Standards Comparison

    CMMC

    Mandatory
    2021

    DoD certification framework verifying cybersecurity for defense contractors

    VS

    J-SOX

    Mandatory
    2008

    Japan's regulation for internal controls over financial reporting

    Quick Verdict

    CMMC certifies cybersecurity for DoD contractors protecting FCI/CUI via tiered assessments, while J-SOX mandates financial reporting controls for Japanese listed firms with annual management evaluation and auditor attestation. DoD suppliers adopt CMMC for contracts; listed companies use J-SOX for compliance and investor trust.

    Cybersecurity Maturity

    CMMC

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Three cumulative levels protecting FCI to APT threats
    • Third-party C3PAO and DIBCAC assessments for verification
    • Direct mapping to NIST 800-171 and 800-172 controls
    • Mandatory flow-down across DIB supply chain subcontractors
    • POA&Ms with strict 180-day closure requirements
    Financial Reporting

    J-SOX

    Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Management assessment of ICFR effectiveness
    • Auditor attestation on management reports
    • Explicit IT response component in framework
    • Risk-based scoping for listed companies
    • Principles-based control design flexibility

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CMMC Details

    What It Is

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is a DoD certification program verifying cybersecurity protections for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It uses a tiered, risk-based model with three cumulative levels: Level 1 (basic FCI safeguards), Level 2 (NIST SP 800-171 for CUI), and Level 3 (NIST SP 800-172 enhancements against APTs).

    Key Components

    • 14 domains (e.g., Access Control, Incident Response) with 17 Level 1, 110 Level 2, and 24 additional Level 3 practices.
    • Built on FAR 52.204-21, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, and NIST SP 800-172.
    • Assessment model: self-assessments (Levels 1/2), C3PAO (Level 2), DIBCAC (Level 3), with SPRS/eMASS reporting and limited POA&Ms.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for DoD contractors/subcontractors; ensures contract eligibility, reduces supply chain risks, enhances resilience, and provides competitive advantage in bids. Builds stakeholder trust via verified maturity.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scoping, gap analysis, remediation, assessment preparation, certification, sustainment. Applies to all DIB sizes; requires SSPs, evidence collection, annual affirmations. Typical for SMEs: 12 months, high effort.

    J-SOX Details

    What It Is

    J-SOX, or Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) internal control provisions, is a regulation mandating internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) for listed companies. Enacted in 2006 and effective from April 2008, its primary purpose is ensuring reliable financial disclosures through management assessment and risk-based evaluation, covering consolidated entities and subsidiaries.

    Key Components

    • COSO framework augmented with IT response and asset preservation.
    • Five core components plus IT: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information & Communication, Monitoring.
    • Entity-level, process-level, and ITGC controls.
    • Management evaluation with auditor attestation on report reliability.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for ~3,800 listed firms to restore investor confidence.
    • Mitigates misstatement risks, reduces audit costs via efficiency.
    • Enhances governance, operational resilience, and market trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Phased approachgovernance, scoping, design, testing, reporting.
    • Applies to listed Japanese companies, multinationals with subsidiaries.
    • Requires documentation, ITGC focus, annual assessments, no formal certification but FSA oversight.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CMMC
    Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI in DoD contracts
    J-SOX
    Internal controls over financial reporting

    Industry

    CMMC
    Defense Industrial Base contractors
    J-SOX
    Japanese listed companies and subsidiaries

    Nature

    CMMC
    Mandatory certification for DoD contracts
    J-SOX
    Mandatory FIEA reporting for listed firms

    Testing

    CMMC
    Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years
    J-SOX
    Management evaluation + auditor attestation annually

    Penalties

    CMMC
    Contract ineligibility, debarment
    J-SOX
    Fines, imprisonment, delisting

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CMMC and J-SOX

    CMMC FAQ

    J-SOX FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages