What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to help organizations create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources through enterprise governance and management (EGIT).** COBIT 2019 defines a core model of **40 governance and management objectives** across five domains (**EDM**, **APO**, **BAI**, **DSS**, **MEA**), supported by **six governance system principles** and **seven components** (processes, structures, policies, information, culture, skills, infrastructure). It uses a **goals cascade** to translate stakeholder needs into enterprise goals, alignment goals, and prioritized practices with **CMMI-based capability levels 0-5**.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework maintained by ISACA, not a regulation.** Professionally, it is adopted by enterprises reliant on I&T for value creation, risk management, and resource optimization, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and public utilities. Boards, executives, and GRC professionals use it to structure EGIT, with ISACA recommending **COBIT 2019 Foundation** and **Design & Implementation** training for governance leads.

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it is a framework, not a certifiable standard.** Organizations perform internal capability assessments using **COBIT Performance Management (CPM)** with **capability levels 0-5**. **MEA04 Managed Assurance** supports assurance activities, often integrated with internal audits or aligned to regulations via mappings.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed regularly to support dynamic governance, typically annually for full capability reviews and quarterly for prioritized objectives.** **COBIT Performance Management** uses CMMI-based levels 0-5, with **MEA** domain practices enabling ongoing monitoring via KPIs, gap analyses, and feedback loops tied to the **goals cascade**.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**Non-compliance with COBIT carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a voluntary framework.** Indirect consequences include unmitigated I&T risks, suboptimal value delivery, audit deficiencies when mapped to regulations, and failure to meet stakeholder expectations for EGIT, potentially leading to operational disruptions or regulatory scrutiny in aligned contexts.

An **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other international frameworks via its governance framework principles of alignment, openness, and flexibility.** The **40 objectives** and **components** integrate with operational standards, using design factors and toolkits to harmonize governance scopes without replacement.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate enterprise context using the goals cascade and 11 design factors to define a tailored governance system.** Per **APO02 Managed Strategy**, assess current capabilities, digital maturity, and gaps; then prioritize objectives via the **Design Guide toolkit** for initial scope.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27017**?

**ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific implementation guidance for ISO 27002 controls and introduces seven additional cloud-focused controls (CLD.6.3.1, CLD.8.1.5, CLD.9.5.1, CLD.9.5.2, CLD.12.1.5, CLD.12.4.5, CLD.13.1.4).** Published in 2015, it addresses shared responsibilities between **cloud service providers (CSPs)** and **cloud service customers (CSCs)**, covering multi-tenancy segregation, virtual machine hardening, asset removal/return, administrative operations security, customer monitoring, and network alignment in public, private, and hybrid clouds.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27017**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 27017, as it is a voluntary code of practice.** Professionally, **CSPs** and **CSCs** with significant cloud footprints adopt it to demonstrate due diligence, especially in regulated sectors or procurement demanding cloud security assurance; ~94% of organizations use cloud services, with 61% reporting incidents driving its relevance.

Does **ISO 27017** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27017 does not support standalone third-party certification or require external audits.** It is implemented within an **ISO 27001** ISMS, with auditors assessing its 37 extended controls and seven CLD controls during **ISO 27001** Stage 1/2 audits; certification bodies may reference ISO 27017 conformity as an extension.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27017** be performed?

**ISO 27017 assessments occur as part of annual ISO 27001 surveillance audits and triennial re-certification.** Controls are evaluated continuously via risk assessments, with changes in cloud services triggering reviews; aligns with ISO standards' typical annual re-certification cycle.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27017**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27017 carries no direct legal penalties, as it is not mandatory.** Indirect consequences include heightened cloud breach risks (e.g., misconfigurations in multi-tenancy), failed procurements, regulatory scrutiny under data laws, and competitive disadvantage for CSPs lacking auditable shared-responsibility evidence.

Can **ISO 27017** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27017 maps directly to ISO 27001/27002 control structures.** Its 37 extended and seven CLD controls integrate into ISO 27001 Annex A/ISO 27002:2022 (93 controls), enabling unified ISMS coverage; often bundled in joint audits for efficiency.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27017**?

**Conduct a cloud-specific risk assessment within your ISO 27001 ISMS to identify applicable controls.** Define ISMS scope including cloud services, map risks to 37 ISO 27002 guidance areas and seven CLD controls, then update the Statement of Applicability with shared CSP/CSC responsibilities.

