SOX
U.S. law mandating internal controls over financial reporting
EU AI Act
EU regulation for risk-based AI safety and governance
Quick Verdict
SOX mandates financial reporting controls for US public companies via audits and certifications, while EU AI Act regulates AI systems risk-based for EU markets with conformity assessments. Companies adopt SOX for investor trust and legal compliance, AI Act for market access and safety.
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- Mandates CEO/CFO certification of financial reports
- Requires ICFR assessment and auditor attestation
- Establishes PCAOB for audit firm oversight
- Enforces auditor independence and rotation rules
- Imposes criminal penalties for document tampering
EU AI Act
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Artificial Intelligence Act
Key Features
- Risk-based four-tier classification framework
- Prohibitions on unacceptable AI practices
- High-risk conformity assessment and CE marking
- GPAI systemic risk evaluations and reporting
- Lifecycle risk management and post-market monitoring
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOX Details
What It Is
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted post-Enron scandals. It mandates corporate accountability through internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and executive certifications. SOX employs a risk-based approach via COSO framework for control design, testing, and reporting.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive accountability (Titles III-XI).
- Core sections: 302/906 (certifications), 404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), 409 (real-time disclosures).
- Built on COSO principles; no fixed control count, focuses on key controls like ITGC, segregation of duties.
- Compliance model: annual management report, auditor attestation for most filers.
Why Organizations Use It
Public companies comply to avoid penalties, build investor trust, reduce restatements. Benefits include operational efficiency, fraud deterrence, M&A readiness. Enhances governance, lowers cost of capital.
Implementation Overview
Top-down risk scoping, documentation, testing, remediation cycles. Applies to U.S. public issuers; exemptions for smaller filers. Requires annual audits, continuous monitoring; phased rollout spans 18-24 months initially.
EU AI Act Details
What It Is
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the EU AI Act, is a comprehensive regulation establishing the first horizontal framework for AI governance. Its primary purpose is to ensure AI systems are safe, transparent, and respect fundamental rights across sectors. It employs a **risk-based approachprohibiting unacceptable risks, regulating high-risk systems, imposing transparency on limited-risk, and minimal oversight on others.
Key Components
- **Four risk tiersprohibited practices, high-risk obligations (e.g., risk management, data governance, cybersecurity per Articles 9-15), GPAI model rules (Chapter V), transparency duties.
- Over 100 requirements across lifecycle, with conformity assessments, CE marking, EU database registration.
- Built on safety, transparency, fairness, accountability; presumption of conformity via harmonized standards.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance for EU market access, avoiding fines up to 7% global turnover.
- Enhances risk management, builds trust, enables competitive differentiation in regulated sectors like healthcare, finance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased rollout (6-36 months); starts with AI inventory, classification, builds QMS, documentation, monitoring.
- Applies to providers/deployers EU-wide; involves audits, notified bodies for high-risk.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOX | EU AI Act |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Financial reporting & internal controls | AI systems by risk levels & lifecycle |
| Industry | US public companies & auditors | All AI providers/users in EU |
| Nature | US federal statute with SEC/PCAOB | EU regulation risk-based prohibitions |
| Testing | Annual ICFR audits & control testing | Conformity assessments & post-market monitoring |
| Penalties | Criminal fines up to $5M & 20 years prison | Fines up to 7% global turnover |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOX and EU AI Act
SOX FAQ
EU AI Act FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs
Master SOC 2 Type 2 audits with our guide: 10 red flags like incomplete logs/vendor gaps, model walkthrough answers, psychology tips. Pass first-time with <5% e

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
DORA vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
Compare DORA vs CSL: EU financial resilience meets China's data fortress. Key diffs in ICT risks, testing, third-party oversight & localization. Master global compliance now!
IEC 62443 vs ISO 13485
Compare IEC 62443 vs ISO 13485: OT cybersecurity vs medical QMS standards. Key differences, synergies & integration tips for secure, compliant systems. Dive in now!
ISO 14064 vs CMMI
Compare ISO 14064 vs CMMI: GHG standards for emissions reporting vs process maturity for ops excellence. Align sustainability & performance—discover key differences now!