What is the primary objective of **COPPA**?

**The primary objective of COPPA is to protect the online privacy of children under 13 by requiring verifiable parental consent before operators collect their personal information.** Enacted in 1998 and effective April 21, 2000, COPPA mandates operators of commercial websites, online services, mobile apps, and IoT devices directed to children—or with actual knowledge of collecting data from them—to post privacy policies, limit data collection to necessities, ensure data security, and grant parents review, deletion, and revocation rights (16 CFR Part 312).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COPPA**?

**Operators of commercial websites, online services, mobile apps, and IoT devices that target children under 13 or have actual knowledge of collecting personal information from them must comply with COPPA.** This includes entities collecting or benefiting from data like ad networks; non-profits are exempt unless commercial. Coverage is extraterritorial for services processing U.S. children's data, with "personal information" encompassing names, addresses, persistent identifiers (e.g., IP addresses, device IDs), geolocation to street-level, and audio/video files.

Does **COPPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COPPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for all operators but allows participation in FTC-approved safe harbor programs.** Self-regulatory programs like iKeepSafe (approved 2014) or ESRB (modified 2018) provide FTC-audited compliance paths, offering defenses against enforcement while requiring internal policies, data minimization, and verifiable parental consent mechanisms.

How often should an assessment for **COPPA** be performed?

**COPPA does not prescribe a fixed frequency for assessments, but operators must conduct ongoing reviews to ensure continuous compliance with evolving data practices and FTC guidance.** Regular evaluations are essential for age-screening, consent mechanisms, and data retention (only as necessary, with deletion post-use), especially amid FTC regulatory reviews like the 2019 comment periods.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COPPA**?

**Non-compliance with COPPA results in civil penalties up to $43,792 per violation, enforced by the FTC as unfair or deceptive practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act.** State AGs may also sue; precedents include YouTube's $170 million fine (2019) for unconsented tracking on child-directed content, plus reputational damage and mandated remediation.

Can **COPPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, these FAQs focus solely on COPPA as a standalone U.S. federal law; mapping to other frameworks is outside this scope.** Operators should consult legal experts for any alignments, prioritizing COPPA's unique requirements like verifiable parental consent.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COPPA**?

**The first step to implement COPPA is to conduct an audience analysis to determine if your service is directed to children under 13 or collects their personal information.** Assess for child-appeal factors (e.g., cartoons, games), then post a comprehensive privacy policy, implement age-screening, and secure verifiable parental consent methods like credit card verification or video calls.

What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with **Security (CC1-CC9)** mandatory and others optional based on services. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, enabling stakeholders to verify risk mitigation.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations like SaaS, cloud, and data processors face professional mandates from enterprise clients.** Targeted at providers storing, processing, or transmitting customer data (e.g., fintech, HR tech), 70-80% of enterprise deals require Type 2 reports in RFPs and MSAs, disqualifying non-compliant vendors.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 validates control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over a period via sampling, walkthroughs, and evidence review, resulting in an auditor's opinion (unqualified preferred).

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually, covering a 3-12 month monitoring period, with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months.** Continuous monitoring ensures evidence for recertification, capturing full cycles like quarterly access reviews and annual penetration tests.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles (3-6 months), and heightened breach liability exceeding $1M per incident.** Absent Type 2 reports, vendors face exhaustive VRM scrutiny, custom contracts, reputational damage, and investor concerns in funding rounds.

Can **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps effectively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% control overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A and NIST functions, enabling shared evidence for multi-compliance without dual certifications.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step is a scoping exercise and gap analysis to select Trust Services Criteria and map existing controls to TSC.** Engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K), inventory assets/data flows, and prioritize Security (CC6.1-6.8), producing a remediation roadmap of 50-100 controls.

COPPA vs SOC 2

Standards Comparison

COPPA

Mandatory

1998

U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for child data collection

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organization security controls

Quick Verdict

COPPA mandates parental consent for kids' data on child-directed sites, enforced by FTC fines up to $170M. SOC 2 voluntarily attests service org controls via CPA audits. Companies adopt COPPA for legal compliance, SOC 2 for enterprise trust and sales acceleration.

