COBIT
ISACA framework for enterprise I&T governance and management
ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility
Quick Verdict
COBIT provides IT governance frameworks for enterprise value and risk management, while ISO 26000 offers non-certifiable guidance on social responsibility principles and core subjects. Organizations adopt COBIT for EGIT alignment; ISO 26000 for holistic SR integration.
COBIT
COBIT 2019: Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies
Key Features
- Tailors governance system using 11 design factors
- 40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM-APO-BAI-DSS-MEA)
- CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance management
- Explicit separation of governance from management
- Goals cascade links stakeholder needs to IT metrics
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Seven principles underpinning socially responsible behavior
- Seven core subjects for holistic SR assessment
- Non-certifiable voluntary guidance framework
- Stakeholder engagement for prioritization
- Integration throughout governance and operations
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COBIT Details
What It Is
COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies, is an ISACA framework for enterprise governance and management of information and technology (EGIT). It translates stakeholder needs into actionable objectives via a tailored, risk-optimized approach using design factors and a goals cascade.
Key Components
- 40 governance and management objectives grouped in 5 domains: EDM (governance), APO (strategy), BAI (delivery), DSS (operations), MEA (assurance).
- 6 governance system principles and 7 components (processes, structures, culture, etc.).
- CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5).
- No formal certification; compliance via self-assessments and audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns I&T with business value, manages risk, optimizes resources.
- Supports compliance (SOX, GDPR) and interoperability (ISO 27001, ITIL).
- Builds board-level oversight, reduces incidents, enhances transformation.
- Boosts stakeholder trust through measurable outcomes.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: assess gaps, design via 11 design factors, pilot objectives, measure via MEA.
- Applies to enterprises of all sizes/industries; requires training (Foundation, Design certificates).
- Involves maturity assessments, RACI, change management; audited internally/externally.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is an international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR), providing voluntary principles and practices for all organizations. Its primary purpose is to help assess impacts, risks, and stakeholder expectations holistically, using a contextual, stakeholder-driven approach rather than requirements.
Key Components
- **Seven principlesAccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- **Seven core subjectsOrganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
- Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; non-certifiable, emphasizing guidance over audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and ESG alignment.
- Builds stakeholder trust, operational resilience, and competitive edge.
- Supports voluntary reporting, due diligence, without legal mandates.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration, training.
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors; integrates with ISO 14001/45001.
- No certification; focuses on transparent communication and continuous improvement. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | COBIT | ISO 26000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise I&T governance and management | Social responsibility across 7 core subjects |
| Industry | All industries, enterprise-wide IT | All organizations, all sectors globally |
| Nature | Voluntary governance framework | Non-certifiable guidance standard |
| Testing | Capability/maturity assessments (0-5) | Self-assessment, no formal certification |
| Penalties | No legal penalties | No enforcement or penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COBIT and ISO 26000
COBIT FAQ
ISO 26000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs ISO 37301
Compare NIST CSF vs ISO 37301: Boost cybersecurity & compliance with key differences, strengths in risk management, governance. Find your ideal framework now!
ISO 45001 vs ISO 30301
Compare ISO 45001 vs ISO 30301: OH&S safety systems meet records management. Discover key differences, integration benefits, leadership roles & implementation roadmap for compliance success. Explore now!
BRC vs APRA CPS 234
Explore BRC vs APRA CPS 234: Compare food safety certification with financial info sec standards. Gain expert compliance strategies, implementation guides & risk insights for resilient ops today!