs POPIA
APPI vs POPIA: Japan's broad data law (PPC, ¥100M fines, extraterritorial) vs SA's 8-condition framework (IO mandatory, ZAR10M penalties). Master key diffs for seamless compliance.
K-PIPA vs NIST 800-171
Discover K-PIPA vs NIST 800-171: Compare Korea's strict privacy law with US CUI cybersecurity standards. Unlock differences, compliance strategies, and global tips to protect data effectively.