Children Privacy

COPPA

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Mandates verifiable parental consent before child data collection
Targets operators of child-directed websites apps and IoT
Broad PII definition includes persistent IDs and geolocation
Provides parental rights to access review and delete data
FTC enforced with up to $43792 per violation penalties

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2 (SOC 2)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Five Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
Type 2 reports test operating effectiveness over time
Independent CPA firm attestation and audits
Flexible scoping for service organizations and systems
Overlaps with ISO 27001, NIST, GDPR frameworks

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COPPA Details

What It Is

The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), enacted in 1998 and effective April 21, 2000, is a U.S. federal regulation enforced by the FTC. It targets commercial operators of websites, apps, and IoT devices directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge of collecting their data. Primary purpose: empower parents with control over children's personal information (PII) via verifiable parental consent (VPC) before collection, use, or disclosure. Features a strict consent-based approach with 2013 expansions for modern tracking.

Key Components

**VPC mechanisms11+ methods (credit card, video call, digital signature) on sliding scale.
**PII scopeNames, addresses, persistent IDs (cookies, device IDs), street-level geolocation, audio/video with child's image/voice.
**ObligationsPrivacy policies, data minimization/security, parental access/review/deletion/revocation rights.
**Compliance modelSelf-regulation via FTC-approved safe harbors; no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for applicable operators to avoid civil penalties up to $43,792 per violation (e.g., YouTube $170M fine). Drives legal compliance, parent trust, breach risk reduction, and market access in edtech/gaming. Enhances reputation amid heightened enforcement on child data practices.

Implementation Overview

Conduct child audience assessment, deploy age screens/VPC, post notices, secure data, enable parental tools. Applies globally to U.S. child data handlers; suits all sizes but burdens small operators. Key activities: policy drafting, tech integration, audits. Safe harbors ease via third-party validation; typical for startups: 6-12 months.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). It evaluates service organizations' commitments to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of customer data. Grounded in Trust Services Criteria (TSC), it employs a risk-based, control-focused approach for independent assurance.

Key Components

Five TSCSecurity** (mandatory, CC1-CC9), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy.
50-100 controls mapped to TSC, with redundancy recommended.
Built on COSO principles; Type 1 (design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness) reports.
CPA-attested reports with management assertions.

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates sales by satisfying enterprise vendor requirements.
Builds trust, reduces breach liability, and enhances reputation.
Provides competitive moat via verified controls.
Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001, easing multi-framework compliance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, gap analysis, control deployment, 3-12 month monitoring, CPA audit.
Targets SaaS/cloud providers; scalable for startups (3-6 months) to enterprises.
Annual Type 2 recertification with automation tools like Vanta.

Key Differences

Aspect	COPPA	SOC 2
Scope	Children under 13 online privacy/data collection	Trust services: security, availability, privacy, etc.
Industry	Websites/apps targeting children, global U.S. data	SaaS/cloud/service orgs handling customer data
Nature	Mandatory U.S. federal law, FTC enforced	Voluntary AICPA audit framework
Testing	FTC investigations/enforcement actions	Type 1/2 CPA audits, annual recertification
Penalties	$43,792 per violation, e.g. YouTube $170M	No fines, lost business/reputation

Scope

COPPA

Children under 13 online privacy/data collection

SOC 2

Trust services: security, availability, privacy, etc.

Industry

COPPA

Websites/apps targeting children, global U.S. data

SOC 2

SaaS/cloud/service orgs handling customer data

Nature

COPPA

Mandatory U.S. federal law, FTC enforced

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit framework

Testing

COPPA

FTC investigations/enforcement actions

SOC 2

Type 1/2 CPA audits, annual recertification

Penalties

COPPA

$43,792 per violation, e.g. YouTube $170M

SOC 2

No fines, lost business/reputation

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COPPA and SOC 2

COPPA FAQ

SOC 2 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

WELL vs BREEAM

Compare WELL vs BREEAM: WELL drives occupant health via 10 concepts & onsite testing; BREEAM excels in sustainability with weighted credits. Pick the right path for peak performance!

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs OSHA

CSL vs OSHA: China's Cybersecurity Law meets US workplace safety regs. Compare data localization, penalties & strategies for global compliance. Essential guide!

ISA 95 vs ISO 28000

Compare ISA 95 vs ISO 28000: ISA-95 powers manufacturing IT/OT integration with Purdue levels & models; ISO 28000 fortifies supply chain security via PDCA & risk mgmt. Optimize yours—read now!

COPPA

SOC 2

Quick Verdict

COPPA

Key Features

SOC 2

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COPPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COPPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of COPPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COPPA?

Does COPPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COPPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COPPA?

Can COPPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COPPA?

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

Can SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

WELL vs BREEAM

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs OSHA

ISA 95 vs ISO 28000