COPPA
U.S. law requiring parental consent for child online data collection
CIS Controls
Prioritized cybersecurity framework for essential cyber hygiene
Quick Verdict
COPPA mandates parental consent for child data collection on child-directed sites, enforced by FTC fines up to $170M. CIS Controls offer voluntary cybersecurity hygiene across 18 domains via Implementation Groups. Companies adopt COPPA for legal compliance, CIS for resilient defenses.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Mandates verifiable parental consent for under-13 data collection
- Targets child-directed websites, apps, and online services
- Defines broad PII including geolocation, device IDs, multimedia
- Imposes FTC enforcement with $43,792 per-violation penalties
- Provides parents data access, review, and deletion rights
CIS Controls
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1
Key Features
- 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
- Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable adoption
- Asset and software inventory as foundational hygiene
- Mappings to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, HIPAA frameworks
- Free Benchmarks and Navigator tools for implementation
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998, effective 2000, enforced by the FTC. It protects children under 13 from unauthorized online data collection by commercial websites, apps, and services directed at kids or with actual knowledge of child users. Core approach mandates verifiable parental consent (VPC) prior to collection, use, or disclosure, with 2013 amendments expanding personal information (PII) scope.
Key Components
- **Operator obligationsPrivacy policies, VPC, parental access/review/deletion, data security, minimization.
- **PII definitionNames, addresses, persistent IDs (IP, device), geolocation, audio/video files.
- **VPC methods11+ options like credit cards, video calls (sliding scale by risk).
- **Safe harborsFTC-approved self-regulatory programs (e.g., ESRB, iKeepSafe).
- Compliance model: No certification but FTC audits, penalties up to $43,792/violation.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal mandate avoids massive fines (e.g., YouTube's $170M). Enhances trust, reduces breach risks, enables global operations targeting U.S. kids. Builds reputation in edtech, gaming; supports data minimization for efficiency.
Implementation Overview
Assess audience for child-appeal, deploy age gates, VPC mechanisms, policies. Applies to commercial operators worldwide if U.S. kids targeted. Key activities: Audits, training, third-party reviews. No formal certification; ongoing FTC compliance via documentation.
CIS Controls Details
What It Is
CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls) v8.1 is a community-driven, prescriptive cybersecurity framework of prioritized best practices to reduce attack surfaces and enhance resilience. It applies to all industries and organization sizes via Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3), using an asset-centric, risk-based approach with actionable safeguards.
Key Components
- 18 controls across hygiene, organizational, and advanced domains, with 153 safeguards.
- Focus on asset inventory, data protection, access management, vulnerability remediation.
- Built on real-world attack data; scalable via IG1 (56 essentials), IG2/IG3 (advanced).
- No formal certification; self-assessed compliance with mappings to NIST, ISO 27001.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates 85% common attacks, cuts breach costs, accelerates compliance (NIST, HIPAA).
- Builds trust with insurers, partners; enables efficiency, cyber insurance discounts.
- Strategic ROI via reduced incidents, operational streamlining.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: governance, discovery, foundational (IG1), expansion (IG2/IG3), validation.
- Key activities: asset inventories, automation, training, metrics tracking.
- Universal applicability; free tools like Benchmarks, Navigator aid SMBs to enterprises.
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | CIS Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Child privacy online data collection under 13 | Comprehensive cybersecurity across 18 domains |
| Industry | Commercial websites/apps targeting children globally | All industries/sectors, all organization sizes |
| Nature | Mandatory U.S. federal regulation, FTC enforced | Voluntary cybersecurity best practices framework |
| Testing | No formal testing; compliance via audits/consent | Penetration testing, continuous assessments (Control 18) |
| Penalties | $43,792 per violation, e.g. YouTube $170M | No legal penalties, reputational/business risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and CIS Controls
COPPA FAQ
CIS Controls FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap
How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs
Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 56002 vs Basel III
Compare ISO 56002 vs Basel III: Innovation management framework meets banking capital, liquidity & resilience standards. Gain strategic insights for compliance, risk & growth. Discover now!
ISO 14001 vs PIPEDA
Compare ISO 14001 vs PIPEDA: Decode environmental EMS vs privacy law differences. Boost compliance, cut risks, integrate strategies for sustainable success now!
IFS Food vs ISO 28000
Compare IFS Food vs ISO 28000: Food safety audits meet supply chain security. Uncover differences in risk management, audits & compliance for resilient operations. Choose now!