Standards Comparison

    NIST CSF

    Voluntary
    2024

    Voluntary framework for cybersecurity risk management

    VS

    GLBA

    Mandatory
    1999

    U.S. law for financial privacy notices and data safeguards

    Quick Verdict

    NIST CSF offers voluntary, flexible cybersecurity risk management for all organizations, while GLBA mandates privacy notices, opt-outs, and security programs for financial institutions. Companies adopt CSF for best practices; GLBA ensures regulatory compliance.

    Cybersecurity

    NIST CSF

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Introduces Govern function for overarching governance
    • Framework Profiles enable current-target gap analysis
    • Four Implementation Tiers assess maturity levels
    • Common language fosters risk communication
    • Non-prescriptive mappings to global standards
    Financial Privacy

    GLBA

    Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Privacy notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing
    • Comprehensive Safeguards Rule security program
    • Qualified Individual with board reporting
    • 30-day breach notification for 500+ consumers
    • Service provider oversight and risk assessments

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIST CSF Details

    What It Is

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline developed by NIST for managing cybersecurity risks. It offers a flexible, outcomes-focused approach applicable to organizations of all sizes, sectors, and maturity levels, emphasizing strategic alignment over prescriptive controls.

    Key Components

    • **Six Core FunctionsGovern (new), Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—covering the full cybersecurity lifecycle.
    • **Categories and Subcategories22 categories and 112 subcategories with informative references to standards like ISO 27001 and NIST SP 800-53.
    • **Implementation TiersPartial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier 4) for evaluating risk management sophistication.
    • **Framework ProfilesCurrent and Target profiles for gap analysis. No formal certification; relies on self-attestation.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Provides common language for internal/external risk communication.
    • Supports compliance, due care demonstration, and supply chain management.
    • Drives prioritization, reduces risks cost-effectively, builds stakeholder trust.
    • Mandatory for U.S. federal agencies; voluntary elsewhere with widespread adoption.

    Implementation Overview

    • Create Profiles, assess Tiers, prioritize via Core outcomes.
    • Leverage Quick Start Guides, mappings, and tooling.
    • Suited globally across industries; scalable from SMEs to enterprises.

    GLBA Details

    What It Is

    The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1999. It establishes privacy and security standards for financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). GLBA employs a risk-based approach through its Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule, focusing on transparency, consumer choice, and data protection.

    Key Components

    • **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Requires initial/annual notices and opt-out rights for nonaffiliated third-party sharing.
    • **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Mandates a comprehensive information security program with administrative, technical, and physical safeguards; includes ~9-16 elements like risk assessments, Qualified Individual, and vendor oversight.
    • **Pretexting ProvisionsProhibits obtaining information under false pretenses. Built on consumer protection principles; enforced via FTC for non-banks, with no formal certification but audits/enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance for covered entities to avoid penalties up to $100,000 per violation.
    • Enhances risk management, customer trust, and operational resilience.
    • Provides competitive edge through demonstrated privacy/security practices.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scoping, risk assessment, policy development, technical controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing, and ongoing monitoring. Applies to broad financial activities (banks, fintech, tax firms); suits all sizes, U.S.-focused, with board reporting and breach notification (30 days for 500+ consumers).

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIST CSF
    Holistic cybersecurity risk management across 6 functions
    GLBA
    Privacy notices, opt-outs, and NPI security program

    Industry

    NIST CSF
    All sectors worldwide, any size
    GLBA
    Financial institutions (broad definition), US-focused

    Nature

    NIST CSF
    Voluntary flexible framework, no certification
    GLBA
    Mandatory regulation with FTC enforcement

    Testing

    NIST CSF
    Self-assessments, Tiers, Profiles, no mandated tests
    GLBA
    Annual pen tests, vulnerability scans, risk assessments

    Penalties

    NIST CSF
    No legal penalties, reputational only
    GLBA
    Up to $100K per violation, civil/criminal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIST CSF and GLBA

    NIST CSF FAQ

    GLBA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages