COPPA
U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data
EN 1090
EU standard for execution of steel and aluminium structures.
Quick Verdict
COPPA protects children's online privacy via parental consent for US websites/apps, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking through FPC for EU structural steel/aluminium. Companies adopt COPPA for compliance amid FTC fines; EN 1090 for market access and liability control.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Requires verifiable parental consent prior to child data collection
- Protects children under 13 from unauthorized online tracking
- Broad personal information definition includes persistent IDs, geolocation
- Imposes FTC penalties up to $43,792 per violation
- Mandates privacy notices, data security, parental access rights
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Execution Classes (EXC1-4) for risk-scaled requirements
- Factory Production Control (FPC) certification by Notified Body
- CE marking and Declaration of Performance (DoP)
- Welding quality management per ISO 3834
- Material traceability and NDT inspection regimes
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998, effective April 2000, enforced by the FTC. It safeguards online privacy of children under 13 by mandating verifiable parental consent before operators collect, use, or disclose personal information. Its control-based approach targets commercial websites, apps, and IoT directed to kids or with actual knowledge of child users.
Key Components
- Verifiable parental consent (VPC) via 11+ methods like credit cards or video calls.
- Expansive personal information definition: names, geolocation, persistent IDs, audio/video.
- Requirements for privacy policies, parental notices, access/review/deletion rights, data security.
- Data minimization and safe harbors for self-regulation.
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures legal compliance amid rising enforcement and fines (e.g., YouTube's $170M). Mitigates risks from breaches, builds parental/stakeholder trust, avoids reputational damage. Provides competitive edge in edtech, gaming via ethical practices; extraterritorial for U.S.-targeted services.
Implementation Overview
Conduct audience analysis for child-directed content, deploy age gates, VPC mechanisms, policies. Applies to commercial operators globally; high burden for small businesses but tools like generators aid. No formal certification but FTC audits; typical timeline 6-12 months with training, audits.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is the harmonized European standard family for the execution of steel and aluminium structures. It provides technical requirements and conformity assessment under the EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR), enabling CE marking for load-bearing components. Its risk-based approach uses Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4) to scale requirements by failure consequence, service conditions, and production complexity.
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC), and Declaration of Performance (DoP).
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium (materials, welding, tolerances, corrosion protection, inspection).
- Core principles: traceability, welding per ISO 3834, NDT, and third-party Notified Body certification.
- No fixed control count; scales with EXC.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU market access; reduces liability, ensures safety. Benefits: risk mitigation, rework reduction, competitive bidding. Builds stakeholder trust via certified quality.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC build, personnel training, NB audits. Applies to fabricators in construction; 6-12 months typical. Requires FPC certification and surveillance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Child online privacy under 13 | Steel/aluminium structural execution |
| Industry | Online services, apps, global | Construction fabrication, EU/EEA |
| Nature | US federal law, FTC enforced | EU harmonized standard, mandatory CE |
| Testing | Parental consent verification | FPC certification, NB audits |
| Penalties | $43k/violation, $170M fines | Market exclusion, certificate suspension |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and EN 1090
COPPA FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance
Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37001 vs IEC 62443
Explore ISO 37001 vs IEC 62443: Anti-bribery ABMS meets IACS cybersecurity standards. Uncover key differences, benefits, implementation tips for robust compliance. Dive in!
UL Certification vs NIST 800-171
Compare UL Certification vs NIST 800-171: Product safety marks & factory audits vs CUI cybersecurity controls. Optimize compliance for defense & manufacturing. Dive in now!
ISO 9001 vs APRA CPS 234
Explore ISO 9001 vs APRA CPS 234: Global QMS excellence meets Australia's financial cyber resilience rules. Key differences, benefits & compliance strategies. Optimize now!