CE Marking
EU marking for product conformity to harmonised legislation
ISO 56002
International guidance for innovation management systems
Quick Verdict
CE Marking mandates EU product safety compliance for market access, while ISO 56002 provides voluntary guidance for systematic innovation management. Manufacturers require CE for legal sales; all firms adopt ISO 56002 to build repeatable innovation capabilities and competitive edge.
CE Marking
CE Marking (Conformité Européenne)
Key Features
- Manufacturer's legally binding conformity declaration to EU rules
- Enables free product circulation across EEA markets
- OJEU harmonised standards provide presumption of conformity
- Risk-proportionate conformity assessment modules A-H
- Mandatory technical documentation retention for 10 years
ISO 56002
ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system guidance
Key Features
- PDCA cycle with clauses 4-10 structure
- Leadership commitment and future-focus principles
- Portfolio governance and uncertainty management
- Balanced KPIs for input-throughput-outcome-learning
- Tailorable to SMEs and all sectors
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CE Marking Details
What It Is
CE Marking (Conformité Européenne) is the EU's mandatory conformity marking for products under harmonised legislation. It signifies the manufacturer's declaration that products meet essential health, safety, environmental, and consumer protection requirements. Scope covers categories like electrical equipment, machinery, toys, and medical devices via directives/regulations (e.g., LVD 2014/35/EU). Key approach: risk-based, using New Legislative Framework (NLF) modules A-H for assessment.
Key Components
- Essential requirements from specific legislation.
- Harmonised standards in OJEU for presumption of conformity.
- Conformity modules (self-assessment or Notified Body).
- Technical documentation, EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC), and CE affixation. Compliance model: manufacturer-led self-declaration or third-party verification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EEA market access; enables free movement. Mitigates legal risks (fines, recalls), builds stakeholder trust, supports fair competition. Strategic benefits: streamlined supply chains, procurement advantages, innovation via standards.
Implementation Overview
Map applicable legislation, conduct risk assessment, compile technical file, issue DoC, affix mark. Applies to manufacturers/importers across industries/geographies targeting EEA. Notified Body audits for high-risk; retain docs 10+ years. Cross-functional teams handle testing, documentation, post-market surveillance.
ISO 56002 Details
What It Is
ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). It provides a generic, non-prescriptive framework applicable to all organizations, focusing on transforming innovation into a strategic capability via the PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- Seven core clauses (4-10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, culture, insights exploitation, uncertainty management, adaptability, systems thinking.
- Built on ISO High-Level Structure for integration; no fixed controls, emphasizes tailoring.
- Guidance only; pairs with certifiable ISO 56001.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives measurable innovation ROI, portfolio efficiency.
- Enhances resilience, market responsiveness.
- Builds stakeholder confidence; voluntary but strategic for competitiveness.
- Mitigates risks like resource waste, zombie projects.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: diagnose, design, pilot, scale, sustain (12-18 months typical).
- Involves diagnostics (e.g., PII), governance setup, tooling, KPIs.
- Suits all sizes/sectors; internal audits optional, certification via ISO 56001.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CE Marking | ISO 56002 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Product safety/compliance for EU market access | Innovation management system framework |
| Industry | Manufacturers of regulated products (electronics, machinery) | All organizations, sectors, sizes worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory EU marking for harmonized legislation | Voluntary guidance standard, non-certifiable |
| Testing | Conformity assessment, notified body for high-risk | Internal audits, management reviews, no mandatory testing |
| Penalties | Market withdrawal, fines, customs holds | No legal penalties, only lost competitive advantage |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CE Marking and ISO 56002
CE Marking FAQ
ISO 56002 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EN 1090 vs GRI
EN 1090 vs GRI: Compare EU steel/aluminium fabrication standards (CE marking, EXC classes, FPC) with global ESG reporting. Ensure compliance & sustainability edge. Dive in!
HIPAA vs IEC 62443
Compare HIPAA vs IEC 62443: Decode healthcare privacy/security rules vs industrial OT cybersecurity standards. Master compliance gaps, risks & strategies for regulated ops now!
FISMA vs TOGAF
Discover FISMA vs TOGAF: Compare federal cybersecurity law with enterprise architecture framework. Unlock strategies, pitfalls, implementation for compliant, resilient IT. Dive in now!