COBIT vs ISO 27017

Standards Comparison

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Enterprise framework for IT governance and management

ISO 27017

Voluntary

2015

International code of practice for cloud security controls

Quick Verdict

COBIT provides comprehensive enterprise I&T governance across 40 objectives for all organizations, while ISO 27017 offers cloud-specific security controls extending ISO 27001. Companies adopt COBIT for holistic EGIT and ISO 27017 for cloud risk management.

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Tailored governance via 11 design factors and workflow
40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
CMMI-based performance management with 0-5 capability levels
Explicit separation of governance from management responsibilities
Goals cascade linking stakeholder needs to enterprise metrics

Cloud Security

ISO 27017

ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud security

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
Introduces 7 cloud-specific CLD security controls
Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 cloud adaptations
Addresses multi-tenancy segregation and VM hardening
Enables customer monitoring of cloud service activities

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019 is an enterprise governance and management framework for information and technology (I&T), developed by ISACA. It helps organizations create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources through a tailored governance system. Its risk-based, design-driven approach uses 11 design factors to customize objectives to enterprise context.

Key Components

40 governance and management objectives grouped into 5 domains: EDM (governance), APO (strategy), BAI (delivery), DSS (operations), MEA (assurance).
6 governance system principles and 7 components (processes, structures, policies, information, culture, skills, infrastructure).
CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5) and goals cascade.
No formal certification; uses capability assessments and ISACA training (Foundation, Design & Implementation).

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns I&T with business goals for value realization.
Supports compliance (SOX, GDPR) via mappable controls.
Enhances risk management and assurance (MEA04).
Builds stakeholder trust through measurable outcomes.
Enables digital transformation in regulated sectors.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: assess gaps, design via toolkit, pilot objectives, measure capabilities. Suited for medium-large enterprises across industries; voluntary with training focus.

ISO 27017 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice providing cloud-specific guidance for information security controls within an ISO 27001 ISMS. It extends ISO/IEC 27002 to address cloud risks like shared responsibilities and multi-tenancy via a risk-based approach.

Key Components

Additional implementation guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in cloud contexts
7 new CLD cloud-specific controls (e.g., responsibility delineation, VM configuration, segregation)
Built on ISO 27001/27002 frameworks
Integrated into ISO 27001 certification audits, no standalone certification

Why Organizations Use It

Clarifies CSP-CSC shared responsibilities to mitigate risk gaps
Meets procurement and regulatory demands (e.g., GDPR alignment)
Enhances cloud security posture and incident reduction
Provides competitive edge for CSPs and trust for customers
Supports multi-framework compliance mapping

Implementation Overview

Extend existing ISO 27001 ISMS through risk assessment and control mapping
Key activities: shared responsibility matrices, virtualization hardening, monitoring setup
Applicable to CSPs/CSCs of all sizes, cloud models (IaaS/PaaS/SaaS)
Audited as part of annual ISO 27001 surveillance

Key Differences

Aspect	COBIT	ISO 27017
Scope	Enterprise I&T governance and management	Cloud-specific information security controls
Industry	All industries worldwide, any size	Cloud providers and users, global
Nature	Voluntary governance framework	Guidance code of practice
Testing	Capability/maturity assessments (0-5)	Integrated into ISO 27001 audits
Penalties	No legal penalties	No legal penalties

Scope

COBIT

Enterprise I&T governance and management

ISO 27017

Cloud-specific information security controls

Industry

COBIT

All industries worldwide, any size

ISO 27017

Cloud providers and users, global

Nature

COBIT

Voluntary governance framework

ISO 27017

Guidance code of practice

Testing

COBIT

Capability/maturity assessments (0-5)

ISO 27017

Integrated into ISO 27001 audits

Penalties

COBIT

No legal penalties

ISO 27017

No legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COBIT and ISO 27017

COBIT FAQ

ISO 27017 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPEDA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Uncover PIPEDA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Key differences in privacy, breach reporting & governance. Master cross-border compliance strategies today!

TOGAF vs ISO 26000

Compare TOGAF vs ISO 26000: EA framework for IT alignment meets SR guidance for ethical ops. Unlock governance, sustainability & strategy synergies. Explore now!

SAFe vs IFS Food

Compare SAFe vs IFS Food: Scale enterprise agile with SAFe or master food safety compliance via IFS? Discover key differences, benefits & tips to choose wisely. (152 characters)

COBIT

ISO 27017

Quick Verdict

COBIT

Key Features

ISO 27017

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27017 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

An COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

ISO 27017 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27017?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27017?

Does ISO 27017 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27017 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27017?

Can ISO 27017 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27017?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPEDA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

TOGAF vs ISO 26000

SAFe vs IFS Food