COPPA
US regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data
FSSC 22000
GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management systems.
Quick Verdict
COPPA mandates parental consent for children's online data to protect kids under 13, while FSSC 22000 certifies food safety systems for supply chains. Companies adopt COPPA for legal compliance amid FTC fines; FSSC for global market access and buyer trust.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Mandates verifiable parental consent for under-13 data collection
- Targets operators directing to children or with actual knowledge
- Broad personal info definition including persistent IDs, geolocation
- Requires parental access, review, and data deletion rights
- FTC enforcement with up to $43,792 per-violation penalties
FSSC 22000
Food Safety System Certification 22000
Key Features
- Combines ISO 22000, sector PRPs, and Additional Requirements
- GFSI-benchmarked for global retailer acceptance
- Covers food chain categories from farming to chemicals
- Mandates food defense, fraud, and allergen management
- Requires rigorous certification audits and surveillance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), enacted 1998 and effective 2000, is a U.S. federal regulation enforced by the FTC. It safeguards online privacy of children under 13 by requiring verifiable parental consent before operators collect personal information from child-directed commercial websites, apps, or services. Its rule-based approach emphasizes parental control, data minimization, and security.
Key Components
- **Verifiable Parental Consent11+ methods (e.g., credit card, video call) on sliding scale.
- **Personal InformationBroadly defined—names, persistent IDs, geolocation, audio/video with child's image/voice.
- **Core ObligationsPrivacy notices, parental access/review/deletion, data security, limited retention.
- **Safe HarborsFTC-approved self-regulatory programs like ESRB, iKeepSafe.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets legal requirements avoiding $43,792/violation penalties (e.g., YouTube $170M fine).
- Mitigates enforcement risks amid rising child online activity.
- Builds parental/stakeholder trust in edtech, gaming sectors.
- Enables global operations targeting U.S. children.
Implementation Overview
- Analyze for child-directed content or actual knowledge.
- Deploy age screens, VPC, policies, audits.
- Applies to commercial operators worldwide handling U.S. kids' data.
- No formal certification; FTC oversight, safe harbor audits.
FSSC 22000 Details
What It Is
FSSC 22000 (Food Safety System Certification 22000) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies across food chain categories like manufacturing, packaging, and logistics, using a risk-based approach integrating ISO standards, PRPs, and additional requirements.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsISO 22000:2018 (FSMS clauses 4-10), sector-specific PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002 series), FSSC Additional Requirements (e.g., food defense, fraud, allergens).
- Over 100 requirements across management, operations, and verification.
- Built on PDCA cycle and HACCP principles; requires third-party certification audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer mandates and enables global market access.
- Reduces recalls, enhances supply chain trust, and supports SDGs.
- Manages risks like adulteration and contamination; boosts reputation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, audits.
- For food sector organizations worldwide; 6-12 months typical.
- Involves CB audits per ISO 22003-1, surveillance/recertification cycles.
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | FSSC 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Children's online privacy & data collection under 13 | Food safety management systems across food chain |
| Industry | Online services, apps, websites targeting children | Food manufacturing, packaging, transport, retail |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law enforced by FTC | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme |
| Testing | FTC enforcement actions & compliance reviews | Third-party certification audits (initial, surveillance) |
| Penalties | $43,792 per violation, e.g. YouTube $170M | Loss of certification, no direct financial penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and FSSC 22000
COPPA FAQ
FSSC 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs
Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i
Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance
Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SQF vs ISO 17025
Compare SQF vs ISO 17025: SQF delivers GFSI food safety certification for supply chains; ISO 17025 accredits lab testing competence. Unlock compliance insights now.
NIST CSF vs GLBA
Compare NIST CSF vs GLBA: See how NIST's flexible framework bolsters GLBA's privacy/safeguards rules for financial security. Align risks, boost compliance now!
EMAS vs ISO 27018
EMAS vs ISO 27018: Compare EU's premium eco-management scheme (ISO 14001+) with cloud PII privacy code. Drive verified compliance, transparency & performance gains. Discover key diffs now!