COBIT
Framework for enterprise IT governance and management
Basel III
Global regulatory framework for bank capital and liquidity standards
Quick Verdict
COBIT provides flexible I&T governance for all enterprises, while Basel III mandates capital and liquidity standards for banks. Organizations adopt COBIT for value optimization and risk management; banks use Basel III for regulatory compliance and financial resilience.
COBIT
COBIT 2019: Governance and Management Objectives
Key Features
- Tailored governance via 11 design factors and workflow
- 40 objectives across 5 domains EDM APO BAI DSS MEA
- Explicit separation of governance from management
- CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
- Goals cascade links stakeholders to enterprise metrics
Basel III
Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Key Features
- Strengthened CET1 capital requirements and buffers
- Non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for funding stability
- Enhanced Pillar 3 RWA comparability disclosures
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COBIT Details
What It Is
COBIT 2019 is ISACA's comprehensive framework for enterprise governance and management of information and technology (EGIT). It helps organizations create value from IT, manage risk, and optimize resources by translating stakeholder needs into actionable objectives via a tailored design approach using 11 design factors and goals cascade.
Key Components
- **5 domainsEDM (governance), APO (align/plan), BAI (build/implement), DSS (deliver/support), MEA (monitor/assess)
- 40 governance and management objectives in core model
- 6 governance system principles; 7 components (processes, structures, information, culture, skills, infrastructure)
- CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5); ISACA training certificates available
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns IT strategy with business via goals cascade
- Supports compliance/audit (SOX, GDPR alignments)
- Enables risk-optimized decisions and digital transformation
- Builds stakeholder trust through measurable outcomes
- Provides competitive edge in regulated industries
Implementation Overview
- **Phasedassess maturity, design scope, pilot objectives, deploy, monitor via MEA
- Involves training, RACI matrices, dashboards
- Applies to medium-large enterprises globally, all sectors
- No formal certification; focuses on self-assurance
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the global prudential regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) following the 2007-2009 financial crisis. As a non-binding international standard, it strengthens bank resilience by enhancing capital quality and quantity, introducing leverage and liquidity constraints, and improving risk measurement comparability. Its risk-based methodology integrates standardized and internal model approaches with simple backstops.
Key Components
- **Pillar 1Capital ratios (CET1 ≥4.5%, Tier 1 ≥6%, Total ≥8% of RWA), conservation/countercyclical/G-SIB buffers, 3% leverage ratio, LCR/NSFR liquidity standards.
- **Pillar 2Supervisory review (ICAAP, stress testing).
- **Pillar 3Granular disclosures for RWA, leverage, buffers (e.g., KM1, LR1, CDC templates). No fixed controls count; compliance via jurisdictional rules and RCAP assessments.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks implement for mandatory national compliance, avoiding fines/restrictions. It boosts resilience, reduces leverage excesses, lowers funding costs via market trust, and shapes strategic asset allocation. Enhances competitiveness through optimized capital/liquidity.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data/IT upgrades, governance, training. Targets internationally active banks globally; varies by jurisdiction/size. No certification; audited via reporting/disclosures/supervision.
Key Differences
| Aspect | COBIT | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise I&T governance and management | Bank capital, liquidity, leverage requirements |
| Industry | All industries worldwide, any size | Banking sector, internationally active banks |
| Nature | Voluntary governance framework | Mandatory prudential regulation |
| Testing | Capability/maturity assessments, self-audits | Regulatory reporting, supervisory reviews |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, certification loss | Fines, capital restrictions, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COBIT and Basel III
COBIT FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GDPR vs FedRAMP
Discover GDPR vs FedRAMP: EU privacy gold standard meets US federal cloud security. Compare scopes, fines up to 4% turnover, baselines & compliance to conquer global regs.
IEC 62443 vs ISO 13485
Compare IEC 62443 vs ISO 13485: OT cybersecurity vs medical QMS standards. Key differences, synergies & integration tips for secure, compliant systems. Dive in now!
SOC 2 vs SOX
SOC 2 vs SOX: Decode key differences—voluntary security audits for SaaS vs mandatory financial controls for public firms. Build trust, cut risks—expert insights inside!